Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Perilaku disruptif seperti berteriak-teriak, berperilaku agresif, kasar, melawan, dan merajuk merupakan perilaku-perilaku yang sering tampak pada anak yang mengalami ketidakmampuan intelektual (ID). Kemunculan perilaku disruptif ini semakin diperkuat oleh adanya faktor lingkungan, salah satunya adalah pola asuh yang mencakup interaksi antara anak dengan orangtua dan penerapan disiplin yang efektif terhadap anak. Perilaku disruptif memiliki efek buruk yang signifikan pada kondisi kesejahteraan hidup individu itu sendiri maupun orang lain. Apabila tidak segera ditangani, perilaku ini dapat berkembang menjadi semakin sulit ditangani, terutama pada masa remaja. Oleh karena itu, perilaku ini sebaiknya segera ditangani sejak usia dini. Menurut beberapa penelitian yang telah dilakukan untuk mengatasi perilaku disruptif, penerapan intervensi Parent Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) dinilai efektif untuk menurunkan perilaku disruptif pada anak, meskipun penelitian yang berfokus pada anak dengan ketidakmampuan intelektual jumlahnya masih terbatas. Pada penelitian ini, prinsip-prinsip Parent Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) digunakan untuk mengurangi perilaku disruptif pada anak dengan ketidakmampuan intelektual taraf sedang. Melalui pengukuran yang dilakukan menggunakan instrumen The Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI) dan Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS), diperoleh hasil penelitian yang menunjukkan bahwa penerapan PCIT berhasil menurunkan perilaku disruptif pada anak dengan ketidakmampuan intelektual taraf sedang.

---

Disruptive behavior such as yelling, aggressive behavior, rough behavior, fighting, and sulking are behaviors that are commonly seen in children with intellectual disability (ID). The emergence of these behavior reinforced by the presence of environmental factors, such as parenting style that includes the interaction between children and parents and the implementation of effective discipline towards children. Disruptive behavior have a significant effect to the condition of individuals wellbeing. If this condition leave not treated, these behaviors might be worse and difficult to handle, especially in adolescence. Therefore, this behavior should be treated at an early age. According to some studies that have been done to address disruptive behavior, the implementation of Parent Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) is considered effective to reduce disruptive behavior in children, although number of research which focuses on children with intellectual disability are limited. In this study, Parent Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) is used to reduce disruptive behavior in children with moderate intellectual disability. Through measurements using The Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI) and Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS), the results shows that the application of PCIT managed to reduce disruptive behavior in children with moderate intellectual disability."

"ABSTRAKKeberadaan Ruang Terbuka Hijau (RTH) dapat berfungsi sebagai tempat bermaindan berinteraksi bagi anak-anak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisishubungan perkembangan perilaku anak umur 6-12 tahun dengan keberadaanfungsi RTH. Penelitian ini menggunakan studi cross-sectional dan 216 sampel.Data yang didapatkan berupa data primer melalui wawancara menggunakankuesioner mengenai RTH dan Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)mengenai perkembangan perilaku anak. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan hanyautilitas RTH dengan perkembangan perilaku anak yang memiliki hubunganbermakna secara statistik. Nilai OR yang dihasilkan adalah 3,25 (CI 95%: 1,51-6,98) dan nilai p sebesar 0,03. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini bahwa hanyavariabel utilitas RTH yang memiliki hubungan signifikan dengan perkembanganperilaku anak.

---

ABSTRACTThe existence of green open space has function as a place to play andinteract with the children. This study aimed to analyze the relationship betweenbehavioral development of children aged 6-12 years with the presence of greenopen space function. This study uses a cross-sectional study and 216 samples.Data obtained in the form of primary data through interviews using aquestionnaire about RTH and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)on the development of children's behavior. The results showed only green openspace utility with behavioral development of children who have a statisticallysignificant relationship. OR the resulting value was 3.25 (95% CI: 1.51 to 6.98)and the p-value of 0.03. The conclusion from this study that the only variablegreen open space utility that has a significant relationship with the developmentof the child's behavior."

"[This unique volume addresses basic questions in salient detail, from types and rates of challenging behaviors to populations that warrant functional assessment. In addition, it examines typical assessment techniques, including interview, scaling, experimental, and in vivo methods. The use of functional assessment in treatment planning, and in combination with other interventions, is covered in depth. An especially timely chapter identifies key ethical and legal concerns in working with challenging behavior populations. Coverage includes : the history of behavior analysis and functional assessment. The nature, prevalence, and characteristics of challenging behaviors. Interview and observation methods in functional assessment and analysis. Experimental functional analysis for challenging behaviors. Treatment methods commonly used with functional assessment. Using functional assessment in treatment planning., This unique volume addresses basic questions in salient detail, from types and rates of challenging behaviors to populations that warrant functional assessment. In addition, it examines typical assessment techniques, including interview, scaling, experimental, and in vivo methods. The use of functional assessment in treatment planning, and in combination with other interventions, is covered in depth. An especially timely chapter identifies key ethical and legal concerns in working with challenging behavior populations. Coverage includes : the history of behavior analysis and functional assessment. The nature, prevalence, and characteristics of challenging behaviors. Interview and observation methods in functional assessment and analysis. Experimental functional analysis for challenging behaviors. Treatment methods commonly used with functional assessment. Using functional assessment in treatment planning.]"