Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"At the end of twentieth century there were acquisition dominated business transaction within national scale and also international scale. In the international term there is known acquisition across border. corporate acquisition is one amongst many business strategies for developing corporation within home country and abroad without necessitated to set up a new legal business entity. Acquisition becomes a faster and easier selection in getting financial return. A rampant acquisition of corporation at this moment need to be supervised closely and carefully by many parties since the trend of dominant acquisition many break Antimonopoly Law and Banking law as happening with Maybank acquisition of BII. There is indication that the acquisition of BII's shares have broken Bank Indonesia regulation concerning single presence policy on Indonesia Banking. Nevertheless until now, the growing activities of shares acquisition across border have not comprehensively been regulated yet into regulation of Limited Corporation Law, Antimonopoly Law and Indonesia Banking Law."

"Skripsi ini membahas faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan Bank Indonesia menerbitkan Surat Edaran No.14/7/DPbS dan praktik gadai emas syariah serta implikasinya setelah diterbitkan peraturan tersebut di Bank UDA. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif terhadap regulasi yang dikeluarkan Bank Indonesia selaku bank sentral dengan pendekatan studi kasus pada salah satu bank syariah yang memiliki produk gadai emas syariah. Hasil dari penelitian adalah Bank Indonesia menemukan sejumlah fakta pelanggaran komitmen dan indikasi praktik investasi dalam gadai emas syariah. Secara keseluruhan tidak terdapat perbedaan prosedur gadai emas syariah setelah diterbitkan Surat Edaran No.14/7/DPbS di Bank UDA, hanya ada penambahan fungsi Admin Gadai untuk menerapkan dual control. Implikasi diterbitkannya peraturan tersebut terhadap praktik gadai emas syariah adalah pasar gadai emas syariah semakin kecil dan kompetitif, adanya persaingan yang tidak seimbang, dan pertumbuhan Perbankan Syariah menjadi terhambat.

---

This thesis discusses about the factors that led Bank of Indonesia issued regulation letter No.14/7/DPbS, sharia gold pawn practices and the implications of being published the regulation at UDA Bank. This study is a descriptive study of the regulation issued by Bank of Indonesia as the central bank with a case study approach to one of Islamic banks that have sharia gold pawn products.

The results of the study is Bank Indonesia found a number of facts the commitment offense and indications of investment practices in the sharia gold pawn. Overall there was no difference procedures of sharia gold pawn after regulation letter No.14/7/DPbS issued at UDA Bank, there only additional function, Pawn Admin, to implement dual control. Implications of the issuance of these regulations on the sharia gold pawn practices are market getting smaller and competitive, the competition is not balanced, and a stunted growth of Islamic Banking."

"This book provides an overview of the practice of Islamic finance and the historical roots that define its modes of operation. The focus of the book is analytical and forward-looking. It shows that Islamic finance exists primarily today as a form of rent-seeking legal arbitrage. An alternative that emphasizes substance rather than form would serve religious and moral objectives better, through mutual and similar financial practices."

"Summary:The Oxford Handbook of Financial Regulation is the first comprehensive, state of the art survey of the nature and function of financial regulation. Written by an international team of leading scholars in the field, it takes a contextual and comparative approach to examine scholarly, policy, and regulatory developments in the past three decades"

