Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menganalisis faktor penentu pemilihan perlengkapan keselamatan bersepeda (safety equipment), menganalisis prioritas pemilihan perlengkapan keselamatan bersepeda (safety equipment) saat bersepeda di jalan raya, dan mengevaluasi faktor pengaruh perilaku (behavior) menyimpang pengendara sepeda terhadap tingkat keselamatan bersepeda di jalan raya. Pengambilan data dilakukan menggunakan kuesioner dengan dua metode, yaitu cycling experiment dan menggunakan Bicycle Rider Behavior Questionnaire (BRBQ). Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, prioritas pemilihan penggunaan perlengkapan keselamatan bersepeda (safety equipment) adalah Lampu Sepeda, Helm, Pakaian Reflektif, Sepatu, dan Sarung Tangan. Faktor penentu pemilihan perlengkapan keselamatan bersepeda yang utama adalah Compliance (Kesesuaian dengan standar keamanan), Protection (Keamanan), dan Comfort (Kenyamanan). Selain itu, Terdapat sembilan pengelompokkan dimensi baru pada BRBQ, yaitu Notice Failures, Cycling Aggressive Action, Intention of Violation, Stunts, Distractions, Signaling Violation, Cycling Rage, Infrastructural Problem, dan Action of Violation. ......This study was conducted to analyze the determining factors in the selection of cycling safety equipment, assess the prioritization of cycling safety equipment when cycling on the road, and evaluate the influence of cyclist’s behavior on the level of cycling safety on the road. Data collection was carried out using a questionnaire with two methods, cycling experiment and the Bicycle Rider Behavior Questionnaire (BRBQ). Based on the research findings, the prioritization of cycling safety equipment usage are Bicycle Lights, Helmets, Reflective Clothing, Shoes, and Gloves. The main determining factors in the selection of cycling safety equipment are Compliance, Protection, and Comfort. Additionally, there are nine new dimensions in the BRBQ, namely Notice Failures, Cycling Aggressive Action, Intention of Violation, Stunts, Distractions, Signaling Violation, Cycling Rage, Infrastructural Problem, and Action of Violation.
Berdasarkan pengamatan ITDP pada Juni 2020, jumlah pengendara sepeda meningkat hingga 10 kali lipat dibandingkan Oktober 2019. Peningkatan jumlah pengendara sepeda sejalan dengan peningkatan jumlah kecelakaan sepeda berdasarkan data dari Polda Metro Jaya dan komunitas Bike to Work. Pengendara sepeda memiliki risiko 55% lebih tinggi terlibat dalam kecelakaan pada malam hari dibandingkan siang hari. Lampu berkedip dapat meningkatkan conspicuity pengendara sepeda dan menjadi solusi untuk masalah keterlihatan pengendara sepeda yang merupakan penyebab utama kecelakaan. Penelitian ini bertujan untuk mengetahui pengaruh pola kedipan lampu sepeda terhadap conspicuity pengendara sepeda dan mengevaluasi faktor kognitif pengemudi terhadap pola kedipan lampu sepeda. Penelitian ini melibatkan 12 responden (6 laki-laki dan 6 perempuan) untuk membandingkan conspicuity pengendara sepeda yang dihasilkan dari setiap pola kedipan. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa pattern full blink lebih meningkatkan conspicuity pengendara sepeda dengan jarak deteksi sejauh 80,25 meter, dibandingkan pattern partial blink dengan jarak deteksi sejauh 76,09 meter. Selain itu, kondisi pedal sepeda yang berkaitan dengan adanya biological motion dan jarak deteksi yang lebih jauh memberikan indikasi mengenai proses kognitif responden dalam mengenali pesepeda. ......Based on ITDP's observation in June 2020, the number of cyclists increased up to 10 times compared to October 2019. The increase in the number of cyclists is in line with the increase in the number of bicycle accidents, based on data from Polda Metro Jaya and the Bike to Work community. Cyclists have a 55% higher risk of being involved in an accident at night than during the day. Flashing lights can increase the conspicuity of cyclists and provide a solution to the problem of cyclist visibility, which is a major cause of accidents. This study aimed to determine the effect of bicycle light flashing patterns on cyclist conspicuity and to evaluate driver cognitive factors in relation to bicycle light flashing patterns. The study involved 12 respondents (6 males and 6 females) to compare the cyclist conspicuity resulting from each blink pattern. The results showed that the full blink pattern increased cyclists’ conspicuity more, with a detection distance of 80.25 meters, compared to the partial blink pattern with a detection distance of 76.09 meters. In addition, the condition of the bicycle pedals associated with biological motion and longer detection distances provides an indication of the respondents' cognitive process in recognizing cyclists.
