Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Implementation of company registration shall be constrained because of differences in theinterpretation of the meaning of the provisions of Article 29 of Law No. 40 of 2007 on LimitedLiability Company, which determines that the registration of the company held by the Ministryof Justice and Human Rights. The provisions of Article 29 is interpreted by many practitioners aslex specialis of Act 3 of 1982 regarding Company Registration Requirement. The reality is not so.Company registration remains to be done pursuant to Act 3 of 1982. There are no provisions thatoverride or cancel that Act 3 of 1982 to enforce Article 29 of Law No. 40 of 2007. Each law urgencyis equally important. Act 40 of 2007 for the purpose of publication, while Act 3 of 1982 is to findout information about the company, either types of business activities, locations, shares and soforth. Registration of the company is still to be done on both the ministry under the provisions oflaw referred to.Implementasi wajib daftar perusahaan menjadi terkendala dikarenakan adanya perbedaanpenafsiran dalam memaknai ketentuan Pasal 29 Undang-Undang No.40 tahun 2007 tentangPerseroan Terbatas, yang menentukan bahwa pendaftaran perusahaan dilaksanakan olehKementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Ketentuan Pasal 29 tersebut ditafsirkan olehbanyk praktisi sebagai lex specialis dari Undang-Undang No.3 tahun 1982 tentang Wajib DaftarPerusahaan. Realitasnya adalah tidak demikian. Pendaftaran Perusahaan tetap harus dilakukanberdasarkan Undang-Undang No.3 tahun 1982. Tidak ada ketentuan yang mengesampingkanatau membatalkan bahwa Undang-Undang No.3 tahun 1982 dengan berlakukan Pasal 29 Undang-Undang No.40 tahun 2007. Masing-masing undang-undang dimaksud memiliki urgensi yangsama pentingnya. Undang-Undang No.40 tahun 2007 untuk kepentingan publikasi, sedangkanUndang-Undang No.3 tahun 1982 adalah untuk mengetahui informasi tentang perusahaan, baikjenis kegiatan usaha, lokasi, saham dan lain sebagainya. Pendaftaran perusahaan adalah tetapharus dilakukan dikedua kementerian berdasarkan ketentuan undang-undang yang dirujuk."

"In the emerging era of information and technology, the importance of privacy and data protection is growing ever since. However, despitesuch common concern from the society, there is some confusion about the mechanisms of differentiation and scope of discussion about privacy with the protection of personal data and even impressed blended with issues of spamming issues. With comparison to Europe and the US legalperspectives, Therefore, this paper tries to discuss such problem in accordance to the perspective of laws to the communication itself."

"Judicial power as an independent and autonomous power must be free from any intervention and power, thus ensuring that judges possess independence and impartiality in handling cases. One of the measures for enhancing the independence and autonomy of the judiciary is by placing it under the one roof judicial arrangement developed by the Supreme Court, both from the judicial as well as the non-judicial technical aspects. Up to the present time, endeavors for bringing the four court jurisdictions under the one roof judicial arrangement developed by the Supreme Court have not been completely materialized, due to the existing dualism in judicial power at various courts. The objective of this research is to understand the developments in the endeavors towards bringing the Indonesian judicial system under the one roof judicial arrangement developed by the Supreme Court. The type of research applied is descriptive normative juridical research, namely legal research based on examining secondary data. As the research results indicate, the one roof system developed by the Supreme Court is already being implemented, with the exception of the Military Court and the Tax Court within the State Administration Court jurisdiction."

"University has significant contribution to the development of nanotechnology. The role of university can be implemented through the TTLO, particularly in an effort to build a bridge for bottom-up nanotechnology for commercial purposes. There will be an increasingly significant link between the patent system and the university role in the development of nanotechnology."

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai kerugian immateril yang ditimbulkan akibat perbuatan melawan hukum. Penelitian ini adalah penelitisan yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan beberapa contoh putusan yang mana ganti kerugian immaterilnya ditolak dan diterima oleh pengadilan, penelitian ini akan memberikan gambaran terkait kerugian immateril yang bagaimana yang diterima atau ditolak. Setiap putusan dianalisis berdasarkan hukum positif, khususnya Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Burgelijk Wetboek . Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk memberikan penjelasan lebih mendalam mengenai kerugian immateril itu sendiri dan bagaimana seharusnya tuntutan ganti rugi immateril dapat diterima atau ditolak.Kata Kunci: Perbuatan melawan hukum, ganti rugi, kerugian immateril.

---

This thesis is about immaterial loss as the impact of tort. The reasearch is a normative juridical research that uses qualitiative approach. The author uses few cases to represent the claim of immaterial loss that are accepted and rejected by the court. From this research, we will know how a claim of immaterial loss can be accepted or rejected. Each cases is analyzed based on Indonesian law especially Indonesian Civil Code Burgelijk Wetboek . The purpose of this research is to give a deep explanation about the immaterial loss itself and how a case with immaterial loss should be accepted or rejected. "

"When comparing the laws of different jurisdictions, one often sees only the forest or the trees. This is particularly problematic in comparative company law, where students hope both to understand the overall framework of the law and grasp its practical application. This text's structure, now in its second edition, solves that dilemma. Chapters open with discursive analyses of the law in each of Germany, the UK and the US (Delaware, the ABA Model Business Corporation Act, and federal securities laws) and set out the high-level governing framework, particularly for the EU and its member states. This analysis is succinct and pointed, with numerous references to both the law and leading scholarship. The whole text is arranged to highlight comparative aspects. Diagrams are used where helpful. Chapters close with edited judicial decisions from at least two of the jurisdictions discussed, which allows fresh exploration of comparison in more detail, and pointed questions to guide class discussion."