Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Since eradicating corruption having been continously encouraged by late governments ? and until now ? , there would not be less important as to retracting the corrupted assets. There are many aspects to be considered in doing such action, such as manifesting the legal aspects of administrative law, and so other applied national regulations. By these regulations, such as Law No. 7 of 2006 on Ratification of United Nations Convention against Corruption, 2003 (Konvensi Perserikatan Bangsa Bangsa Anti-Korupsi, 2003), Law Number 25 of 2003 On Amendment to Law Number 15 of 2002 on Money Laundering, Act 30 of 2002 on Corruption Eradication Commission, Law Number 20 Year 2001 regarding Amendment to Law Number 31 Year 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption, and Government Regulation Number 65 of 1999 on Implementation Procedures for Examination of State Property, retraction the corrupted assets should be define in order to get known about eradicating corruption. Another issue that urgently to be defined, as it also become main subject of retracting assets, is the asset itself. Indeed, as the asset which become mainly discussed about is State assets. So, it would be very necessary to clearly have a distinction between State responsibility and that of irresponsibility of the State, in order to settle down, as an after effect, many interpretations."

"Kecamatan merupakan struktur tertua dalam struktur pemerintahan subnasional. Sebelum lahir Undang-Undang (UU) Desentralisasi Tahun 1903, Belanda hanya membangun struktur pemerintahan subnasional menurut asas dekonsentrasi dengan kecamatan (onderdistrict) selaku struktur terbawah yang terus dipertahankan hingga jaman kemerdekaan. UU No. 5/1974 menentukan kecamatan tetap sebagai wilayah administrasi dalam rangka dekonsentrasi yang dipimpin oleh camat sebagau Kepala Wilayah. Lahirnya UU No. 22/1999 dan UU No. 32/2004 mengubah secara drastik struktur dan status kecamatan sebagai wilayah kerja Camat selaku perangkat daerah otonom kabupaten/kota. Perubahan drastik tersebut dipandang sebagai reformasi administrasi subnasional sehingga berbagai perubahan yang terjadi, konflik yang diakibatkan oleh reformasi tersebut, dan solusi pemerintah subnasional menarik dikaji.Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatiif, unit analisis adalah kecamatan di kota Bogor. Data dikumpulkan dengan teknik observasi, studi dokumentasi, wawancara mendalam, pengamatan dan diskusu terfokus. Key informan bersifat snow ball. Analisis dilakukan pada pemerintah Kota Boogor dan kecamatan. Data dianalisis melalui tahapan pengumpulan data mentah, transkip, koding, penyimpulan sementara, trianggulasi, dan kesimpulan akhir.Temuan pada pemerintahan subnasional adalah: Pertama, struktur orga nisasi perangkat daera )OPD) cukup ramping, tetapi dengan dibentuknya 26 UPTD menjadi tidak efektif dan tidak efisien. Pembentukan UPTD sarat konflik kepentingan elit lokal, dan dalam hal tertentu menjadi sumber konflik antar lembaga. Kedua, Pelimpahan wewenang dari walikota kepada camat merupakan aspek positif tetapi belum didukung oleh pelimpahan personil, peralatan dan pem biayaan (3P), yang memadai. Ketiga, Kewenangan yang diterima dipandang aparat kecamatan sebagai kewenangan setengah hari, dan kurang memberikan nilai ekonomis pada kecamatan.Temuan pada tingkat kecamatan: Pertama, struktur kecamatan lebih ramping, lebih fleksibel dengan sistem, prosedur dan tata kerja pelayanan mengalami perbaikan, tidak berbelit-belit, dan lebih transparan tetapi disiplin dan kecepatan kerja masih rendah. Kecamatan memiliki anggaran berbasis kinerja tetapi sangat terbatas apalagi dengan dilikuidasinya cabang dinas membuat urusan kecamatan semakin banyak dengan kewenangan terbatas. Kepemimpinan Camat sangat strategis, ke atas menyampaikan aspirasi masyarakat ke bawah melaksanakan misi pembangunan. Camat harus dapat berperan ga da sebagai pemimpin masyarakat dan manager kantor kecamatan. Kedua, Perubahan struktur belum diikuti dengan perubahan kinerja individu secara signifikan. Kualifikasi pendidikan aparat masih rendah, tidak memiliki ketrampilan teknis memadai, dan training hampir tidak ada. Budaya kerja meningkat ke arah positif tetapi masih bersifat paternalistik. Cara pandang aparat mengalami perubahan, lebih melayani, lebih ramah, dan lebih bertanggung jawab tetapi penggunaan waktu belum efektif, kurang responsif dna kaku (rule driven).Konflik yang teramati terjadi pada level individu, lembaga dan dengan masyarakat. Konflik individu sering terjadi pada Camat yang kekuasaannya berkurang signifikan, sehingga secara alamiah kurang responsif terhadap perubahan. Konflik antar lembaga terjadi karena adanya konlik kepentingan, ketidak jelasan dan tumpang tindih tugas dan tanggung jawab, sikap curiga, dan koordinasi yang tidak berjalan baik. Konlik dengan masarkat disebabkan karena menguatnya posisi tawar masyarakat sebagai dampak dari berkembangnya demokrasi dan kesadaran terhadao HAM. Masarakat cenderung menjadi kelompok penekan (pressure groups).Pemerintah subnasional dan kecamatan menyelesaikan konflik dengan musyawarah dialog, kesepakatan dan koinsesnsus untuk menciptakan situasi sama-sama menang atau sama-sama tidak dirugikan. Selanjutnya, sedang dikaji kewenangan lai yang akan didelegasikan pada kecamatan dengan melibatkan berbagai pihak. Selain itu, keberadaan UPTD juga akan dikaji karena cenderung memperpanjang birokrasi dan tidak efisien. Walikota memberikan diskresi kepada camat untuk menyelesaikan permaslahan secara otonom. Lebih jauh konflik diselesaika berdasarkan kasus per kasus. Belum ditemukan grand design dalam penyelesaian konflik dengan menggali akar permasalahan yang sesungguhnya.Berdasarkan analisis hasil penelitian, keberadaan kecamatan masih sangat dibutuhkan sebagai pusat pelayanan yang paling dekat dengan masyarakt. Kecamatan perlu lebih diberikan kewenangan riil, diskresi dan dukungan personil, fasilitas dan dana yang memadai. Di atas semuanya adalah political will, komitmen dan konsistensi pemerintah subnasional dalam menjadikan kecamatan sebagai lini terdepan pelayanan. Implikasi teoritik penelitian ini adalah pengembangan model=model pelayanan kecamatan apakah sebagi single atau multi ouroose agency yang menarik untuk diteliti lebih lanjut.

