Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Hasil Pencarian

Ditemukan 203 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query
cover
"Contents
- Tables
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Glossary
- Map of Indonesia
- 1. An introduction to the issues
- Part 1: Historical, economic, political and social patterns
- 2. Before the 'big bang': decentralization debates and practice in Indonesia, 1949?
99
- 3. Indonesia's decentralization: the rise of local identities and the survival of the
nation-state
- 4. Hares and tortoises: regional development dynamics in Indonesia
- 5. Patterns of regional poverty in the new Indonesia
- Part 2: Decentralization and governance
- 6. Twelve years of fiscal decentralization: a balance sheet
- 7. Local governance and development outcomes
- 8. Decentralization, governance and public service delivery
- 9. What determines the quality of subnational economic governance? Comparing
Indonesia and Vietnam
- Part 3: Local-level perspectives
- 10. Dilemmas of participation: the National Community Empowerment Program
- 11. Governing fragile ecologies: a perspective on forest and land-based
development in the regions
- 12. Explaining regional heterogeneity of poverty: evidence from a decentralized
Indonesia
- Part 4: Migration, cities and connectivity
- 13. Migration patterns: people on the move
- 14. Regional labour markets in 2002?12: limited convergence but integration
nonetheless
- 15. The dynamics of Jabodetabek development: the challenge of urban
governance
- 16. Challenges of implementing logistics reform in Indonesia
- Part 5: Challenges for Indonesia's periphery
- 17. The political impact of carving up Papua
- 18. Development in Papua after special autonomy
- 19. Special autonomy, predatory peace and the resolution of the Aceh conflict
- 20. Aceh's economy: prospects for revival after disaster and war
- Author index
- Subject index
- Indonesia Update Series "
Singapore: Institute of South East Asia Studies, 2014
e20442324
eBooks  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Michael Ewing-Chow
"Decentralisation system in Indonesia was introduced after the fall of the former President Soeharto
with the objective of ensuring good governance and equitable development across all regions in
the country. Unfortunately, the implementation of desentralisasi has been complicated. Some
scholars have suggested that the model was flawed as it did not consider Indonesia’s context of less
developed administrative institutions in the regions. Not only did desentralisasi cause headaches
for the government, it also created confusion for foreign investors. Consequently, it affects the
investment climate in the country and undermines the perception of Indonesia as an attractive
place to invest in. In certain cases, desentralisasi has also led to claims by foreign investors for
investor-State arbitration under Indonesia’s international investment agreements (IIAs). This
paper analyses the problems of desentralisasi in Indonesia, its effects to foreign investors and
suggests ways to alleviate the problems by modifying and using Indonesia’s IIAs effectively.
Setelah jatuhnya rezim Soeharto, sistem pemerintahan desentralisasi mulai diterapkan di
Indonesia dengan tujuan untuk memastikan tata kelola yang baik dan pembangunan yang
adil di seluruh wilayah Republik Indonesia. Sayangnya, penerapan desentralisasi sangatlah
sulit. Beberapa akademisi mengatakan bahwa model sistem desentralisasi yang diterapkan di
Indonesia tidak sesuai dengan situasi di lapangan di Indonesia, khususnya di daerah-daerah
yang belum mempunyai kantor-kantor administratif yang berfungsi dengan baik. Desentralisasi
menimbulkan berbagai masalah bagi pemerintah dan membingungkan para investor asing.
Akibatnya, desentralisasi memperburuk iklim investasi di Indonesia dan menimbulkan persepsi
negatif mengenai Indonesia sebagai tempat berinvestasi. Dalam beberapa kasus tertentu,
desentralisasi juga menyebabkan munculnya tuntutan-tuntutan oleh para investor asing di
arbitrase antara investor dan Pemerintah berdasarkan perjanjian investasi internasional (PII)
Indonesia. Makalah ini menganalisa masalah-masalah yang ditimbulkan oleh desentralisasi di
Indonesia, efek-efeknya bagi para investor asing dan memberikan saran mengenai cara-cara
untuk menangani beberapa masalah tersebut dengan mengubah dan menggunakan PII Indonesia
secara efektif."
University of Indonesia, Faculty of Law, 2015
pdf
Artikel Jurnal  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Tri Hayati
"The adoption of Law Number 22 Year 1999 led to the expansion of regional governments? autonomy,
applying autonomy in the broadest sense of the word, by focusing merely on ?decentralization?,
while disregarding the principle of de-concentration. Governmental affairs submitted based on
decentralization refer to authority by attribution, whereas de-concentration refers to authority by
delegation. Prior to the reform era, the management of mining was based on Law Number 11 Year
1967, whereby the basis of management authority was the classification of excavated materials
namely category a, category b, and category c. Subsequently, with the implementation of the
reform era, Law Number 11 Year 1967 was negated by the adoption of Government Regulation
Number 75 Year 2001, granting mining management authority to the Minister, Governor, Regent
or Mayor concerned in accordance with their authority respectively. As a result of the above, the
concept as provided for in Law Number 11 Year 1967 became inapplicable. This continued to be the
case up to the adoption of Law Number 4 Year 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining, which in
principle adopts the concept which has been adjusted to the concept of granting autonomy to the
regional government as set forth in Law Number 22 Year 1999.
