Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[Pertambangan merupakan bidang usaha yang sedang diminati oleh para investor saat ini. Akan tetapi usaha pertambangan memiliki tingkat resiko tinggi (high risk), memerlukan modal besar (high cost) dan menggunakan teknologi modern (modern technology) selain itu kegiatan pertambangan juga memiliki kewajiban-kewajiban berupa Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak yang harus dipenuhi kepada Negara. Dan setelah kewajiban kepada Negara dipenuhi, masih ada satu kewajiban yang tidak kalah pentingnya yaitu menyelesaikan sebagian atau seluruh hak atas tanah dalam Wilayah Izin Usaha Pertambangan (WIUP) untuk kegiatan usahanya dengan pemegang hak tanah sebagaimana ditetapkan dalam Pasal 135 Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 tentang Mineral dan Batubara. Kewajiban inilah yang menjadi puncak permasalahannya, karena pengusaha tambang yang telah selesai melakukan seluruh kewajibannya dan kemudian hendak mengajukan hak atas tanah menurut ketentuan Pasal 137 Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 tentang Mineral dan Batubara tertunda oleh karena penunjukan kawasan hutan yang tidak berujung pada suatu kepastian antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintah Daerah sehingga mengakibatkan seluruh aktivitas di kantor pertanahan tidak berjalan semestinya karena tidak diketahuinya kawasan mana yang diperbolehkan untuk diberikan Hak atas Tanah dan kawasan mana yang tidak diperbolehkan. Oleh karena proses pendaftaran tanah untuk mendapatkan Sertipikat tidak dapat dipenuhi, maka Pemegang Izin Usaha Pertambangan Operasi Produksi (IUP-OP) hanya berbekal dengan Surat Pernyataan Pelepasan Hak dari Penguasa Tanah sebagai tanda bukti penguasaannya. Surat tersebut dapat digunakan sebagai alat pembuktian walaupun tidak kuat seperti halnya Sertipikat. Selain itu juga perlindungan hukum diberikan kepada pemegang IUP-OP oleh karena izin-izin terkait lainnya untuk mendukung kegiatan operasional tambangnya sudah diterbitkan oleh instansi pemerintah yang sebelumnya telah diperoleh melalui prosedur yang benar yang telah ditetapkan dalam peraturan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitan ini bersifat preskriptif analitis karena penulis ingin menjelaskan dan memberikan solusi atau jalan keluar bagi pemegang IUP-OP menghadapi gugatan dari pihak lain. Dan diharapkan kedepannya adanya suatu hubungan kerja yang baik antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintah Daerah dalam menetapkan suatu aturan sebelum diberlakukan demi menghindari timbulnya permasalahan-permasalahan yang dapat merugikan pihak pengusaha tambang dan Negara.