"Kehadiran perbankan dengan sistem syariah dengan keragaman produknya di Indonesia hingga saat ini cukup mendapat sambutan baik dari masyarakat maupun dari kalangan perbankan. Salah satu produk perbankan syariah yang akan dibahas dalam tesis ini adalah produk pembiayaan Ijarah Muntahiyah Bi Tamlik (IMBT) pada BRI Syariah. Secara umum konsep produk ini hampir sama dengan produk sewa bell. Pokok permasalahannya adalah apakah dalam perjanjian pembiayaan IMBT prinsip perikatan Islam telah terpenuhi dan bagaimana kepemilikan atas barang yang dibiayai. Pada prakteknya, barang pada pembiayaan IMBT langsung diatasnamakan kepada nasabah, bukan diatasnamakan kepada bank selaku pihak yang menyewakan barang. Dalam penulisan tesis ini tipe penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif analitis. Sumber data yang digunakan adalah jenis primer dan data sekunder.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan pembuatan perjanjian pembiayaan IMBT masih berpedoman pada hukum positif Indonesia karena belum ada peraturan perbankan syariah namun demikian prinsip-prinsip perikatan Islam sudah terpenuhi dan peraturan hukum positif tidak bertentangan dengan perikatan prinsip-prinsip Islam. Mengingat pembiayaan IMBT identik dengan sewa bell, seharusnya secara yuridis dokumen bukti kepemilikan diatasnamakan kepada pihak yang menyewakan. Namun pada prakteknya di BRI Syariah bukti kepemilikan tidak diatasnamakan kepada SRI terlebih dahulu melainkan langsung diatasnamakan kepada nasabah dengan pertimbangan menghemat biaya, waktu dan tenaga. Hal ini tidak dapat dibenarkan dari segi syariah karena akad IMBT ini diformulasikan sebagai akad pembiayaan jual beli yang memberikan konsekuensi double pajak sebagaimana diuraikan dalam tesis ini.

---

The presence of banking with Syariah System with it's variety product in Indonesia, at this time get a good response from society or banking community. One of syariah banking will be discussed in this research is financing product Ijarah Muntahiyah Bi Tamlik ( IMBT ) at syariah BRI. In a common manner this product concept is nearly the same with sale and lease product. The basic problem is weather in the agreement IMBT financing the Islamic principles of commitment have been fulfilled and now property for material that has been expensed. In fact, the financing of material in IMBT put in the name of customer directly, not put in the name of bank as a side that lease out material. The objective of this research using analytical descriptive. The resources of the data is used primary and secondary data.

The result of the research point out that implementation production agreement financing IMBT still guide by Indonesian positive law, because it doesn't have syariah banking law, nevertheless principles of Islamic association has been fulfilled and positive law doesn't be in contradiction with Islamic principle association. Considering IMBT financing is the same as sale and lease product, IMBT should as juridical evidence document ownership not in the name of lease out side. But the matter of fact in syariah BRI the evidence ownership not in the name of BRI first but rather in the name of customer directly with weighing economize cost, time and energy. In the case isn't corrected from syariah side because the agreement of the IMBT has been fulfilled as the agreement of financing sale and lease that give consequences double tax have been explained in this research."

"Perkembangan teknologi internet telah dimanfaatkan oleh perbankan untuk menyediakan layanan internet banking. Meskipun internet banking sarat dengan risiko, bank lebih melihat internet banking sebagai tantangan dan peluang untuk mengembangkan bisnisnya. Bank Indonesia sebagai otoritas pengatur dan pengawas bank banyak mengeluarkan peraturan, termasuk peraturan yang terkait dengan penyelenggaraan internet banking. Peraturan-peraturan ini dimaksudkan agar bank dalam menjalankan kegiatan usahanya senantiasa memperhatikan prinsip kehati-hatian dan menerapkan tata kelola perusahaan yang baik. Bank yang beroperasi dengan baik dan dinilai sehat, baik langsung maupun tidak langsung dapat memberikan perlindungan yang lebih baik kepada nasabah. Namun sayangnya, apabila ditelaah lebih jauh mengenai praktek penyelenggaraan Internet banking masih banyak ditemui adanya hal-hal yang sangat merugikan konsumen, seperti misalnya pencantuman klausula terms and conditions yang hanya memperhatikan kepentingan bank. Hak hak konsumen yang seharusnya dipenuhi oleh bank ternyata belum sepenuhnya mendapat perhatian yang semestinya. Oleh karena itu, sudah sewajarnya apabila bank mulai memperhatikan kepentingan konsumen sebagaimana diamanatkan oleh Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen.