Berlakukannya Undang-undang Nomor 22 Tahun 1999, membawa dampak pembesaran otonomi
pemerintah daerah, terutama pada Kabupaten dan Kota, dengan diterapkannya otonomi seluasluasnya,
dimana asas yang diterapkan hanya ?desentralisasi? semata, tanpa penerapan asas
dekonsentrasi. Urusan pemerintahan yang diserahkan berdasarkan desentralisasi merujuk
pada kewenangan atribusian, sedangkan dekonsentrasi merujuk pada kewenangan delegasian.
Sebelum era reformasi pengelolaan pertambangan didasarkan pada Undang-undang Nomor 11
Tahun 1967, dimana kewenangan pengelolaan didasarkan pada penggolongan bahan galian
golongana, golongan b, dan golongan c. Kemudian setelah berlangsungnya era reformasi, Undangundang
Nomor 11 Tahun 1967 ternegasikan dengan dibentuknya Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor
75 Tahun 2001, yang memberikan kewenangan pengelolaan pertambangan kepada Menteri,
Gubernur, Bupati atau Walikota sesuai kewenangan masing-masing. Dengan demikian konsep
sebagaimana diatur Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 1967 menjadi tidak dapat diterapkan. Hal
ini berlangsung sampai terbitnya Undang-undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 tentang Pertambangan
Mineral dan Batubara, yang pada dasarnya menganut konsep yang disesuaikan dengan konsep
pemberian otonomi kepada pemerintah daerah sebagaimana diatur Undang-undang Nomor 22
Tahun 1999."
University of Indonesia, Faculty of Law, 2014
pdf
Artikel Jurnal  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Eko Prasojo
"Regional proliferation is a policy to improve governance of local governments upon decentralization taken into effect since 2001 in Indonesia in order to get public services in touch to the locals as well as further increases of prosperity level, but it is not necessarily proven as the matter of fact. This article gives a try to critically rethinking problematic situation of governing new municipalities upon proliferation, taking cases from Singkawang City and Bandung Barat Regency, to confirm previous theories. The study uses positivism approach by employing combining qualitative and quantitative method of inquiries through in-depth interviews to various actors, statistical analysis of conditions in comparison between those at the time of proliferation and recent progress, as well as content analysis of important documents. It suggests that regional proliferation in two municipalities implies double-edged impacts; they are opportunities to grasp local development on one side but counterproductive results of much dependency and stagnancy in local service delivery on the other side.

Pemekaran daerah sebagai sebuah kebijakan dalam rangka meningkatkan penyelenggaraan pemerintahan daerah dilakukan sejak 2001 untuk mendekatkan pelayanan publik sekaligus meningkatkan kesejahteraan masyarakat. Sayangnya, ditemukan sejumlah masalah dalam pelaksanaannya. Tulisan ini berupaya secara kritis memetakan kembali situasi problematis penyelenggaraan pemerintahan daerah otonom baru hasil pemekaran yaitu Kota Singkawang dan Kabupaten Bandung Barat. Penelitian dilakukan dengan pendekatan positivis dan metode kuantitatif-kualitatif melalui wawancara mendalam kepada sejumlah pihak, penelusuran data statistik mengenai indikator kelayakan daerah saat pemekaran dilakukan dan penelusuran data yang sama pada saat penelitian dilakukan untuk dijadikan pembanding, serta content analysis terhadap dokumen-dokumen pendukung. Hasi penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemekaran daerah memiliki dampak ganda, di satu sisi merupakan kesempatan untuk meningkatkan pembangunan daerah, di sisi lain membawa hasil yang bersifat kontraproduktif, yaitu ketergantungan dan stagnasi dalam penyelenggaraan pelayanan publik."
Depok: Departement of Administration Sciences, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences,Universitas Indonesia, 2012
AJ-Pdf
Artikel Jurnal  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Agustinus Fatem
"Abstract. Community empowerment has ample opportunity for accomplishment in the decentralization era and through the implementation of regional and special autonomy in Papua. This research analyzes the influence of community empowerment on community participation in village development in the Jayapura Regency and establishes a model for community empowerment and participation in regional development, using the quantitative approach. Primary data is collected from respondents through questionnaires, interview guides, and on-site observation. Respondents are chosen using the cluster sampling technique (with two or more respondents) to determine sample areas (districts and villages), and respondents from sample villages are chosen using the proportional random sampling technique. Field data is processed and analyzed using the structural path analysis technique and the qualitative-descriptive analysis. According to research findings: (1) participation in village development is influenced by community empowerment, which is shaped by conducive situation, community capacity, and community protection (2) the participatory dimensions in village development are planning, implementation, utilization, and maintenance, and evaluation is partially determined by the significant influence from conducive situation and community capacity. It is our hope that this review on community empowerment and participation in development can contribute to transforming community members into the main agents of development, therefore leading to a development that is ?from, by, and for? the community."