---

Sub-distnct (kecamatan) is the oldest structure in sub-national/local govemment structure. Before Law of Decentralization in 1903 issued, Dutch only developed the structure in line with deconcentration principle in which sub-district (onderailstricb remained the lowest structure till the independence. Law No. 5/1974 determined that sub-district was still as an administrative region in the context of deconcentration, led by Camat as head of the sub-district. The introduction of Law No. 22/1999 and Law No. 32/2004 as the bases of transforming centralistic system to decentralistic one with the implication of shifting sub-district structure from administrative region to the working area of Camat; and the status of Camat as central apparatus to be the local apparatus. The drastic change is considered as a sub-national administrative reform so that any changes occurred, conflicts as the result of the reform, and the solution of sub-national govemment are interesting to study.This study used qualitative method with sub-districts in Bogor municipality as the analysis unit. Data was collected by observation technique, document studv, intensive interview, observation, and focused discussion. Key informants were snow ball. The analysis was conducted at the government of Bogor Municipality and sub-districts. Data was analyzed through collecting raw data, transcribing, coding, interim concluding, triangulating, and final concluding.Findings at sub-national government are: Firstly, local instrument body (LIB) is slim enough, however, the establishment of 26 UPTDs (local technical service unit) makes LIB ineffective and inefficient. The establishment of 26 UPTDs is full conflict of interest of local elites, and, in any cases, becomes the source of conflict among bodies and agencies. Secondly, the delegation of authority from the Mayor to Camat is a positive aspect, but has not been supported yet by the appropriate delegation ofpersonnel, facilities, and budge. Thirdly, the accepted authority is considered by the sub-district apparatus as the half hearted, and gives less economic value for the sub-district.Findings at sub-district level: Hrslin the sub-district structure is simpler, more flexible where the system and procedure of services have changed. The services are not complicated and more transparent, whereas the discipline and the working velocity are still low. Sub-district has very limited performance-based budget. Moreover, by the liquidation of sub-agency (cabang dinas), it makes sub-district get more and more duties with the restricted authority. The role of Camat is very strategic-delivering the community?s aspiration to the local govemment and conducting the development mission to the community- thus require Camat to function as a community leader and a sub-district manager. Secandig the structure change has not been followed significantly by the change of individual perfonnance. The education qualification of apparatus is still low. They dont have enough technical skills, and hardly take part of in trainings. Working culture improves positively, although it is soil paternalistrc. The apparatus? point of view changes as well. They are more helpful, friendlier and more responsible, but they still spend the times ineffectively, less responsive and rule driven.The observed conflicts occurred in the individual, institutional and community levels. The individual conflict happened frequently to Camat whose authority decreases significantly so that he/she becomes, naturally, less responsive toward any changes. Conflicts between institutions occurred due to the conflict of interest, me ambiguous and overlapping duties and responsibilities, the skeptical atdtude, and the bad running cardination. Conliict with the community is caused by the better bargaining sition of the community- as the consequences of the development of democracy and gf time awaren s of human rights. The community tends to be the pressure groups.Sub-national govemment and sub-district make conliict resolution through discussion, dialog, agreement, and consensus rn order to create the win-win solution. Concerning me auighgfiry, the local government is going to review the other authorities given to me sob district with any parties. Besides, the existence of UPTDS is also going to be Fewiewed doe to the fact that UPTDS tend to lengthen bureaucracy and be inefficient. The Mayor gives Camat discretion to solve the problems autonomously. Above all, the local government has not yet developed grand design to resolve the conflict and to make the sub district become a service center.Based on the result of the study, the existence of sub-district as the closest service centre to the community is still needed in the future. Sub-district also needs more real authority, discretion and the support of personnel, facility and budget. The most important thing is that the local government has good political will, commitment, and consistency to develop sub-district. The theoretical implication of this study is the development of sub-district service models whether it is as a single or as a multi purpose agency. Those models are interested to study further."

