Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Penelitian ini membahas mengenai persepsi risiko bahaya kimia pada pekerja sektor informal tahun 2014. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif dengan menggunakan metode penelitian kuantitatif yang menggunakan kuesioner ceklis untuk menilai variabel-variabel independen. Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk melihat gambaran persepsi terhadap risiko bahaya kimia beserta gambaran faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan persepsi risiko bahaya kimia, diantaranya pengalaman, kesukarelaan, ketakutan, pengendalian, potensi dampak, dan kondisi lingkungan kerja. Penelitian ini juga dilakukan untuk melihat gambaran perbandingan persepsi pekerja terhadap risiko bahaya kimia di kedua tempat industri informal yaitu industri penyamakan kulit dan industri sablon. Hasil penelitian menggambarkan bahwa secara umum persepsi risiko bahaya kimia pada pekerja sektor informal sudah baik, walaupun masih ada beberapa pekerja yang memiliki persepsi yang buruk terhadap risiko bahaya kimia. Berdasarkan lokasi kerja, persepsi risiko bahaya kimia pada pekerja sablon lebih baik dibandingkan dengan pekerja penyamakan kulit. Persepsi yang baik pada pekerja dikedua tempat ini didapatkan karena : pekerja sudah memiliki pengalaman yang baik terkait kejadian risiko bahaya kimia, sukarela menerima risiko bahaya kimia, memiliki ketakutan terhadap risiko bahaya kimia, pekerja merasa mampu mengendalikan risiko bahaya kimia, menilai risiko bahaya kimia sebagai risiko yang berpotensi katastropik, dan menilai lingkungan kerja sudah aman dari risiko bahaya kimia. ...... This research describes risk perception of chemical hazard on the informal sector worker 2014. This is a descriptive study that uses quantitative research methods with quesionnaire checklist as research instrument. Quesionnaire checklist used to assess the independent variabels. The purpose of this study is to see the overview of risk perception of chemical hazard and factors related to perception, such as experience, voluntary, dread, control, effect, and work environment. This study also looked at differences in workers perception between leather industry and shirt screen printing industry. The result of this study show that generally risk perception of chemical hazard on informal sector is good, although there are some workers who still have bad risk perception of chemical hazard. Based on the work location, the risk perception of chemical hazard to shirt screen printing worker is better than leather worker. Workers’ good perception can be achieve because they have good experience about chemical hazard, voluntarily accept the risks of chemical hazard, they are afraid of the risk of chemical hazard, workers assume that they can control the risk of chemical hazard, they assume the risk of chemical hazard as a result of catastropic, and they also assume that their working environment was safe from the risk of chemical hazard.

Abstrak :
Methods in Chemical Process Safety, Volume Two, the latest release in a serial that publishes fully commissioned methods papers across the field of process safety, risk assessment, and management and loss prevention, aims to provide informative, visual and current content that appeals to both researchers and practitioners in process safety. This new release contains unique chapters on offshore safety, offshore platform safety, human factors in offshore operation, marine safety, safety during well drilling and operation, safety during processing (top side), safety during transportation of natural resources (offshore pipeline), and regulatory contextHelps acquaint the reader/researcher with the fundamentals of process safetyProvides the most recent advancements and contributions on the topic from a practical point-of-viewPresents users with the views/opinions of experts in each topicIncludes a selection of the author(s) of each chapter from among the leading researchers and/or practitioners for each given topic

Abstrak :
Lees' process safety essentials is a single-volume digest presenting the critical, practical content from Lees' loss prevention for day-to-day use and reference. It is portable, authoritative, affordable, and accessible, ideal for those on the move, students, and individuals without access to the full three volumes of Lees'. This book provides a convenient summary of the main content of Lees', primarily drawn from the hazard identification, assessment, and control content of volumes one and two. Users can access essentials for day-to-day reference on topics including plant location and layout; human factors and human error, fire, explosion and toxic release, engineering for sustainable development, and much more.