Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Masalah kesehatan respirasi merupakan masalah kesehatan yang penting karena prevalensinya cukup tinggi di Indonesia. Menurut WHO, beberapa masalah kesehatan respirasi yang prevalensinya cukup tinggi di Indonesia adalah pneumonia, tuberkulosis, asma dan PPOK. Dalam penelitian ini, masalah kesehatan respirasi dikaitkan dengan kepuasan terhadap pelayanan kesehatan.Penelitian menggunakan desain cross sectional dan diadakan di Kelurahan Petamburan. Pengambilan data dilakukan sejak 21 Januari 2012 ? 26 Januari 2012 dengan melibatkan 109 responden yang dipilih dengan metode consecutive sampling. Pengambilan data dilakukan dengan metode wawancara menggunakan kuesioner yang telah divalidasi sebelumnya.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan prevalensi masalah kesehatan respirasi di lingkungan kumuh adalah 5,06%. Kepuasan terhadap pelayanan kesehatan tidak berhubungan dengan masalah kesehatan respirasi baik untuk kepuasan terhadap hubungan dokter-pasien (p=0,451), fasilitas pelayanan kesehatan (p=0,237) maupun sistem administrasi (p=0,219).

---

Respiratory disease is an important health problem due to its high prevalence in Indonesia. According to WHO, several respiratory diseases of which prevalence are high in Indonesia are pneumonia, tuberculosis, asthma, and COPD. The goal of this research is to find out the association between respiratory disease and the satisfaction toward health-service.

This research uses the cross sectional design. It was held in Petamburan from January 21st - January 26th in 2012 by involving 109 respondents, chosen by consecutive sampling method. The data was collected by interviewing all respondents with a quesioner that has been validated.

The result shows the prevalence of respiratory diseases in rural area is 5,06%. There's no association between satisfaction toward health-service and the existence of respiratory disease in rural area either satisfaction toward the relationship between doctor-patient (p=0,451), toward health-care facilities (p=0,237), or administration system (p=0,219)."

"Latar belakang: Rehospitalisasi 30 hari pada gagal jantung menyebabkan perburukan prognosis dan paling sering terjadi karena kongesti hemodinamik yang ditandai oleh tekanan pengisian ventrikel kiri (left ventricular end diastolic pressure/LVEDP) persisten tinggi. Oleh karena itu, dekongesti komplit harus dipastikan sebelum pasien pulang dari perawatan. Salah satu modalitas yang potensial adalah skor SAFE melalui evaluasi 3 komponen kongesti hemodinamik, yaitu: pompa (ejection fraction/EF), pipa (internal jugular vein collapsibility index/IJVCI dan inferior vena cava/IVC) dan jaringan interstisial (B-lines). Pada studi ini, rerata E/e’ ditambahkan pada skor SAFE dengan pertimbangan nilai prognostik rerata E/e’ dalam memprediksi kejadian rehospitalisasi.Tujuan: Membandingkan skor SAFE dan skor SAFE+rerata E/e’ dalam memprediksi rehospitalisasi 30 hari terkait gagal jantung akut.Metode: Dilakukan studi kohort prospektif dengan melibatkan 82 orang pasien gagal jantung akut yang dirawat di RSJPDHK. Analisis bivariat dan multivariat dilakukan untuk membandingkan kemampuan prediksi skor SAFE dan skor SAFE+rerata E/e’ terhadap rehospitalisasi 30 hari terkait gagal jantung akut.Hasil: Insidensi rehospitalisasi 30 hari terkait gagal jantung akut mencapai 19,5%. Kurva Kaplan-Meier menunjukkan rehospitalisasi lebih rendah pada kondisi euvolemia daripada hipervolemia (p 0,003). Skor SAFE+rerata E/e’ memiliki kemampuan prediksi rehospitalisasi 30 hari yang lebih baik daripada skor SAFE (AUC 0,77 [95% CI: 0,64 – 0,89] vs AUC 0,74 [95% CI: 0,62 – 0,85]).Kesimpulan: Skor SAFE+rerata E/e’ memiliki kemampuan prediksi rehospitalisasi 30 hari terkait gagal jantung akut yang lebih baik daripada skor SAFE.

---

Background: Short-term-rehospitalization worsens prognosis and frequently occurs due to persistently high LVEDP (hemodynamic congestion) among patients with heart failure (HF). Therefore, it is necessary to ascertain complete decongestion prior to hospital discharge. SAFE score is a potential scoring system to do so because it measures 3 main components of hemodynamic congestion: pump (EF), pipe (IJVCI and IVC) and interstitial tissue (B-lines). In this study, average E/e’ is added to SAFE score considering its clinically significant prognostic value in predicting risk of rehospitalization among patients with HF.