"Penyelesaian Pelanggaran administrasi Pilkada dan Pemilu oleh Bawaslu dan jajaran sesuai dengan mandat UU Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilu dan UU Nomor 10 Tahun 2016 tentang Pemilihan Gubernur, Bupati dan Walikota. Keduanya menggunakan mekanisme yang bebeda yaitu mekanisme penerimaan laporan, kajian dengan produk rekomendasi untuk pilkada dan mekanisme adjudikasi dalam persidangan terbuka umum dengan produk putusan untuk Pemilu. Pada praktiknya terdapat hambatan dalam penyelesaian pelanggaran administrasi pilkada yang difokuskan pada pelanggaran Pasal 71 ayat (2) ayat (3) dengan sanksi administrasi pembatalan calon karena diparitas mekanisme dan produk akhir ini. Ditemui variasi tindaklanjut yang dilakukan oleh KPU dan jajarannya ketika produk pelanggaran administrasi berupa rekomendasi meskipun baik putusan ataupun rekomendasi, UU Pemilu dan UU Pilkada sama mengatur kewajiban KPU dan jajarannya untuk melakukan tindaklanjut. Perbedaan terletak pada konteks pilkada karena setalah rekomendasi Bawaslu diberikan UU Pilkada juga memberikan kewenangan memeriksa dan memutus pelanggaran administrasi Pilkada oleh KPU dan jajarannya. Perumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimanakan penanganan pelanggaran administrasi Pilkada dan Penanganan Pelanggaran administrasi Pemilu oleh Bawaslu dan bagaimanakah hambatan dalam penanganan pelanggaran administrasi Pilkada jika dibandingkan dengan penanganan pelanggaran Pemilu berdasarkan Putusan dan Rekomendasi. Penulisan tesis ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penanganan pelanggaran administrasi Pilkada dan Pemilu menggunakan mekanisme yang diatur oleh dua regulasi yang berbeda sehingga menimbulkan disparitas meskipun diselenggarakan oleh lembaga yang memiliki kewenangan yang sama sebagaimana putusan MK 48/PUU-XVII/2019. Ditemui hambatan seperti perbedaan pemahaman antara KPU dan Bawaslu, sifat dan daya ikat rekomendasi, mekanisme non adjudikasi yang tidak berimbang dengan output rekomendasi pembatalan calon, peraturan KPU yang tidak sesuai. Saran adalah perbaikan kerangka hukum dengan revisi UU Pilkada berkenaan dengan kewenangan pelanggaran administrasi menyesuaikan dengan UU Pemilu untuk pelanggaran Pasal 71 ayat (2), (3) dengan sanksi pembatalan calon dengan output putusan, mengatur hukum acara sendiri, revisi PKPU Nomor 25 Tahun 2013 dan membangun kesepahaman antar lembaga penyelenggara pemilu

---

Settlement of Election and Election administrative violations by Bawaslu and its ranks in accordance with the mandate of Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections and Law Number 10 of 2016 concerning Election of Governors, Regents and Mayors. Both of them use different mechanisms, namely the mechanism for receiving reports, studies with recommendation products for the regional elections and adjudication mechanisms in public open trials with decisions for elections. In practice, there are obstacles in resolving election administrative violations which are focused on violations of Article 71 paragraph (2) paragraph (3) with administrative sanctions for canceling candidates due to the disparity of the mechanism and the final product. There were variations of follow-up carried out by the KPU and its staff when the product of administrative violation was in the form of a recommendation, even though it was a decision or recommendation. The Election Law and the Pilkada Law both regulate the obligations of the KPU and its staff to follow up. The difference lies in the context of the election because after the Bawaslu recommendation was given the Pilkada Law also gave the authority to examine and decide on violations of the election administration by the KPU and its staff. The formulation of the problem in this research is howhandling of election administrative violations and handling of election administrative violations by Bawaslu and how are the obstacles in handling election administrative violations when compared to handling election violations based on Decisions and Recommendations. The writing of this thesis uses a normative juridical legal research method. The results of the study indicate that the handling of administrative violations of the Pilkada and General Elections uses a mechanism regulated by two different regulations, causing disparities even though they are carried out by institutions that have the same authority as the Constitutional Court's decision 48/PUU-XVII/2019. Obstacles were encountered such as differences in understanding between the KPU and Bawaslu, the nature and binding power of the recommendations, non-adjudication mechanisms that were not balanced with the output of recommendations for the cancellation of candidates, Inappropriate KPU regulations. Suggestions are improvements to the legal framework by revising the Pilkada Law with regard to the authority for administrative violations to comply with the Election Law for violations of Article 71 paragraph (2), (3) with sanctions for canceling candidates with decision outputs, regulating their own procedural law, revising PKPU Number 25 of 2013 and build understanding among election management bodies."