2011
J-Pdf
Artikel Jurnal  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Tjip Ismail
"Abstract. Together with the implementation of local autonomy, Indonesia implemented the concept of fiscal decentralization,
manifested through the local government’s authority to collect tax and retribution. The implementation process of such policy,
however, still triggers certain problems, such as people’s perception of tax as burdensome obligation without any right of
counter-achievement (compensation) for its payment. This research aims to study the paradigm change of local tax, viewed
from three aspects: (1) the paradigm shift of local tax in Indonesian governance system, (2) new paradigm of local tax, (3) the
effect of local tax paradigm change toward local developments. The approach used is qualitative with data collection techniques
of observation, in-depth interview and literature study. The result shows that the paradigm change of local tax is necessary since
there is a spectrum of democracy development in society due to the fact that the revenue from local retribution is less than the
revenue from local tax. As a consequence, local tax paradigm should be altered i.e. local tax must give counter-achievement
for the related tax sectors. Hence, local tax paradigm change shall increasingly influence the taxpayers to obediently fulfill their
obligation of paying local tax since they may directly enjoy the benefit of their tax."
2011
PDF
Artikel Jurnal  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Teguh Dartanto
"From January 1, 2001, when new autonomy laws were implemented, lndonesia began to move toward decentralization of what had been a highly decentralized. This policy adopts two complimentary laws. Law No.22/1999, which basically the devolution policy, has been accompanied by La No.25/1999, which basically reflect that decentralization policy in Indonesia has adopted the concept of ?money follows function?.
Law No.25/1999 describe the fiscal decentralization process that will create a new intergovernmental transfer scheme between the central government and local government. Some of items in the law were really new ones such as the natural resources revenue sharing, income tax sharing, general allocation fund (OAF) and specifics allocation fund (SAF). The policies oftax and natural resource revenue sharing can result in fiscal imbalance among regions. Tax and natural resources revenue sharing will benefit only to urbanized and natural resources rich regions Because of it, Central Government created General Allocation Funds. This fund has block grant characteristic and will be given to regions by fiscal gap conception. The purpose is to equalize fiscal capacity among regions that in turn also can reduce disparity among them.
The Simultaneous Macro Econometric Model is made for analyzing the fiscal decentralization impact to economic growth and region disparity. The policy simulation in this model used transfer fund from central government such as Tax Revenue Sharing, Natural Resource Revenue Sharing and General Allocation Fund. The simulation is carried out to see the optimality of various possible existing policies. The optimality is measured by evaluating the high rate of economic growth and low disparity."
2003
AJ-Pdf
Artikel Jurnal  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Andi Sumar Karman
"This aritcle discusses about the phenomenon of globalization involving two fishermencommunities, the Tomalou fishermen in Tidore islands and the Philipines fishermen. Bothof them sail and hunt in the same seawater zone, constructed and formed as a transborderterritory between Indonesia and the Philipines. The natural resources management systemthrough decentralization should ensure the exsistence of local fishermen (Tomalou) to gainmarine (fish) resources, secured by government without interference by the Philipine fishermen.The data in this paper has been analyzed with several transborder theories. As a result, thispaper shows that the state representated by the regional government has failed to protect thelocal fishermen (Tomalou) and ensure in continued presence in achiving welfare from the searesources."
2014
PDF
Artikel Jurnal  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Lugina Setyawati Setiono
"This paper explained the issue of inequality which appears in the process of democratization through the analysis of contestation, negotiation, and the reconstruction of Riau?s identity. Ideally, democratic principles respect equality; however, identity expresses inequality because it defines who is dominant and subordinate in a certain social group through ethnic category and gender identity. It separates the insiders and outsiders with different rights through cultural idioms. Moreover, the identity is not merely applied in the private domain, but also in the public sphere. This paper resulted from research conducted in Riau Province in a periode of decentralization process. The findings shown that In daily practice the collective sentiments manifested in the notion of ?Putra Daerah? may create problems, as this notion is not only used as a social category to define collective boundaries, but also as a strategic tool to control access to political and economic power in Riau. Quoting Worsley, Cultural traits are not absolute or simply intellectual categories, but are invoked to provide identities which legitimize claims to rights. They are strategies or weapons in competitions over scarce social goods Worsley (1994)."
2011
PDF
Artikel Jurnal  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
New Jersey : World Scientific, 2016
339.42 DEC
Buku Teks  Universitas Indonesia Library
<<   3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12   >>