Aim: To compare SAFE score and SAFE score+average E/e’ in predicting 30-day-acute HF (AHF)- related-rehospitalization.

Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted by involving 82 patients admitted with AHF in National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita (NCCHK). Bivariate and multivariate analysis were done to find out which of the 2 models: SAFE score and SAFE score+average E/e’ could better predict risk of 30-day-AHF-related-rehospitalization.

Results: The incidence of 30-day-AHF-related-rehospitalization in this study was 19,5%. By using Kaplan-Meier curve, we identified significantly lower 30-day-AHF-related-rehospitalization in patients discharged with euvolemia than those with hypervolemia (p 0,003). SAFE score+average E/e’ had better predictive properties than SAFE score regarding 30-day-AHF-related-rehospitalization (AUC 0,77 [95% CI: 0,64 – 0,89] vs AUC 0,74 [95% CI: 0,62 – 0,85]).

Conclusion: SAFE score+average E/e’ had better predictive properties than SAFE score regarding 30- day-AHF-related-rehospitalization."

"Latar belakang: Rehospitalisasi 30 hari pada gagal jantung menyebabkan perburukan prognosis dan paling sering terjadi karena kongesti hemodinamik yang ditandai oleh tekanan pengisian ventrikel kiri (left ventricular end diastolic pressure/LVEDP) persisten tinggi. Oleh karena itu, dekongesti komplit harus dipastikan sebelum pasien pulang dari perawatan. Salah satu modalitas yang potensial adalah skor SAFE melalui evaluasi 3 komponen kongesti hemodinamik, yaitu: pompa (ejection fraction/EF), pipa (internal jugular vein collapsibility index/IJVCI dan inferior vena cava/IVC) dan jaringan interstisial (B-lines). Pada studi ini, rerata E/e’ ditambahkan pada skor SAFE dengan pertimbangan nilai prognostik rerata E/e’ dalam memprediksi kejadian rehospitalisasi.Tujuan: Membandingkan skor SAFE dan skor SAFE+rerata E/e’ dalam memprediksi rehospitalisasi 30 hari terkait gagal jantung akut.Metode: Dilakukan studi kohort prospektif dengan melibatkan 82 orang pasien gagal jantung akut yang dirawat di RSJPDHK. Analisis bivariat dan multivariat dilakukan untuk membandingkan kemampuan prediksi skor SAFE dan skor SAFE+rerata E/e’ terhadap rehospitalisasi 30 hari terkait gagal jantung akut.Hasil: Insidensi rehospitalisasi 30 hari terkait gagal jantung akut mencapai 19,5%. Kurva Kaplan-Meier menunjukkan rehospitalisasi lebih rendah pada kondisi euvolemia daripada hipervolemia (p 0,003). Skor SAFE+rerata E/e’ memiliki kemampuan prediksi rehospitalisasi 30 hari yang lebih baik daripada skor SAFE (AUC 0,77 [95% CI: 0,64 – 0,89] vs AUC 0,74 [95% CI: 0,62 – 0,85]).Kesimpulan: Skor SAFE+rerata E/e’ memiliki kemampuan prediksi rehospitalisasi 30 hari terkait gagal jantung akut yang lebih baik daripada skor SAFE.

---

Background: Short-term-rehospitalization worsens prognosis and frequently occurs due to persistently high LVEDP (hemodynamic congestion) among patients with heart failure (HF). Therefore, it is necessary to ascertain complete decongestion prior to hospital discharge. SAFE score is a potential scoring system to do so because it measures 3 main components of hemodynamic congestion: pump (EF), pipe (IJVCI and IVC) and interstitial tissue (B-lines). In this study, average E/e’ is added to SAFE score considering its clinically significant prognostic value in predicting risk of rehospitalization among patients with HF.

Aim: To compare SAFE score and SAFE score+average E/e’ in predicting 30-day-acute HF (AHF)- related-rehospitalization.

Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted by involving 82 patients admitted with AHF in National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita (NCCHK). Bivariate and multivariate analysis were done to find out which of the 2 models: SAFE score and SAFE score+average E/e’ could better predict risk of 30-day-AHF-related-rehospitalization.

Results: The incidence of 30-day-AHF-related-rehospitalization in this study was 19,5%. By using Kaplan-Meier curve, we identified significantly lower 30-day-AHF-related-rehospitalization in patients discharged with euvolemia than those with hypervolemia (p 0,003). SAFE score+average E/e’ had better predictive properties than SAFE score regarding 30-day-AHF-related-rehospitalization (AUC 0,77 [95% CI: 0,64 – 0,89] vs AUC 0,74 [95% CI: 0,62 – 0,85]).

Conclusion: SAFE score+average E/e’ had better predictive properties than SAFE score regarding 30- day-AHF-related-rehospitalization."