---

The emergence of internet technology has adopted by banks to create the internet banking services. Actually, banks realized that internet banking is hazardous, but hanks considered internet banking as challenges and opportunities to improve their business. Bank Indonesia as banking regulator and overseer created many regulations, included regulations related with internet banking operation. The regulations aim to give the rule for banks, so banks do their business based on prudential banking and good corporate governance. A good business of banks, directly or indirectly, will establish the consumer protection. Unfortunately, if we evaluate more detail about the operation of internet banking, we can find many factors that disservice to many innocent consumers, such as terms and conditions clauses that only created in banking perspective. According to Consumer Protection Law, consumer rights should be established by banks."

"Bank Garansi merupakan produk bank yang memiliki karakteristik yang unik sebagaimana diatur dalam Peraturan Bank Indonesia selaku otoritas perbankan yaitu apabila terjadi cidera janji/wanprestasi langsung dapat dieksekusi tanpa perlu pembuktian terlebih dahulu di muka Hakim (Prinsip Unconditional/tanpa bersyarat). Bank Garansi merupakan salah satu bentuk dari Penanggungan Utang yang diatur dalam Bab 17 Buku III Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata dari Pasal 1820 sampai dengan Pasal 1850. Melalui pelaksanaan Bank Garansi yang seringkali dirasakan memberatkan pihak Principal karena adanya keharusan menyimpan hartanya (cash collateral) yang bersifat mudah dicairkan di Bank sebagai jaminan, dimana harta tersebut dapat digunakan untuk modal kerja Principal. Dari pelaksanaan ini dilihat oleh Surety Company/Perusahaan Asuransi sebagai pangsa pasar besar sebagai jaminan, sehingga diciptakan produk yang merupakan modifikasi/produk turunan dari Surety Bond yaitu Kontra Bank Garansi melalui mekanisme kerjasama dengan Bank. Dalam Kontra Bank Garansi, Principal cukup membayar premi/service charge kepada Surety Company. Sehingga inti dari Kontra Bank Garansi adalah pihak Surety Company menjamin Bank Garansi yang diterbitkan oleh Bank terhadap Principal. Sifat dan kultur dari Kontra Bank Garansi yang juga mengadopsi kultur Bank Garansi pada pelaksanaannya di lapangan tidak sesuai dengan prinsip-prinsip dasar hukum Asuransi terutama jika terjadi klaim dari pihak Obligee (prinsip Indemitas dan Subrogasi) dimana seharusnya pembayaran klaim sebesar nilai kerugian yang benar-benar diderita oleh Obligee. Padahal Kontra Bank Garansi dianggap sebagai produk asuransi, sehingga seharusnya mengikuti kultur dari Surety Bond yang merupakan produk asuransi.

---

Bank Guarantee is one of bank products that has unique characteristics as stipulated by Bank Indonesia as the banking authorities in Indonesia in case of breach of contract/breach of contract can be executed directly without need of proof in front of the Judges (Unconditional clause). Bank Guarantee is form of the Debt Guarantee as stipulated in Chapter 17 Book III of the draft Civil Code from Article 1820 to Article 1850. Through the implementation of the Bank Guarantee which is often perceived aggravating the Principal because of necessity to save his money (cash collateral) which is easily in the bank as collateral, where the property can be used for working capital Principal later. This implementation is seen by the Surety Company/Insurance Company as a large market share as a collateral, so that they created the product that is modified from Surety Bond product which is derived from the Contra Bank Guarantee through the mechanism of cooperation with the Bank. In Contra Bank Guarantee, Principal sufficient to pay premiums / service charge to the Surety Company. So the core of the Contra Bank Guarantee means that the Surety Company guarantees Bank Guarantees issued by Bank of Principal. The culture of the Contra Bank Guarantee is that Bank Guarantee also adopted the culture of their implementation in the field not in accordance with basic principles of insurance law, especially if there is a claim from the Obligee (Indemnity Principles and Subrogation) where should the payment of claims amounting to the value of losses actually suffered by the Obligee. Thus the Contra Bank Guarantee insurance product, it should follow the culture of the Surety Bond which is an insurance product."