Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Anestesia umum dengan intubasi endotrakeal menggunakan pipa endotrakeal sering digunakan untuk memberikan ventilasi tekanan positif dan mencegah aspirasi. Namun, penggunaan alat ini dapat menimbulkan komplikasi atau keluhan pasca bedah seperti nyeri tenggorok. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk membandingkan keefektifan profilaksis deksametason intravena dengan triamsinolon asetonid topikal dalam mengurangi nyeri tenggorok pasca bedah.Metode: Penelitian ini adalah uji klinis prospektif yang diacak dan tersamar ganda. Sebanyak 121 pasien yang dijadwalkan menjalani pembedahan dalam anestesia umum menggunakan pipa endotrakeal dimasukkan ke dalam dua kelompok secara acak; Grup A 61 orang dan grup B 60 orang. Sebelum induksi, pasien dalam grup A diberikan 10 mg deksametason intravena dan pasta plasebo dioleskan pada kaf pipa endotrakeal. Pasien dalam grup B diberikan 2 mL NaCl 0,9% dan pasta triamsinolon asetonid dioleskan pada kaf pipa endotrakeal. Skor nyeri tenggorok pasca bedah dievaluasi 3 kali; sesaat setelah pembedahan berakhir, 2 jam pasca bedah dan 24 jam pasca bedah. Insidens dan derajat nyeri tenggorok pasca bedah dicatat.Hasil: Tidak didapatkan perbedaan bermakna di kedua kelompok pada insidens nyeri tenggorok pasca bedah sesaat setelah pembedahan berakhir (27,9% pada kelompok A dan 18,3% pada kelompok B, p = 0,214). Derajat nyeri tenggorok pasca bedah tidak berbeda bermakna di antara kedua kelompok.Simpulan: Triamsinolon asetonid topikal memiliki keefektifan yang sama dengan profilaksis deksametason intravena dalam mengurangi insidens nyeri tenggorok pasca bedah.

---

Tracheal intubation for general anesthesia is often used to give positive-pressure ventilation and prevent aspiration during anesthesia. However, the use of this airway device can cause complications and complains about postoperative sore throat (POST). This study was undertaken to compare the effectiveness of prophylactic intravenous dexamethasone to triamcinolone acetonide paste in reducing POST. Methods : This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. A total of 121 patients scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia using endotracheal tube were randomly allocated into two groups; 61 (group A) and 60 (group B). Before induction, group A receives 10 mg of intravenous dexamethasone and placebo paste applied over the endotracheal tube cuff. Group B receives 2mL of intravenous normal saline and triamcinolone acetonide paste applied over the endotracheal tube cuff. POST scores were evaluated 3 times; immediately after the operation, 2-hours, and 24-hours after the operation. The incidence and severity of POST were recorded.Results: There were no significant differences in the incidence of POST immediately after the operation between the two groups (27,9 % in group A vs 18,3% in group B, p = 0,214).The severity scores of POST were not significantly different between the two groups.Conclusion: Topical triamcinolone acetonide was equally effective compared to prophylactic intravenous dexamethasone in reducing the incidence of POST."

"Latar Belakang ; Pelayanan medis di instalasi bedah sentral membutuhkan biaya yang besar dan melibatkan sumber daya manusia (SDM) dari berbagai bidang ilmu meliputi SDM medis maupun SDM non medis. Adanya keterlambatan akan mengakibatkan peningkatan biaya dan mempengaruhi keselamatan pasien.Metode : Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisa waktu pelayanan menggunakan metode metode kuantitatif dan kualitatif dengan desain retrospektif. Data kuantitatif didapatkan dari telaah dokumen dengan jumlah sampel 547 kasus operasi bedah saraf (358 kasus operasi kranial, 189 kasus operasi spinal), sedangkan data kualitatif didapatkan melalui wawancara mendalam dengan delapan informan penelitian. Analisis data dilakukan secara kuantitatif dengan uji Mann Whitney.Hasil : Didapatkan adanya keterlambatan dalam pelayanan ruang operasi bedah saraf operasi kranial 54 menit dan operasi spinal 48 menit. Didapatkan perbedaan waktu klinis, waktu non klinis dan waktu keterlambatan non klinis antara operasi kranial dan spinal. Keterlambatan dalam pelayanan ruang operasi disebabkan oleh faktor SDM, sarana prasarana dan kebijakan.Simpulan : Keterlambatan dalam pelayanan ruang operasi IBS RSPON terjadi dalam tahap proses anestesi, pemasangan monitoring saraf intraoperasi, positioning pasien, draping pasien, dan pembedahan. Keterlambatan dalam pelayanan ruang operasi IBS RSPON disebabkan oleh faktor SDM, sarana prasarana, dan kebijakan......Background : Medical services at a central surgical installation require a large amount of money and involve human resources (HR) from various fields of knowledge including medical and non-medical human resources. Delays in the operating room causes increased costs and impacts patient safety.Methods: This study aims to analyze the service time using quantitative and qualitative method with a retrospective design. Quantitative data was obtained from a document review with a sample of 547 cases of neurosurgery (358 cases of cranial surgery, 189 cases of spinal surgery), while qualitative data was obtained through in-depth interviews with eight research informants. Data analysis was carried out quantitatively with the Mann Whitney test.Result: Delays found in the neurosurgery operating room service for cranial surgery and spinal surgery was 54 minutes and 48 minutes respectively. There were differences in clinical time, non-clinical time, and non-clinical time delay between cranial and spinal surgery. Delays in the OR were caused by human resource factors, equipment, and hospital policies.Conclusion: Delays in RSPON IBS operating room services occur in the stages of the anesthesia process, installation of intraoperative nerve monitoring, patient positioning, patient draping, and surgery. Delays in RSPON IBS operating room services were caused by human resource factors, infrastructure, and policies"