Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Kajian pengelolaan perpustakaan mencakup sistem pengelolaan secara umum, peran dan fungsi perpustakaan, dan hambatan-hambatan dalam pengelolaan perpustakaan. Karena penelitian dalam pengelolaan perpustakaan di lembaga perguruan tinggi swasta masih langka, maka penelitian ini memfokuskan pada pengelolaan perpustakaan di lembaga perguruan tinggi swasta tersebut. Penelitian ini mempunyai nilai yang sangat penting dalam kaitannya dengan peran dan fungsi perpustakaan di perguruan tinggi swasta.Tujuan penelitian ini secara umum untuk menggambarkan sistem pengelolaan perpustakaan pada delapan universitas swasta, khususnya pengelolaan koleksi perpustakaan, layanan, sarana dan prasarana, sumber daya manusia, dan sumberdaya finansial, dan juga mengidentifikasi peran masing-masing perpustakaan universitas tersebut.Penelitian ini dilaksanakan pada bulan April 2002 sampai bulan Agusuts 2002, melibatkan delapan universitas swasta di DKI Jakarta sebagai sampel, terdiri dari Unika Atmajaya, Universitas Nasional, Universitas Darma Persada, Universitas Krisnadwipayana, Universitas Bina Nusantara, Universitas Islam As-Syafiiyah, Universitas Tarumanegara, dan Universitas 17 Agustus 1945. Data diambil dari survai 520 responden mencakup pimpinan perpustakaan, tenaga administrasi, staf pengajar dan mahasiswa. Instrumen pengumpulan data melalui kuesioner dan pedoman wawancara.Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa [1] secara umum sistem pengelolaan perpustakaan universitas swasta di DKI Jakarta menunjukkan tidak berfungsi dengan baik. Khususnya alur pengelolaan termasuk di dalamnya perencanaan, pengorganisasian, pelaksanaan, pengawasan dan penilaian tidak berkelanjutan, karena kurangnya dukungan lembaga dan kurangnya sumber daya manusia, dan sumber daya finansial. Oleh sebab itu para pimpinan perpustakaan mempunyai kesulitan dalam melaksanakan tujuan program-programnya untuk memfungsikan perpustakaan universitas swasta tersebut. Akibatnya, perpustakaan tidak dapat memenuhi hasil yang diharapkan dalam memberikan pelayanan terhadap pengguna informasi, bahkan dalam kalangan perguruan tinggi tersebut. [2] perpustakaan masih dianggap mempunyai peran dan fungsi penunjang (peripheral) dalam kehidupan akademik universitas swasta. Perpustakaan hanya merupakan unit penunjang, sebagai ganti unit sumber untuk kegiatan akademik yang terdapat dalam universitas swasta. Sementara itu, perpustakaan dalam keadaan yang kurang menguntungkan karena kurang memperoleh dukungan kebijakan lembaga, padahal universitas begitu juga pengguna perpustakaan mempunyai tuntutan yang tinggi terhadap layanan perpustakaan yang cepat, mencakup koleksi perpustakaan, berbagai layanan pengguna, fasilitas perpustakaan, sarana dan prasarana dan jaringan kerjasama antar perpustakaan.

---

The area of library management comprises of management system in general, role and function of a library, and constraints in the management of a library. Since research in the area of library management is rare, this research, focusing on library management of private higher education institutions, is highly important.

In general, the purpose of this research is to illustrate the library management systems on eight private universities, specifically the management of library collection, services, structure and infrastructure, human and financial resources, and to identify the role of each library within its university.

The study was conducted from April 2002 up to August 2002, involving eight private universities in Jakarta as sample institutions, i.e., Unika Atmajaya, Universitas Nasional, Universitas Darma Persada, Universitas Krisnadwipayana,Universitas Bina Nusantara, Universitas Islam As-Syafiiyah, Universitas Tarumanegara, dan Universitas 17 Agustus 1945. Data were surveyed from 520 respondents, i.e., library managers, administrative staff, academic staff and students. The data collection instruments were questionnaire and interview guidelines.

Results of the study show that [1] in general, the management of library system in private universities in Jakarta tends to be not functioning well. Specifically, the management cycle (planning, organization, actuating, controlling and evaluation) was not followed through, due to lack of support from the institution, and lack of human and financial resources. Therefore, library managers were having difficulties in implementing its programs aiming toward the functioning of their libraries within the private universities. Thus far, the library was not able to fulfill its expected performance in serving the users' needs of information, even within its own university. [2] Library was still perceived to have a peripheral role and function in the academic life of private universities. It was only a supporting unit, instead of a resource unit for academic interactivities to take place within a university. While the library have some disadvantages of lacking support from institutional policy and support, universities, as well as library users demanded high and rapid improvement of library services, including library collection, variety of users' services, library facilities, structure and infrastructure, and networking among libraries."

"Ce livre examine le rôle des universités et des instituts de recherche nationaux dans le développement économique et social. En réunissant des textes rendant compte d’initiatives et d’innovations dans diverses régions du monde, notamment en Chine, en Europe de l’Est, en Amérique latine, en Scandinavie, en Asie du Sud-Est, en Afrique subsaharienne et en Europe de l’Ouest, l’ouvrage brosse un tableau qui est d’actualité et qui intéressera tant les responsables des politiques et les administrateurs d’universités que les leaders économiques et sociaux et les chercheurs."

"This book, based on a survey of academics in 19 nations and conducted by leading global scholars, is a thorough sounding of the attitudes of academics to their working environment. As the post-WWII liberal consensus crumbles, higher education is increasingly viewed as a private and personal investment in individual social mobility rather than as a public good and, ipso facto, a responsibility of public authorities. The incursion of corporate culture into academe, with its ?stakeholders?, ?performance pay? and obsession with ?competitiveness? is a matter of bitter debate, with some arguing that short-termism is obviating epoch-making research which by definition requires patience and persistence in the face of the risk of failure."