Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Penelitian ini menggunakan teori Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM) mengkaji pemberian pesan dengan pendekatan rasa takut terhadap minat perilaku vaksinasi Covid-19 dalam konteks Indonesia. Penelitian ini mengkaji pengaruh pemberian kampanye ancaman tinggi dengan efikasi tinggi serta kampanye ancaman tinggi dengan efikasi rendah terhadap minat perilaku vaksinasi. Melalui metode eksperimen desain antar kelompok dengan kelompok kontrol yang mendapat perlakuan berbeda kemudian diuji dengan Uji F (ANOVA) satu jalur. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kampanye ancaman tinggi dengan efikasi tinggi terbukti memicu minat perilaku vaksinasi Covid-19 pro-aktif yakni signifikan di minat perilaku vaksinasi individu, minat pencarian informasi, minat daftar vaksin dan minat mengajak lingkungan untuk vaksin. Sementara kampanye ancaman tinggi dengan efikasi rendah hanya memicu minat perilaku vaksinasi Covid-19 pasif yaitu signifikan di minat perilaku vaksinasi individu namun, tidak di variabel minat pencarian informasi, minat daftar vaksin dan minat mengajak lingkungan untuk vaksin. ......Employing Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM) theory, this papers examined the delivery of vaccination campaign with a fear appeal to the behavioral intention of Covid-19 vaccination in Indonesia context. This study examines the application of high threat and high efficacy campaigns also low threat and low efficacy campaigns on vaccination behavioral intention. Through experimental between-subject post – test only control groups design that received different treatment then tested with the one-way F Test (ANOVA). The results showed that high threat and high efficacy campaigns were proven to trigger pro-active Covid-19 vaccination behavioral intention, which was significant in individual vaccination behavioral intention, information seeking intention, vaccine registration intention and ask colleagues for vaccines intention. While high threat and low efficacy campaigns only trigger passive Covid-19 vaccination behavioral intention, which is significant in individual vaccination behavioral intention, but not in information seeking intention, vaccine registration intention and ask colleagues for vaccines intention.

Abstrak :
ABSTRACT
Penelitian ini menguji pengaruh faktor sosiologis agama, suku, jenis kelamin, dukungan primary group, faktor psikologis orientasi isu, orientasi kandidat, identifikasi partai politik, faktor pilihan rasional prospective voting, retrospective voting dan faktor politik uang terhadap perilaku memilih generasi Z kelahiran 1995-2009. Riset ini menggunakan metode eksperimen dengan populasi penelitian yang dapat dijangkau peneliti yakni, mahasiswa-mahasiswi aktif S1 FISIP UI angkatan 2014-2017. Hasilnya faktor yang berpengaruh signifikan meningkatkan kecenderungan memilih adalah orientasi kandidat-santun, orientasi isu-sama, identifikasi partai politik-sama, tidak melakukan-politik uang, prospective issues-beri janji, retrospective issues-cemerlang, jenis kelamin laki-laki, agama sama. Sementara faktor yang berpengaruh signifikan menurunkan kecenderungan memilih adalah orientasi kandidat-arogan, retrospective issues-kontroversial, orientasi isu-beda, identifikasi partai politik-beda, prospective issues-tidak janji.

---

ABSTRACT
This study examines the influence of sociological factors religion, ethnicity, gender, primary group support , psychological factors issue orientation, candidate orientation, political party identification, rational choice factors prospective voting, retrospective voting and money politics factor on voting behavior of generation Z birth 1995 2009. This research uses experimental methods with accessible experimentally population i.e. FISIP UI undergraduate student batch 2014 2017. Result of the factors that significantly increase tendency to vote are candidate orientation urbane, issue orientation same, political party identification same, not doing money politics, prospective issues give promises, retrospective issues brilliant, gender male, religion same. While factors that significantly decrease tendency to vote are candidate orientation arrogant, retrospective issue controversial, issue orientation different, political party identification different, prospective issues no promises.