Search Result  ::  Save as CSV :: Back

"Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menilai perbedaan latihan jentera dan sepeda statis terhadap perubahan kapasitas fungsional dan kualitas hidup pada penderita Penyakit Paru Obstruktif Kronik (PPOK) kondisi stabil.Metode: Metode penelitian eksperimental dengan jumlah sampel 44 orang, terdiri dari 22 orang dengan latihan sepeda statis dan 22 orang dengan latihan jentera yang datang ke poli Rehabilitasi Medik RS Persahabatan. Penilaian kapasitas fungsional menggunakan metode Uji Jalan 6 Menit (UJ6M) dilakukan minggu I, V dan IX. Penilaian kualitas hidup diukur menggunakan St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) dilakukan minggu I dan IX. Program latihan dilakukan selama 8 minggu.Hasil: Latihan jentera dan sepeda statis menghasilkan perbaikan signifikan baik dalam hal hasil uji jalan 6 menit dan SGRQ sejak minggu I sampai IX. Namun dalam perbandingan latihan yang memberikan hasil terbaik, jentera meningkatkan jarak tempuh jalan 6 menit lebih baik dibandingkan sepeda statis secara konsisten pada minggu I–V, V-IX dan I-IX (p <0,001). Untuk nilai SGRQ, hasil kedua latihan tidak berbeda signifikan.Kesimpulan: Kelompok latihan jentera memiliki peningkatan kapasitas fungsional yang lebih besar dan berbeda bermakna dibandingkan kelompok latihan sepeda statis pada subjek PPOK stabil. Kelompok latihan jentera memiliki peningkatan kualitas hidup yang tidak berbeda bermakna dibandingkan kelompok latihan sepeda statis pada subjek PPOK stabil.

---

Objective: This study aimed to assess the differences between treadmill and ergocycle exercise on changes in functional capacity and quality of life in patients with stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).

Methods: This is an experimental research with a sample of 44 subjects, consisting of 22 subjects in the ergocycle exercise group and 22 subjects in the treadmill exercise group, at Persahabatan Hospital Medical Rehabilitation Clinic. Assessment of functional capacity using the 6 Minute Walking Test (6MWT) was performed on weeks I, V and IX. Assessment of quality of life was measured using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) performed on the week I and IX. Training program was conducted for 8 weeks.

Results: Treadmill and ergocycle exercise produce significant improvement in both the 6MWT results and SGRQ since week I to IX. But in comparison, treadmill exercise improves 6MWT distance better than ergocycle consistently at week I-V, V-IX and I-IX (p <0.001). For the SGRQ score, both exercises did not differ significantly.

Conclusion: The treadmill exercise group had a larger and significantly different improvement in functional capacity than the ergocycle exercise group in stable COPD subjects. Treadmill exercise group improvements on quality of life was not significantly different than the ergocycle exercise group in stable COPD subjects."

"Latar Belakang: Rumah Sakit berfungsi melakukan upaya kesehatan dasar, kesehatan rujukanserta kesehatan penunjang yang dituntut mampu meningkatkan kualitas sumber daya manusia,peralatan dan teknologi. Analisis biaya dalam hal ini, dapat digunakan untuk perhitunganperencanaan anggaran, pengendalian biaya serta subsidi. Tujuan: Untuk mengetahui biayasatuan tindakan Rehabilitasi Medik serta upaya efisiensi dalam menutup kesenjangan tarifRumah Sakit dengan tarif INA CBGs. Metode: Analisis biaya dilakukan pada 23776 tindakanantara lain: High Laser 5666, Dry Needling 708, Injeksi Intraartikular 3142, MWD 6313, TENS3845, US 185, Traksi 34, Parrafin 362, Inhalasi 137, berbagai jenis latihan (Fisioterapi Dewasa 147, Fisioterapi Anak 516, Terapi Wicara Dewasa 398, Terapi Wicara Anak 1477, OkupasiTerapi Dewasa 709, Okupasi Terapi Anak 137). Hasil: Total biaya tindakan sebesar Rp13.122.053.719,-. Kesenjangan paket biaya satuan dengan tarif INA CBGs untuk paket 2modalitas (TENS-MWD) sebesar Rp (337.339), paket Latihan Fisioterapi Anak sebesar Rp(344.196), paket modalitas dan latihan (TENS – OT dewasa) sebesar Rp (536.293), paket HighLaser sebesar Rp (554.803), paket Injeksi Intraartikular sebesar Rp (889.211). Kesimpulan:Adanya kesenjangan biaya satuan dengan tarif Rumah Sakit serta tarif INA CBG’s dapatmenjadi bahan evaluasi bagi Rumah Sakit untuk melakukan efisiensi.

---

Background: The function of the hospital is to carry out basic health efforts, referral health andsupporting health which are required to be able to improve the quality of human resources,equipment and technology. Cost analysis in this case can be used to calculate budget planning,cost control and subsidies. Objective: To determine unit costs for Medical Rehabilitation andefficiency efforts in closing the gap of hospital rates and INA CBGs rates. Methods: Costanalysis was performed on 23776 procedures including: High Laser 5666, Dry Needling 708,Intraarticular Injection 3142, MWD 6313, TENS 3845, US 185, Traction 34, Paraffin 362,Inhalation 137, various types of exercise (Adult Physiotherapy 147, Children Physiotherapy516, Adult Speech Therapy 398, Children Speech Therapy 1477, Adult Occupational Therapy709, Children Occupational Therapy 137). Result: The total cost is IDR 13,122,053,719.-. Thedifference between the unit cost package and the INA-CBGs rate for the 2 modality package(TENS-MWD) is IDR (337,339), the Children's Physiotherapy Training package is IDR(344.196), High Laser for IDR (554,803), Intraarticular Injection package for IDR (889,211).Conclusion: There is a gap in the unit cost with Hospital rates and INA-CBG's rates can beused as evaluation material for Hospitals to carry out efficiency."