Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
ABSTRACT
Dalam upaya melindungi hak atas informasi sebagai hak asasi manusia sekaligus mewujudkan pemerintahan yang baik, diperlukan suatu instrumen hukum bagi masyarakat yang menginginkan informasi dari badan-badan publik. Di Indonesia, hak atas informasi diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2008 tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik UU KIP . Salah satu informasi yang diamanatkan oleh undang-undang tersebut untuk dibuka ke publik adalah perjanjian-perjanjian yang dibuat oleh badan publik dengan pihak lain. Menjadi masalah ketika dalam perjanjian tersebut, badan publik terikat dengan klausula kerahasiaan yang melarang badan publik untuk mengungkapan seluruh informasi yang berkaitan dengan transaksi yang diperjanjikan, termasuk dokumen perjanjian itu sendiri. Beberapa isu yang muncul dalam sengketa informasi yang berkaitan dengan perjanjian badan publik dengan pihak lain adalah pemaknaan badan publik itu sendiri serta informasi-informasi yang dikecualikan untuk dibuka ke publik dalam undang-undang. Skripsi ini meneliti tentang kerangka hukum keterbukaan perjanjian badan publik dengan pihak lain serta bagaimana pelaksanaan kewajiban pengungkapan ini dilihat dari sengketa-sengketa informasi yang muncul. Penelitian dilakukan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif yaitu dengan melihat bahan hukum dan menganalisis putusan. Berdasarkan penelitian ini, diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa klausula kerahasiaan merupakan pengaturan keperdataan yang tunduk pada hukum publik dalam yurisdiksi perjanjian tersebut, termasuk kewajiban untuk mengungkapkan perjanjian dalam undang-undang. Jika dalam kenyataannya perjanjian tersebut mengandung informasi yang dikecualikan maka badan publik diperbolehkan untuk tidak menyampaikannya kepada publik. Selain itu, ditemukan pula bahwa pendefinisian badan publik dalam UU KIP tidak hanya mencakup badan-badan organik dalam pemerintahan namun juga badan privat lainnya. Namun, kewajiban membuka informasi bagi badan privat tersebut terbatas pada aktivitasnya yang berada dalam domain publik.

---

ABSTRACT
In an effort to protect the right to information as a human right while creating good governance, a legal instrument is needed for people who want information from public bodies. In Indonesia, the right to information is regulated in Law Number 14 of 2008 concerning Public Information Openness of the FOI Law. One of the information mandated by the law to be made public is agreements made by public bodies with other parties. Being a problem when in the agreement, the public body is bound by a confidentiality clause that prohibits the public body from disclosing all information relating to the promised transaction, including the agreement document itself. Some of the issues that arise in information disputes relating to agreements of public bodies with other parties are the meaning of the public body itself as well as information that is exempt from being disclosed to the public in law. This thesis examines the legal framework for the disclosure of agreements of public bodies with other parties and how the implementation of this disclosure obligation is seen from information disputes that arise. The study was conducted using the normative juridical method, namely by looking at legal materials and analyzing decisions. Based on this study, it was concluded that the confidentiality clause is a civil regulation subject to public law in the jurisdiction of the agreement, including the obligation to disclose the agreement in law. If in reality the agreement contains excluded information, then the public body is allowed not to submit it to the public. In addition, it was also found that defining public bodies in the FOI Law did not only include organic bodies in government but also other private bodies. However, the obligation to disclose information to a private body is limited to its activities in the public domain.

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Since the signature of Law 31/2004 about Fishery and its revision through Law 45/2009, Indonesia had established 10 (ten) Fishery Courts. The first five, embedded in the distric courts of North Jakarta, Medan, Pontianak, Bitung, and Tual, were established on 2007; two, embedded in the distric courts of Tanjung Pinang and Ranai, were established on 2010; and the other three, embedded in the distric courts of Ambon, Sorong, and Merauke, were established on 2014. Originally intended to speed up the proceeding of illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing; thes courts where instead considered taking too long to prosecute the perpetrators. As theresult, many illegal vessels were sunked without trial process. Quoting Susi Pudjiastuti Indonesia's current Maritime and Fisheries Minister it was done to cut the decision-making chain. One of the reasons behind this slow process is there are too many institutions involved in its criminal procedure. Therefore, this paper attempts to explain the regulatory framework of Indonesia fishery court including their procedural law and clarify the scope of authority possessed by each institution in charge of criminal procedure investigation, prosecution, and adjudication. Using secondary data (legal materials, books, dictionary, articles from legal journals, etc.), this paper will give light to the shortcomings of current fisherycourt and criminal procedure in Indonesia which can be used as evaluation materials for future revision.