Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemilik Satuan RumahSusun yang juga Merupakan Pelaku Pembangunan RumahSusun atas Tindakan Perhimpunan Penghuni terkaitdengan Penggunaan Bagian Bersama dalam Rumah Susun Kajian Yuridis tentang Putusan Mahkamah AgungNomor 187 K/Pdt./2016 Tesis ini membahas mengenai perlindungan hukum terhadap pemilik satuanrumah susun yang juga merupakan pelaku pembangunan rumah susun. DalamUndang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2011 tentang Rumah Susun serta PeraturanPemerintah Nomor 4 Tahun 1988 tentang Rumah Susun, dijelaskan mengenaihak-hak yang dimiliki oleh penghuni satuan rumah susun terhadap tanah bersama,benda bersama bagian bersama dimana perhimpunan penghuni rumah susundiberikan kewenangan untuk mengelola tanah bersama, benda bersama dan bagianbersama tersebut. Dalam tesis ini dijabarkan mengenai pemanfaatan bagianbersama oleh PT Intersatria Budi Perkasa Mulia berupa akses masuk dan keluardari satuan rumah susun miliknya pada Apartemen Casablanca Mansion dimanaPerhimpunan Penghuni Rumah Susun Hunian Apartemen Casablanca menutupakses tersebut dengan membangun dinding gypsum yang mengakibatkan hakakses PT Intersatria Budi Perkasa Mulia menjadi terganggu. Untuk itu, penulismeneliti bagaimana sebetulnya kewenangan yang dimiliki perhimpunan penghuniterhadap pengelolaan bagian bersama pada rumah susun serta bagaimanaperlakuan yang seharusnya diperoleh oleh pemilik satuan rumah susun yang jugamerupakan pelaku pembangunan rumah susun terhadap bagian bersama tersebut.Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode kepustakaan yang bersifatyuridis normatif. Dari hasil penelitian, penulis mendapatkan bahwa perhimpunanpenghuni dalam melakukan pengelolaan bagian bersama tetap harus mengacukepada pertelaan yang telah disahkan oleh pemerintah sehingga segala tindakanyang bersifat mengurangi bagian bersama merupakan suatu tindakan yangmenyalahi ketentuan. Selain itu, sekalipun penghuni rumah susun merupakanpelaku pembangunan rumah susun tetapi ia tetap dianggap sebagai penghunisatuan rumah susun yang memiliki hak untuk menjadi anggota dan tunduk padaperaturan yang diberlakukan oleh perhimpunan penghuni rumah susun.Kata kunci: rumah susun, penghuni, perhimpunan penghuni, pelakupembangunan, bagian bersama

---

Law Protection to the Owner of the Apartment Unit whichis also the Developer of the Apartment from the Act of theResidents Association for the Use of Shared Part in theApartment Juridical Review to the Decision of SupremeCourt Number 187 K Pdt. 2016 This thesis discusses about law protection to the owner of apartment unit which isalso the developer of the apartment itself. Law Number 20 of 2011 concerningApartment and Government Regulation Number 4 of 1988 concerning Apartment,describe the rights owned by the resident of apartment unit to the shared lands,shared goods and shared part in which the residents association is granted therights to manage such shared lands, shared goods and shared parts. This thesisanalyzes the use of shared part by PT Intersatria Budi Perkasa Mulia for entry andexit access from its apartment units in Apartment Casablanca Mansion where thePerhimpunan Penghuni Rumah Susun Hunian of Apartment Casablanca Mansionas the residents association had closed such entry and exit access by constructingthe gypsum wall which caused the access right of PT Intersatria Budi PerkasaMulia was interfered. By this thesis, the author reviews on how is the authority ofthe residents association in managing the shared part in the apartment and alsohow is the treatment which shall be received by the resident which is also thedeveloper of the apartment to such shared part. From the review, it is known thatthe residents association in managing the shared part shall always refer to thedescription as built drawing which was validated by the government so that allactions in the form of reducing the shared part will be considered as violating theprovision. Further, even though the resident is also the developer of apartment,they have the rights to be treated as a regular resident which having the right tobecome a member and subject to the applicable policies determined by theresidents association.Keywords apartment, resident, residents association, developer, shared part"

