Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"

Tulisan ini mendeskripsikan faktor-faktor yang menjadi pertimbangan hakim dalam pengambilan keputusan pada kasus penyalahguna narkotika di Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta periode 2015-2018. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif yang menggunakan data sekunder sebagai sumber data utama. Sebanyak 99 kasus dianalisis menggunakan software SPSS dan analisis tabulasi silang serta uji chi-square untuk mengidentifikasi faktor yang menentukan keputusan hakim pada kasus penyalahgunaan narkotika. Hasil statistik dianalisis menggunakan teori integrated complexity, prisma kejahatan dan teori penghukuman retributif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa tuntutan Jaksa Penuntut Umum (JPU), komposisi hakim dan saksi dokter menjadi faktor yang mempengaruhi keputusan hakim. Penelitian ini berkontribusi sebagai masukan untuk para hakim dan aparat penegak hukum lainnya agar memiliki sudut pandang yang sama dalam menangani kasus penyalahguna narkotika, merehablitiasi penyalahguna narkotika yang memiliki adiksi dan pentingnya berpikir terintegrasi.

 

---

This paper describes the factors that are considered by judges in making decisions in cases of narcotics abuse in the Jakarta District Court for the 2015-2018 period. This research is a quantitative study that uses secondary data as the main data source. Total of 99 cases were analyzed using SPSS software and cross tabulation analysis and chi-square test to identify the factors that determine a judge's decision in narcotics abuse cases. Statistical results were analyzed using the theory of integrated complexity, the prism of crime and the theory of retributive punishment. The results showed that prosecutors 'demands, the composition of judges and doctor witnesses were factors that influenced the judges' decision. This research contributes as input for judges and other law enforcement officers to have the same perspective in handling cases of narcotics abusers, rehabilitating narcotics abusers who have addiction and the importance of integrated thinking.

"

"Women Judges in the Muslim World: A Comparative Study of Discourse and Practice fills a gap in academic scholarship by examining public debates and judicial practices surrounding the performance of women as judges in eight Muslim-majority countries (Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, Syria, Egypt, Libya, Tunisia and Morocco). Gender, class, and ethnic biases are inscribed in laws, particularly in the domain of sharia-derived family law. Editors Nadia Sonneveld and Monika Lindbekk have carefully woven together the extensive fieldwork and expertise of each author. The result is a rich tapestry that brings out the various effects of women judges in the management of justice. In contrast to early scholarship, they convincingly prove that the woman judge does not exist. "

"to what extent is the language of judicial opinions responsive to the political and social context in which constitutional courts operate? Courts are reason-giving institutions, with argumentation playing a central role in constitutional adjudication. However, a cursory look at just a handful of constitutional systems suggests important differences in the practices of constitutional judges, whether in matters of form, style, or language. Focusing on independently-verified leading cases globally, a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis offers the most comprehensive and systematic account of constitutional reasoning to date. This analysis is supported by the examination of eighteen legal systems around the world including the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice. Universally common aspects of constitutional reasoning are identified in this book, and contributors also examine whether common law countries differ to civil law countries in this respect."

"Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh situasi tuturan dalam program The Voice Kids Indonesia (selanjutnya disebut TVKI) di mana juri memberi komentar kepada peserta belia mempertimbangkan aspek kontekstual. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan realisasi kesantunan dalam membangun komentar yang memotivasi. Data penelitian berupa video TVKI ep.1-4 dan 9-11 yang diunduh melalui saluran resmi YouTube. Data berupa audio kemudian ditranskrip secara ortografis. Hasil transkripsi dianalisis dengan merujuk pada teori motivasi Maslow (1970) dan teori kesantunan Brown dan Levinson (1987) Hasil penelitian membuktikan bahwa juri-juri TVKI lebih banyak menggunakan strategi kesantunan positif saat memenuhi empat kebutuhan hidup peserta dan merepresntasi daya motivasi di komentar mereka.

---

This research is motivated by the situation of utterances in The Voice Kids Indonesia program (hereinafter referred for TVKI) where the judges give comments to young paticipants considering the contextual aspects. This research aims to explain the realization of politeness in building motivational comments. The research is data of TVKI s videos the episodes 1-4 and 9-11 which are taken from TVKI s official YouTube channel. The audio of TVKI s video then transcribe with orthographicly. The data were analyzed by using motivation theory by Maslow and politeness theory by Brown and Levinson. Based on the data analysis it shows that most of TVKI judges utterances are identified as positive politeness strategy utterances. Positive politeness strategies are used to gratify the four humans basic need in representing motivation in their comments"

"On the stripped of the Judicial Commission of its oversight role by Constitutional Court and its impact on judicial reform and law enforcement in Indonesia."

