Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Pemegang saham minoritas sering kali menjadi pihak yang dirugikan dalam transaksi yang mengandung benturan kepentingan. Bapepam telah mengeluarkan Peraturan Nomor IX.E.1 tentang Benturan Kepentingan sebagai suatu bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi para pemegang saham minoritas. Pokok permasalahan yang dibahas di dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimanakah pengaturan mengenai proses penawaran umum terbatas dengan HMETD yang dilakukan dalam rangka konversi utang menjadi saham, perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang saham minoritas dalam transaksi yang mengandung benturan kepentingan, dan prosedur RUPS Independen yang dilakukan oleh PT Central Proteinaprima Tbk. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan desain deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa PT Central Proteinprima Tbk dalam proses RUPS Independen telah terbukti melanggar ketentuan yang berlaku mengenai benturan kepentingan dan tidak sesuai dengan prinsip Good Corporate Governance. Kesimpulan yang didapat adalah pengaturan mengenai HMETD terdapat dalam Pasal 82 ayat (1) dan (2) Undang-Undang Tentang Pasal Modal, Peraturan Bapepam Nomor IX.D.1, IX.D.2, IX.D.3 dan IX.D.4; perlindungan hukum dalam transaksi benturan kepentingan terdapat dalam Undang-Undang Tentang Perseroan Terbatas, Undang-Undang Pasar Modal, dan Peraturan Bapepam Nomor IX.E.1 dan melalui penerapan prinsip Good Corporate Governance oleh perusahaan pelanggaran yang dilakukan oleh PT Central Proteinaprima Tbk, mengakibatkan RUPS Independen tidak sah, namun penawaran umum terbatas yang telah dilaksanakan tetap berlaku.

---

Minority shareholders are regularly disadvantaged in the transaction containing conflict of interest. Bapepam has enacted Rule Number IX.E.1 regarding Conflict of Interest as a form of legal protection to the minority shareholders. Main issues discussed in this research are how the regulation rules on the process of limited public Offering conducted with the Rights Issue in order to debt to equity swap transaction, legal protection to the minority shareholders in a transaction that contains a conflict of interest, and procedures performed by the Independent Shareholders of PT Central ProteinaprimaTbk.

This thesis is using the method of normative juridical research on its research and is a qualitative descriptive research. The research found that PT Central Proteinprima Tbk, during the process of Independent General Meeting of Shareholders, has been proven to violate the applicable provisions regarding conflicts of interest and not in accordance with the principles of Good Corporate Governance.

The conclusion is the regulation of rights issues contained in Article 82 paragraph (1) and (2) Capital Market Law, Bapepam Rule Number IX.D.1, IX.D.2, IX.D.3 and IX.D .4; legal protection on the conflict of interest transactions contained in the Law On Limited Liability Company, Capital Market Law and Bapepam Rule Number IX.E.1 and through the application of principles of good corporate governance by the company; violations committed by PT Central Proteinaprima Corporation, giving a result that the Independent General Meeting of Shareholders is not lawful, but limited public offerings which have been executed still remain valid."

"[ABSTRAKPSAK mengatur mengenai tata cara pengakuan dan pencatatan akuntansi di Indonesia. Setiap praktik akuntansi yang dilakukan oleh perusahaan, pada akhirnya, harus dicatat sesuai dengan peraturan PSAK yang berlaku. Auditor bertugas membantu, menyusun, dan mengawasi praktik akuntansi perusahaan agar benar sebagaimana mestinya. Studi ini membahas praktik akuntansi yang terjadi di PT A terkait kegiatan investasi PT A. Praktik kegiatan akuntansi salah satu akun investasi PT A ini akan membahas juga beberapa aspek lain terkait dengan kajian utama diantaranya transaksi pertukaran aset nonmoneter yang muncul terkait kegiatan investasi serta konflik kepentingan yang terjadi diantara manajemen, komite audit dan auditor eksternal.

---

ABSTRACTPSAK regulates the procedures for recognition of accounting records in Indonesia. Each accounting practices conducted by the company, in the end, must be recorded in accordance with PSAK applicable regulations. Auditor help company to prepare and oversee the company's accounting practices in order to correct as it should be. The case study discusses the accounting practices that occur in PT A-related investment activities of one PT A. Practice false accounting activities or investment account of PT A of this study will be with several other issues including non-monetary asset exchange transaction arising out of investment activities as well as potential conflicts of interest between management, the audit committee and external auditors. , PSAK regulates the procedures for recognition of accounting records in Indonesia. Each accounting practices conducted by the company, in the end, must be recorded in accordance with PSAK applicable regulations. Auditor help company to prepare and oversee the company's accounting practices in order to correct as it should be. The case study discusses the accounting practices that occur in PT A-related investment activities of one PT A. Practice false accounting activities or investment account of PT A of this study will be with several other issues including non-monetary asset exchange transaction arising out of investment activities as well as potential conflicts of interest between management, the audit committee and external auditors. ]"