Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Pasca reformasi 1998, terjadi pertambahan jumlah partai politik yang signifikan di Indonesia, diikuti juga dengan pertambahan jumlah gerakan underbow nya. Termasuk disini Kelompok Pergerakan Mahasiswa UI yang meliputi ; Kelompok Tarbiyah, Himpunan Mahasiswa Islam, dan Pergerakan Mahasiswa Islam Indonesia, yang cukup dominan. Tahun 2012, terjadi fenomena calon tunggal dalam Pemira IKM UI 2012 yang mengindikasikan terjadinya dominasi oleh salah satu kelompok dalam persaingan politik yang terjadi. Penelitian ini membahas perubahan teritorial persaingan politik antar kelompok pergerakan mahasiswa di UI yang terjadi pada Tahun 2012. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan territoality (upaya menguasai wilayah) dan teritorial yang meliputi Heartland (Wilayah jantung pergerakan) dan Rimland (Wilayah gerak pergerakan) tiap-tiap kelompok. Penelitian ini bersifat kualitatif dengan analisis isi, meaning, dan life history dari perspektif spasial. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa teritorial persaingan politik didominasi oleh kelompok yang berhasil memiliki territoality lebih besar sehingga mampu menguasai teritorial heartland dan rimland lebih luas. Territoality lebih besar dapat dicapai dengan menguasai organisasi intra kampus. Teritorial persaingan politik terkuat berada di wilayah yang heartland antar kelompoknya berada di area yang sama, hal ini terjadi di wilayah Fakultas Hukum (FH). Pemira 2012 menghasilkan fakta bahwa kemenangannya masih didominasi oleh salah satu kelompok sehingga membuat perubahan teritorial persaingan yang terjadi tergolong rendah. Hal ini berdampak terhadap dua kelompok lainnya yang mengalami stagnasi sehingga menyebabkan pola keruangan heartland-rimland mereka tidak berubah sama sekali.

---

After The Reform of 1998, there was added a significant number of political parties in Indonesia, followed by the increase of its underbow movement. Included here, Group of UI Student Movement; Tarbiyah Group, The Muslim Students Association, and The Indonesian Islamic Students Movement, which is quite dominant. In 2012, there was a phenomenon of single candidates in The Student Election of UI in 2012, which indicates domination by one group in a political competition going on. This study discusses the territotial change of political competition among a group of UI students movement that occurred in 2012. By using the approach territoality (effort control of the territory) and territories that include Heartland (area of main movement) and Rimland (regional motion movement) of each group. This study use qualitative method whose content, meaning, and life history analysis with a spatial perspective. The results showed that the territorial of political competition is dominated by the groups which have a greater territoality so as to master the wider territorial heartland and rimland. Greater territoality can be achieved with master intra-campus organization. The territorial of strongest political competition is located in region whose each of group's heartland areas are in the same area, this is the case in the Faculty of Law (FH). UI Student Election 2012 resulted in the fact that the victory is still dominated by one group, it makes the territotial change of political competition is going low. This has implications for the other two groups that have stagnated, causing spatial patterns of their heartland-Rimland have not changed at all."

"The empirical approach to political science -- Beginning the research process : identifying a research topic, developing research questions, and reviewing the literature -- The building blocks of social scientific research : hypotheses, concepts, and variables -- The building blocks of social scientific research : measurement -- Research design : making causal inferences -- Sampling -- Making empirical observations : direct and indirect observation -- Document analysis : using the written record -- Survey research and interviewing -- Making sense of data : first steps -- Statistical inference -- Investigating relationships between two variables -- Multivariate analysis -- The research report : an annotated example"

"This is the first collaborative volume to place Shakespeare’s works within the landscape of early modern political thought. Until recently, literary scholars have not generally treated Shakespeare as a participant in the political thought of his time, unlike his contemporaries Ben Jonson, Edmund Spenser and Philip Sidney. At the same time, historians of political thought have rarely turned their attention to major works of poetry and drama. A distinguished international and interdisciplinary team of contributors examines the full range of Shakespeare’s writings in order to challenge conventional interpretations of plays central to the canon, such as Hamlet ; open up novel perspectives on works rarely considered to be political, such as the Sonnets ; and focus on those that have been largely neglected, such as The Merry Wives of Windsor. The result is a coherent and challenging portrait of Shakespeare’s distinctive engagement with the characteristic questions of early modern political thought : among them, corruption and citizenship, education and persuasion, the hazards of the court and the demands of the commonwealth."