"[ABSTRAKSkripsi ini membahas mengenai pelaksanaan eksekusi jaminan benda tetap berupa hipotik kapal laut dan hak tanggungan atas tanah dalam hal kepailitan. Pada umumnya pelaksanaan eksekusi harta pailit dilakukan oleh Kurator sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (“UUK-PKPU”). Akan tetapi UUK-PKPU memberikan kewenangan kepada kreditur pemegang hak jaminan untuk dapat mengeksekusi haknya seolah-olah tidak terjadi kepailitan, dimana ketentuan Pasal tersebut sejalan dengan diakuinya hak separatis dari pemegang jaminan sebagaimana diatur dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Dalam pelaksanaan eksekusi hipotik kapal laut dalam kepailitan PT Putrajaya Offshore Lines dan pelaksanaan eksekusi hak tanggungan atas tanah dalam kepailitan PT Kepsonic Indonesia, masing-masing pelaksanaan eksekusinya memiliki hambatan dan resiko tersendiri. Hambatan dan resiko tersebut patut untuk diulas lebih mendalam dikarenakan kedua obyek jaminan tersebut merupakan obyek yang sering dijadikan jaminan pelunasan utang kepada bank dan dapat ditemui dalam beberapa kasus kepailitan. Untuk itu penulis akan meneliti bagaimana pelaksanaan eksekusi benda tetap dan hambatan-hambatan yang dimiliki dalam kasus kepailitan PT Putrajaya Offshore Lines dan kasus kepailitan PT Kepsonic Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian kepustakaan yang bersifat yuridis normatif. Dari hasil penelitian, penulis mendapatkan bahwa pelaksanaan eksekusi jaminan benda tetap berupa hipotik kapal laut dan hak tanggungan atas tanah, masing-masing memiliki resikonya tersendiri sehingga kreditur pemegang jaminan perlu memperhitungkan potensi ancaman dan resiko yang dapat muncul dalam pelaksanaan eksekusi tersebut, sebelum memutuskan untuk melakukan eksekusi sendiri dengan pembatasan-pembatasan sebagaimana diatur dalam UUK-PKPU atau melalui kurator.

---

ABSTRACTThis thesis discusses about the execution of fixed objects securities in the form of hypothec over ships and security right over lands in the event of bankruptcy. In general, curator is authorized to perform the execution of bankruptcy assets in accordance with the Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payments (“Bankruptcy Law”). However, the Bankruptcy Law gives an authority to the secured creditors to execute their rights as if the bankruptcy does not occur. In the execution of Hypothec over Ships of PT Putrajaya Offshore Lines’s bankruptcy case and the execution of security right over lands and buildings of PT Kepsonic Indonesia’s bankruptcy case, each execution has its own obstacles and risks. Such obstacles and risks are ought to be reviewed because both of security objects are often to be used as security under loan agreement with the bank and such security objects are often to be found in several bankruptcy cases. Therefore, the writer hereby researches on how the execution of the fixed assets and its obstacles in the case of PT Putrajaya Offshore Lines and PT Kepsonic Indonesia’s bankruptcy. The method of the research is using literature method based on juridical normative basis. The writer found that as the result of this research, the implementation of execution of fixed assets securities either in the form of mortgage over ships or security right over lands and buildings have its own risks and therefore the secured creditor needs to calculate the potential obstacles and risks before deciding to perform the execution by itself with the limitation as stipulated in the Bankruptcy Law or deliver it to the curator., This thesis discusses about the execution of fixed objects securities in the form of hypothec over ships and security right over lands in the event of bankruptcy. In general, curator is authorized to perform the execution of bankruptcy assets in accordance with the Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payments (“Bankruptcy Law”). However, the Bankruptcy Law gives an authority to the secured creditors to execute their rights as if the bankruptcy does not occur. In the execution of Hypothec over Ships of PT Putrajaya Offshore Lines’s bankruptcy case and the execution of security right over lands and buildings of PT Kepsonic Indonesia’s bankruptcy case, each execution has its own obstacles and risks. Such obstacles and risks are ought to be reviewed because both of security objects are often to be used as security under loan agreement with the bank and such security objects are often to be found in several bankruptcy cases. Therefore, the writer hereby researches on how the execution of the fixed assets and its obstacles in the case of PT Putrajaya Offshore Lines and PT Kepsonic Indonesia’s bankruptcy. The method of the research is using literature method based on juridical normative basis. The writer found that as the result of this research, the implementation of execution of fixed assets securities either in the form of mortgage over ships or security right over lands and buildings have its own risks and therefore the secured creditor needs to calculate the potential obstacles and risks before deciding to perform the execution by itself with the limitation as stipulated in the Bankruptcy Law or deliver it to the curator.]"