"Kebebasan berkontrak yang merupakan "roh" dan "napas" sebuah kontrak atau perjanjian secara implisit memberikan panduan bahwa dalam berkontrak pihakpihak diasumsikan mempunyai kedudukan yang seimbang. Dengan demikian, diharapkan akan muncul kontrak yang adil dan seimbang pula bagi para pihak. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah studi kepustakaan yang bersifat yuridisnormatif. Hasil penelitian menyarankan bahwa ada sejumlah pembatasan terhadap kebebasan berkontrak dalam sejumlah sistem hukum. Pembatasan kebebasan berkontrak tersebut dilakukan baik melalui peraturan perundang-undangan maupaun putusan pengadilan. Dalam sistem hukum modern dewasa ini, kebebasan berkontrak di atas tidak hanya dibatasi oleh larangan-larangan yang diciptakan peraturan perundang-undangan (statutory prohibition), tetapi juga oleh extra legal standard. Extra legal standard tersebut merupakan standar yang berkaitan dengan agama, moral, dan keadilan. Dengan adanya standar ini, maka kontrak tidak dapat lagi hanya dipandang sebagai ex nihilo, hasil dari kesepakatan atau kehendak bebas para pihak untuk saling mengikatkan diri, tetapi kontrak harus dikaitkan dengan prinsip-prinsip agama, moral dan keadilan. Keseimbangan para pihak dalam berkontrak merupakan konsep dasar yang tidak dapat ditawar dan mutlak harus dipenuhi, karena itu dalam diri para pihak yang berkontrak harus terdapat pemahaman dan penghormatan terhadap hak masing-masing. Oleh karena itu, dapat dipahami perkembangan asas kebebasan berkontrak yang cenderung mengarah pada ketidakseimbangan para pihak kemudian dibatasi oleh berbagai ketentuan yang bersifat memaksa agar pertukaran hak dan kewajiban dapat berlangsung secara proporsional. Hakim diberikan kekuasaan untuk mengawasi pelaksanaan suatu perjanjian, agar jangan sampai pelaksanaan itu melanggar keadilan dan kepatutan. Selain itu, Hakim juga berkuasa untuk menyimpangi daripada isi perjanjian menurut susunan kata-katanya, manakala pelaksanaan yang demikian itu bertentangan dengan rasa keadilan, hal ini berdasarkan Pasal 1338 Ayat (3) KUHPerdata.

---

Freedom contract that is "breath" and "spirit" a contract or agreement in an implicit manner provides guidance whereby the contracting parties are assumed to have a balanced position. Thus, the contract is fair and balanced for the parties. The method used in this research is a normative-juridical approach. Research results suggest that there are a number of restrictions against freedom of contract in a number of a legal system. The restriction of freedom of contract should be conducted through legislation of judicial decision. In the modern legal system, this adult freedom contract mentioned above is not only limited by restrictions created in the legislation (statutory offense prohibition), but also by extra legal standard. This legal standard one standards related to religion morality, and justice. With the existence of this standard, then contract. Can no longer be viewed ex nihilo. Contract is not only the product of content and free will of the parties, but it has to be associated with religions, morality, and the just principles. Balance parties in of contract is the basic concept that indespensible and absolute must be fulfilled, therefore there will be of mutual understanding and respect between the parties for their rights. Hence, it is understood the development of the principle of freedom of contracts that are likely to lead to an imbalance of the Parties subsequently limited by a variety of provisions that are forced to exchange rights and obligations can take place proportionally. Judges are given the power to oversee the implementation of an agreement, in order the prevent violation of fairness and propriety. In addition, the judge also rule against the content of the agreement according to the arrangement of the words, should the implementation that is contrary to the sense of Justice based on Article 1338 BW paragraph (3). "

"Perkembangan masyarakat membawa pengaruh pada tingkat kejahatan. Semakin berkembang kehidupan sosial masyarakat, maka semakin berkembang pula bentuk kejahatan. Sistem peradilan pidana dikembangkan untuk menyelesaikan perkara pidana yang ditangani oleh aparat penegak hukum. Hakim sebagai salah satu komponen dalam sistem peradilan pidana memegang peranan yang sangat penting terutama dalam upaya memberikan rasa keadilan pada masyarakat. Namun dalam perkembangan saat ini, pengadilan dan hakim khususnya mengalami penurunan dalam hal kualitas dan kepercayaan masyarakat. Oleh karena itu sebagian besar anggota masyarakat menginginkan adanya perubahan dalam mekanisme peradilan. Salah satu perubahan yang diinginkan adalah adanya hakim yang memiliki keahlian dan pemahaman atas suatu permasalahan. Hakim ad hoc merupakan kebijakan yang diambil oleh pemerintah dan DPR untuk mengatasi hambatan dalam penegakan hukum. Eksistensi hakim ad hoc telah dimulai sejak diberlakukannya Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Pembentukan hakim ad hoc pada dasarnya adalah untuk menemukan kebenaran materiil melalui sudut pandang keahlian tertentu. Konsep hakim ad hoc telah diadopsi dalam beberapa pengadilan khusus antara lain pengadilan HAM, pengadilan tindak pidana korupsi, dan pengadilan perikanan. Pembentukan hakim ad hoc dalam pengadilan khusus disebabkan oleh adanya perubahan sosial yang terjadi di dalam masyarakat. Oleh karena itu penulisan tesis ini mengangkat permasalahan hubungan antara perubahan sosial dan perubahan hukum dalam kaitannya dengan eksistensi hakim ad hoc. Analisis melalui kerangka teori hukum responsif diharapkan dapat menjelaskan hubungan antara perubahan sosial dan perubahan hukum. Hukum responsif tidak hanya memberikan legitimasi perubahan hukum yang disebabkan oleh perubahan sosial, tetapi juga menjelaskan adanya dilema antara integritas dan keterbukaan dalam institusi kekuasaan kehakiman. (Hasril Hertanto).