"Attempting political democratization, strengthening macroeconomic condition, and developing independent judiciary have been three sector paid more concerns in Indonesia. Beside, administrative reform in Indonesia is considered another sector that is so worth to perform since it plays significant role as prerequisite infrastructure in which other reform efforts are preceded as well as dealing with daily life public services. In doing so, taking administrative procedure law in other well-developed countries, such as the U.S, Germany, and the Netherland, Indonesia government are about to make draft of Government Administration Law. By using point of view as a practicioner of German public servant, this article emphasizes fundamental aspect of this effort in comparison to what has been preceded in Germany as well. That is distinguishing as well as separating administration from branch of political power, especially the executive, in order to maintain its independence and neutrality. It is what the respective legal draft is supposed to afford."

"UU No. 5 Tahun 1999 memberikan kewenangan menjatuhkan sanksi administratif kepada KPPU sebagai competition authority di Indonesia. Dalam beberapa kasus, KPPU memberikan sanksi administratif di luar dari yang terdapat dalam Undang-Undang tersebut, khususnya dalam perkara persekongkolan tender. KPPU sering menjatuhkan sanksi larangan mengikuti tender atau pelelangan kepada pelaku usaha, padahal bentuk sanksi tersebut tidak terdapat dalam Undang-Undang.Dalam putusan KPPU No. 1/KPPU-L/2013, KPPU menjatuhkan sanksi larangan mengikuti pelelangan selama dua tahun kepada ketiga pelaku usaha. Akibat permasalahan ini beberapa putusan KPPU yang memuat hukuman tersebut dibatalkan oleh Pengadilan Negeri maupun Mahkamah Agung. Padahal pelaku usaha tersebut terbukti melanggar pasal 22.

---

Competition Act No. 5 Year 1999 gives an authority for KPPU as competition authority in Indonesia to impose administrative sanction. In some cases, KPPU also imposed administrative sanction beyond those which contained in Competition Act, especially in bid rigging cases. KPPU often imposes prohibition in tendering or auctions sanction to the bidders. However, that kind of sanction is not exist in the Competition Act. In Commission’s Decision No. 1/KPPU-L/2013, KPPU imposed prohibition in auctions for two years to those three tender participants. The consequence of this problem is some of KPPU’s Decisions which contained that kind of sanction were cancelled by District Court or by

Supreme Court, although that tender participants have been proven violating the article No. 22 in Competition Act."

"Penyelesaian kerugian keuangan negara akibat kelalaian/kesalahan administrasi seharusnya merupakan penyelesaian administrasi sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2004 tentang Perbendaharaan Negara dan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Kerugian negara selalu diarahkan kepada hukum pidana dan mengabaikan hukum administrasi negara. Hal ini disebabkan karena kurangnya pemahaman mengenai teori hukum administrasi negara. Tidak semua penyimpangan khususnya dalam hal tindakan aparatur pemerintah dikenai sanksi pidana apabila hukum administrasi negara memberikan pedoman dan sanksi. Untuk itu, perlu dibuat adanya Standar Operasional agar penyelesaian kerugian keuangan negara akibat kesalahan/kelalaian admnistrasi dapat diselesaikan secara administrasi dan peningkatan pengawasan dari APIP dalam hal ndash;hal yang berhubungan dengan administrasi pemerintahan.

---

Solving Mechanism of State Financial Loss Due to Administrative Failure and or error should be an administrative settlement in accordance with Law No. 1 of 2004 on State Treasury and Law No. 30 Year 2014 on Government Administration. State losses are always directed to the criminal law and the law ignores the state administration. This is due to lack of understanding of the theory of administrative law. Not all irregularities, especially in terms of the actions of government officials subject to criminal sanctions if the administrative law providing guidelines and sanctions. For that, need to be made that the completion of their Standard Operating state financial losses due to errors omissions of Administrative can be resolved administratively and increased supervision of the APIP in those things which relate to government administration. "