---

Mining is the business fields that are in demand by investors today. However, mining has a high risk level, require large capital and using modern technology, and there is still have obligations in the form of tax state revenue that must be met to the State. And having fulfilled the obligation to the State, there is another obligation that still need to be fulfilled by completing some or all of the rights in land acquisition in the Wilayah Izin Usaha Pertambangan (WIUP) for its business activities with the holders of land rights as defined in Article 135 of Law No. 4 of 2009 on Mineral and Coal. That Obligation becomes the peak of mining problem, because mining entrepreneurs who have completed all of its obligations and then want to apply for the right to land pursuant to Article 137 of Law No. 4 of 2009 on Mineral and Coal was delayed because of the designation of forest areas do not lead to a certainty between the Central Government and Local Government, which had caused resulting in the entire activity in the land office does not run properly because of the uncertainty where the area is allowed to be given Right for the Land and which one is not allowed. Therefore, land registration processing to obtain Certificates can not be met, then holders of Izin Usaha Pertambangan Operasi Produksi (IUP-OP) with only a Statement of Waiver of Sovereign Land as proof of mastery. The letter still can be used as verification tool, although not as strong as Certificate. In addition, the legal protection given to holders of IUP-OP therefore permits related to support its mining operations has been issued by the government that previously had been obtained through the correct procedures stipulated in the legislation. The Results of this research was prescriptive analytical because the authors wanted to explain and provide a solution or a way out for the holder of IUP-OP facing a lawsuit from the other party. Future existence of a good working relationship between the Central Government and Local Government was expected in establishing a new rule before coming into effect in order to avoid the problems that could be rised and harm the mining operation and the State;Mining is the business fields that are in demand by investors today. However, mining has a high risk level, require large capital and using modern technology, and there is still have obligations in the form of tax state revenue that must be met to the State. And having fulfilled the obligation to the State, there is another obligation that still need to be fulfilled by completing some or all of the rights in land acquisition in the Wilayah Izin Usaha Pertambangan (WIUP) for its business activities with the holders of land rights as defined in Article 135 of Law No. 4 of 2009 on Mineral and Coal. That Obligation becomes the peak of mining problem, because mining entrepreneurs who have completed all of its obligations and then want to apply for the right to land pursuant to Article 137 of Law No. 4 of 2009 on Mineral and Coal was delayed because of the designation of forest areas do not lead to a certainty between the Central Government and Local Government, which had caused resulting in the entire activity in the land office does not run properly because of the uncertainty where the area is allowed to be given Right for the Land and which one is not allowed. Therefore, land registration processing to obtain Certificates can not be met, then holders of Izin Usaha Pertambangan Operasi Produksi (IUP-OP) with only a Statement of Waiver of Sovereign Land as proof of mastery. The letter still can be used as verification tool, although not as strong as Certificate. In addition, the legal protection given to holders of IUP-OP therefore permits related to support its mining operations has been issued by the government that previously had been obtained through the correct procedures stipulated in the legislation. The Results of this research was prescriptive analytical because the authors wanted to explain and provide a solution or a way out for the holder of IUP-OP facing a lawsuit from the other party. Future existence of a good working relationship between the Central Government and Local Government was expected in establishing a new rule before coming into effect in order to avoid the problems that could be rised and harm the mining operation and the State., Mining is the business fields that are in demand by investors today. However, mining has a

high risk level, require large capital and using modern technology, and there is still have

obligations in the form of tax state revenue that must be met to the State. And having fulfilled

the obligation to the State, there is another obligation that still need to be fulfilled by

completing some or all of the rights in land acquisition in the Wilayah Izin Usaha

Pertambangan (WIUP) for its business activities with the holders of land rights as defined in

Article 135 of Law No. 4 of 2009 on Mineral and Coal. That Obligation becomes the peak of

mining problem, because mining entrepreneurs who have completed all of its obligations and

then want to apply for the right to land pursuant to Article 137 of Law No. 4 of 2009 on

Mineral and Coal was delayed because of the designation of forest areas do not lead to a

certainty between the Central Government and Local Government, which had caused

resulting in the entire activity in the land office does not run properly because of the

uncertainty where the area is allowed to be given Right for the Land and which one is not

allowed. Therefore, land registration processing to obtain Certificates can not be met, then

holders of Izin Usaha Pertambangan Operasi Produksi (IUP-OP) with only a Statement of

Waiver of Sovereign Land as proof of mastery. The letter still can be used as verification

tool, although not as strong as Certificate. In addition, the legal protection given to holders of

IUP-OP therefore permits related to support its mining operations has been issued by the

government that previously had been obtained through the correct procedures stipulated in

the legislation. The Results of this research was prescriptive analytical because the authors

wanted to explain and provide a solution or a way out for the holder of IUP-OP facing a

lawsuit from the other party. Future existence of a good working relationship between the

Central Government and Local Government was expected in establishing a new rule before

coming into effect in order to avoid the problems that could be rised and harm the mining

operation and the State]"

"Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum dengan kajian pelembagaan peradilan etik bagi penyelenggara negara di Indonesia. tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui urgensi dan model pembentukan peradilan etik bagi penyelenggara negara di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif.penelitian ini menyimpulkan pertama, bahwa kelembagaan etik saat ini masih bersifat beragam, parsial belum menjadi suatu lembaga khusus sebagaimana pengadilan untuk menegakkan etika bagi penyelenggara negara, Keberagaman dan sifat independensi kelembagaan penegakan etika penyelenggara negara justru merupakan masalah urgen yang harus dipecahkan dalam kerangka membangun sistem penegakan etika penyelenggara negara sebagai mekanisme baru untuk membangun integritas dan akuntabilitas penyelenggara negara yang kredibel dan terpadu. Kedua, perbandingan diberbagai negara demokrasi di dunia seperti Amerika Serikat, Inggris, Argentina dan Korea Selatan, bahwa perlu dibuat sebuah undang-undang tentang etika bagi penyelenggara negara sebagi payung hukum semua pejabat publik. Ketiga, terkait dengan model pembentukan peradilan etika perlu dilakukan proses integrasi etika materil dan formil dengan cara melakukan konsolidasi lembaga etik untuk membuat peraturan bersama sebagai etika materil, sementara untuk etika formil akan dibuat oleh Mahkamah etik dan selanjutnya menjadikan Komisi yudisial sebagai puncak peradilan etika. maka untuk menjadikan Komisi yudisial sebagi peradilan etika penelitian ini menyarankan harus dilakukan amandemen UUD 1945 dan menyarankan kepada pemerintah dan DPR untuk membuat undang-undang tentang etika penyelenggara negara.

---

This research is a legal research with a study of the institutionalization of ethical courts for state officials in Indonesia. The purpose of this study is to determine the urgency and model for the formation of ethical courts for state administrators in Indonesia. The method used in this research is normative legal research. This research concludes first, that ethical institutions are currently still diverse, partial has not yet become a special institution as a court to uphold ethics for state administrators, diversity and independence of institutional ethics enforcement of state administrators is an urgent problem that must be resolved within the framework of building a system of ethics enforcement for state administrators as a new mechanism for building integrity and accountability for credible and integrated state administrators. Second, a comparison in various democratic countries in the world, such as the United States, Britain, Argentina and South Korea, that it is necessary to make a law on ethics for state administrators as the legal umbrella for all public officials. Third, in relation to the model for the formation of an ethical court, it is necessary to carry out a process of integrating material and formal ethics by consolidating ethical institutions to make joint regulations as material ethics, while for formal ethics it will be made by the Ethics Court and then making the judicial Commission as the top of the ethics court. So, to make the judicial Commission as an ethics court, this research suggests amendments to the 1945 Constitution and suggests the government and the DPR to make laws on the ethics of state administrators."

"Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum dengan kajian pelembagaan peradilan etik bagi penyelenggara negara di Indonesia. tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui urgensi dan model pembentukan peradilan etik bagi penyelenggara negara di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif.penelitian ini menyimpulkan pertama, bahwa kelembagaan etik saat ini masih bersifat beragam, parsial belum menjadi suatu lembaga khusus sebagaimana pengadilan untuk menegakkan etika bagi penyelenggara negara, Keberagaman dan sifat independensi kelembagaan penegakan etika penyelenggara negara justru merupakan masalah urgen yang harus dipecahkan dalam kerangka membangun sistem penegakan etika penyelenggara negara sebagai mekanisme baru untuk membangun integritas dan akuntabilitas penyelenggara negara yang kredibel dan terpadu. Kedua, perbandingan diberbagai negara demokrasi di dunia seperti Amerika Serikat, Inggris, Argentina dan Korea Selatan, bahwa perlu dibuat sebuah undang-undang tentang etika bagi penyelenggara negara sebagi payung hukum semua pejabat publik. Ketiga, terkait dengan model pembentukan peradilan etika perlu dilakukan proses integrasi etika materil dan formil dengan cara melakukan konsolidasi lembaga etik untuk membuat peraturan bersama sebagai etika materil, sementara untuk etika formil akan dibuat oleh Mahkamah etik dan selanjutnya menjadikan Komisi yudisial sebagai puncak peradilan etika. maka untuk menjadikan Komisi yudisial sebagi peradilan etika penelitian ini menyarankan harus dilakukan amandemen UUD 1945 dan menyarankan kepada pemerintah dan DPR untuk membuat undang-undang tentang etika penyelenggara negara.