---

Development of society brings about quality of criminal law affairs. The more developed of society the more developed of criminal affairs. Judge as one of components of criminal justice system plays an important role, especially in providing justice to society. However, due to the recent development, court and judges in particular the quality and giving trust to the society are decreasing. Therefore, some member of societies wants changes in court mechanism. One of the changes needed is the availability of professional judges who has high expertise and understanding of the problems. The formation of Ad hoc judge is a policy taken by the government and parliament in order to overcome the obstacle of law enforcement. The existent of ad hoc judges has been launched the law Number 5, 1986 concerning Administrative Court take place. The basic formation of ad hoc judges is to find the material truth through a certain expertise. The concept of ad hoc judge is adopted in some special courts, namely Human Right Court, Anti Corruption Court and Fishery Court The formation of ad hoc in special court above is a push factor in the form of social changes in Society. The thesis, therefore, deals with the problem of relationship between social change and law system. Analysis through theory of responsive law hopefully will be able to explain the relationship of social changes and law changes. Responsive law is not only provide legitimate of law changes which is caused by social change but also explain the dilemma between integrity and transparency of justice authority institution. Based on analysis it is found out that the formation of special court is a result of accumulation of community distrust, lack of judges expertise and to understand the changes of circumstances."

"Mekanisme lembaga Praperadilan dianggap tidak berjalan sebagaimana mestinya dalam pelaksanaannya karena dianggap banyak merugikan masyarakat pencari keadilan, sehingga banyak bermunculan pendapat dan pandangan yang menginginkan agar lembaga Praperadilan digantikan oleh Hakim Komisaris yang diajukan dalam RUU KUHAP 2008. Konsep lembaga hakim Komisaris yang diajukan dalam RUU KUHAP 2008 merupakan suatu lembaga baru di Indonesia, tetapi bukan merupakan sesuatu hal yang baru di Indonesia. Kewenangan yang diberikan kepada Hakim Komisaris sangat luas dan lengkap dibandingkan dengan lembaga Praperadilan dalam KUHAP. Meskipun demikian, tidak tertutup kemungkinan timbul permasalahan baru dengan adanya lembaga Hakim Komisaris dalam RUU KUHAP 2008. Penulisan inimerupakan analisis mengenai konsep lembaga Hakim Komisaris yang menggantikan lembaga Praperadilan sebagai lembaga pengawasan pada tahap pemeriksaan pendahuluan.

---

Mechanism of Praperadilan institutions are no longer considered not running properly in its implementation because many people seeking justice harmed, so there are many opinions and views to make the institution Praperadilan replaced by the Magistrate proposed in the revision of Indonesian Code of Criminal Procedure 2008. The Magistrate concepts proposed in the revision of Indonesian Code of Criminal Procedure 2008 as a new institution in Indonesia, but not a new issue in Indonesia. The authority given to the Magistrate is more complete than Praperadilan in the Indonesian Code of Criminal Procedure (UU No. 8 Tahun 1981). However, the possibility is new problems arise with the Magistrate institution in Indonesian Code of Criminal Procedure revision 2008. This research is an analysis of the concept of a Magistrate institution replace Praperadilan institutions as institutions supervision at the stage of preliminary examination."

"ABSTRAKSkripsi ini membahas mengenai peran sebuah perpustakaan khusus instansi pemerintahan dalam memenuhi kebutuhan informasi peneliti hakim. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi kebutuhan informasi peneliti hakim dan layanan yang diberikan Perpustakaan MK dalam memenuhi kebutuhan informasi peneliti hakim. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif dengan desain deskriptif. Hasilpenelitian menunjukkan bahwa perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi sudah dapat membantu memenuhi kebutuhan informasi peneliti hakim. Layanan yang dimiliki perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi sudah mampu memenuhi kebutuhan informasi peneliti hakim, walaupun ada beberapa koleksi yang harus ditambah untuk meningkatkan peran perpustakaan yang lebih baik lagi.

---

abstractThis research examines the role of a special library of a governmental body in fulfilling the need of information by the judges? researchers. This research is to identify the need of information by the judges? researchers and the services provided by Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi in fulfilling the need of information by the judges? researchers. This research is a qualitative research withdescriptive design. The result of this research shows that Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi has been able to fulfil the need of information by the judges? researchers. The services provided by Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi has been able to fulfill the need of information by the judges? researchers, even though there are some collection that should be added to increase the role of a better library."