Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKTesis ini membahas tentang implikasi Letter of Intent (LoI) IMF dalam kebijakanimpor beras Indonesia periode 2004-2010. Pemerintah Indonesia menandatanganiLoI dengan IMF saat Indonesia mengalami krisis ekonomi tahun 1997 sehinggaharus meminta bantuan dari IMF. Selama empat periode pemerintahan (1997-2003), IMF memberikan tekanan pada pemerintah untuk melakukan liberalisasi,privatisasi, dan deregulasi di berbagai sektor, salah satunya adalah sektorperberasan. Akibat liberalisasi tersebut, jumlah impor beras yang masuk keIndonesia meningkat dengan tajam. Namun pasca LoI berakhir, pemerintah tetapmempertahankan kebijakan impor beras khususnya untuk memenuhi stokcadangan beras nasional. Maka pertanyaan penelitian dalam tesis ini adalahmengapa pemerintah tetap melakukan kebijakan impor beras pasca LoI IMFberakhir dan pihak mana yang diuntungkan dengan impor beras tersebut.Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan desain deskriptif analitis.Hasil penelitian memaparkan terdapat tiga implikasi LoI IMF yang masihdirasakan sampai saat ini yaitu terbukanya pasar beras dalam negeri, privatisasiBULOG, dan hilangnya subsidi KLBI. Pemerintah juga memiliki komitmeninternasional dengan WTO untuk membuka pasar bagi beras impor minimalsebanyak 70.000 ton beras per tahun. Di lain pihak, adanya preferensi pemerintahuntuk mempertahankan kebijakan tersebut karena impor beras memberikaninsentif yang besar bagi pelaksana impor, yaitu BULOG. Pihak yang diuntungkandari impor ini selain BULOG, adalah negara eksportir beras yaitu Thailand danVietnam. Untuk menghadapi liberalisasi strategi pemerintah perlu meningkatkanpembangunan infrastruktur pertanian, penguatan kelembagaan tata niaga beras,serta menyusun kebijakan perberasan yang solid dan terkoordinasi dengan baikantar lembaga terkait.

---

AbstractThis study discusses about the implications of the IMF Letter of Intent (LoI) inIndonesian rice import policy especially in the period 2004-2010. The governmentof Indonesia signed the LoI with the IMF when Indonesia hit by economic crisisin 1997 and requested an assistance from the IMF. During the four periods ofreign (1997-2003), the IMF put pressure on governments to apply liberalization,privatization, and deregulation in various sectors, one of which is the rice sector.As the result, the amount of rice imports into Indonesia increased sharply. Afterthe LoI ended, the government is still maintaining rice import policy, especially tomeet the national rice reserve stock. Then the research question is why thegovernment continues to conduct rice import policy after the LoI IMF ended andwhich party get benefits from the imported rice.This research is a qualitative research with a descriptive analysis design. Theresults found that there are three implications of the LoI IMF which is theliberalization of domestic rice market, privatization of BULOG, and the abolitionof KLBI. The government also has international commitments to the WTO toopen minimum market access of 70,000 tons of rice per year. On the other side,the government's preference to maintain the import policy because the policyprovides strong incentives for BULOG as an STE in importing rice. The partywho gets the benefits from the imported rice are the rice exporting country such asThailand and Vietnam, and BULOG. The researcher suggests several strategiesthat can be implemented by the government that is to improve the development ofagricultural infrastructure, strengthen the rice marketing institutional, and developa firm and well-coordinated rice policy among relevant institutions."

"Machine generated contents note: pt. I Objectives and political economy of social protection reforms1.Rescuing social protection from the poverty trap: new programmes and historical lessons /​ Sarah Cook2.Social protection for poverty reduction: approaches, effectiveness and challenges /​ Armando Barrientos3.The political economy of social protection reforms in developing countries: what is to be explained and how? /​ Katja Bender4.Social cohesion: does it matter for growth and development? /​ Annalisa Prizzonpt. II The legal framework of social protection reforms5.The human rights-based approach to social protection /​ Markus Kaltenborn6.The role of law and legal institutions in the reform of social protection systems: experiences from South Africa /​ Ockert Dupper7.The role of the law of regional organisations in reforms of social protection systems: portability of social security benefits in the East African Community /​ Tulia AcksonContents note continued: 8.Reforms of social protection systems in Latin America: the legal context /​ Lorena Ossio Bustillospt. III Political feasibility of basic social protection9.Attitudes towards hard work and redistributive preferences in developing countries /​ Anil Duman10.Populous, precarious - protected? The paradox of social security for South Asian agricultural workers /​ Karin Astrid Siegmann11.Whom to target - an obvious choice? /​ Franziska Gassmann12.003E How to target: overview on current targeting methods in social protection /​ Christian Pfleidererpt. IV Social protection systems: between fragmentation and integration13.Building social protection and labour systems /​ Ian Walker14.The political economy of social protection reforms in Indonesia /​ Bambang Widianto15.Social protection reforms in Vietnam: experiences and challenges /​ Matthias MeissnerContents note continued: 16.Social protection: political reform and policy innovations in South Asia /​ Gabriele Koehler17.Caring for the urban middle class: the political economy of social protection in Arab countries /​ Markus Loewept. V Social protection reforms: international contexts18.Building national social protection floors and social security systems: the ILO's two-dimensional social security strategy /​ Christina Behrendt19.Developing countries' social protection measures in reaction to the global economic and financial crisis /​ Nina Thelen20.Social protection and the four horsemen of the donor apocalypse /​ Nicholas Freeland."