---

This research is a legal research with a study of the institutionalization of ethical courts for state officials in Indonesia. The purpose of this study is to determine the urgency and model for the formation of ethical courts for state administrators in Indonesia. The method used in this research is normative legal research. This research concludes first, that ethical institutions are currently still diverse, partial has not yet become a special institution as a court to uphold ethics for state administrators, diversity and independence of institutional ethics enforcement of state administrators is an urgent problem that must be resolved within the framework of building a system of ethics enforcement for state administrators as a new mechanism for building integrity and accountability for credible and integrated state administrators. Second, a comparison in various democratic countries in the world, such as the United States, Britain, Argentina and South Korea, that it is necessary to make a law on ethics for state administrators as the legal umbrella for all public officials. Third, in relation to the model for the formation of an ethical court, it is necessary to carry out a process of integrating material and formal ethics by consolidating ethical institutions to make joint regulations as material ethics, while for formal ethics it will be made by the Ethics Court and then making the judicial Commission as the top of the ethics court. So, to make the judicial Commission as an ethics court, this research suggests amendments to the 1945 Constitution and suggests the government and the DPR to make laws on the ethics of state administrators."

"Instansi ALT merupakan salah satu satuan kerja (satker) yang berada dibawah naungan Kementerian Sekretariat Negara (Kemensetneg) yang mempunyai tugas memberikan pelayanan prima kepada VVIP secara profesional, transparan dan akuntabel. Dalam penyelenggaraan kegiatan operasional, instansi ALT memanfaatkan peran teknologi informasi sebagai sarana pendukung pada lingkup internal maupun eksternal. Ketersediaan dan kehandalan layanan berbasiskan teknologi informasi merupakan hal yang sangat penting, sehingga perlu adanya perencanaan guna menjamin kesinambungan kegiatan bisnis yang diakibatkan oleh gangguan maupun bencana. Hal ini sesuai dengan tujuan strategis organisasi yang diperkuat oleh Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 82 Tahun 2012 tentang Penyelenggaraan Sistem dan Transaksi Elektronik pasal 17 ayat 1. Dikarenakan pentingnya hal tersebut, maka perlu dirancang rencana kesinambungan bisnis yang baik untuk instansi ALT.Proses perancangan Business Continuity Plan (BCP) yang dilakukan menggunakan kerangka acuan NIST SP 800-34 rev.1. Tahapan awal dalam perancangan BCP adalah melakukan identifikasi kebijakan, sistem informasi, perangkat keras maupun jaringan. Dilanjutkan dengan melakukan analisis dampak bisnis serta identifikasi dan penilaian risiko terhadap aset yang dimiliki oeleh instansi ALT. Kemudian menentukan strategis kesinambungan yang meliputi aspek pemulihan, evakuasi darurat maupun restorasi fungsi pada saat terjadi gangguan ataupun bencana. Pada akhirnya pembentukan manajemen krisis sebagai pelaksana proses kesinambungan bisnis. Hasil dari perancangan BCP ini diharapkan dapat membantu menjamin ketersediaan dan kehandalan layanan teknologi informasi yang ada pada instansi ALT ketika terjadi gangguan maupun bencana.

---

ALT agencies is one unit of work under auspices the Ministry of State Secretariat (Kemensetneg) which has the task of providing excellent services to VVIP in a professional, transparent, and accountable. In the implementation of operational activities, ALT agencies are utilize role of information technology as a means of supporting in the internal and external scope. The availability and reliability of information technology-based services is an important thing, so it is necessary for planning to ensure continuity of business activity caused by disruption or disaster. This thing is in line with the strategic objectives of the organization and reinforced by Government Regulation No.82 Year 2012 about a implementation of Electronic Transaction System section 17 verse (1). Considering its importance, it is necessary to have a good business continuity plan for ALT agencies.

The design process of the Business Continuity Plan (BCP) were performed using the NIST SP 800-34 rev.1 framework as a reference. Early stages in the design BCP is to identify policy, information systems, hardware and networks. Followed by conducting a business impact analysis and risk assessment as well as the identification of the assets owned by ALT agency. Then determine are strategic aspects of sustainability which includes recovery, emergency evacuation and restoration of function in the event of a disaster or disruption.Finally, the establishment of crisis management as the process of implementing a business continuity. Results from the BCP design is expected to help ensuring the availability and reliability of existing information technology services when an interrupt and disasters to ALT agencies."