Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
[Pemberian kuasa merupakan langkah hukum yang dibenarkan oleh Undang-Undang. Pemberi Kuasa atau Prinsipal dapat memberikan kuasa kepada pihak yang menurutnya bisa mewakili kepentingan hukumnya. Berdasarkan Pasal 1338 KUHPerdata mengenai prinsip kebebasan berkontrak, kuasa tersebut dapat diberikan dengan kuasa yang tidak dapat ditarik kembali. Akan tetapi Pasal 1338 KUHPerdata tersebut telahdiberi batasan dengan Pasal 1337 KUHPerdata yang menyatakan bahwa suatu sebab adalah terlarang, jika sebab itu dilarang oleh undang-undang dan Pasal 85 ayat 5 UUPT menyatakan bahwa dalam hal pemegang saham hadir sendiri dalam RUPS, surat kuasa yang telah diberikan tidak berlaku untuk rapat tersebut. Pada penulisan tesis ini, penulis menggunakan bentuk penelitian normatif, dengan tipe penelitian deskriptif analistis, dan jenis data yang digunakan data sekunder. Dijelaskan dalam pokok permasalahanmengenai kuasa yang tidak dapat ditarik kembali dalam meghadiri dan memberikan suara pada Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham dilihat dari peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku dan pandangan pengadilan pada tiap-tiap putusannya.Penelitian dilakukan terhadap putusan Pengadilan, mulai dari Pengadilan Negeri, Pengadilan Tinggi, dan Mahkamah Agung terhadap Sengketa Antara Para Pemegang Saham PT. Cipta Televisi Pendidikan Indonesia melawan PT. Berkah Karya Bersama. Ditemukan jawaban bahwa kuasa yang tidak dapat ditarik kembali tersebut tetap dapat dicabut berdasarkan Pasal 1337 KUHPerdata dan Pasal 85 ayat 5 UUPT;The power of attorney as a legal step allowed by regulation, principal has been given power of attorney to a party as represent in person for legal interest. Based on article 1338 Indonesian Civil Code Authorization on principle freedom of contract, The Power of Attorney can be form of hereby confers an irrevocable power of attorney. But article 1338Indonesian Civil Code has been restricted with article 1337 Indonesian Civil Code a cause is not permissible if it is prohibited by law, or if it violates good conduct, or public orderand article 85 paragraph 5 concerning Limited Liability Companies in the event that shareholders are present at the GMS in person, any power of attorney they have given shall not be valid for that meeting.In this Thesis in writer adopt a juridical normative and descriptive analyst method or research and relies on secondary data sources. For research matter this researchwill be explain the irrevocable power of attorney to attend and give a vote to General Meeting of Shareholders has been seen form all of regulations and the courts view from each decisions. Research conducted on the decision by judge, starting from the Court, High Court, and The Supreme Court to dispute between shareholders PT. Cipta Televisi Pendidikan Indonesia versus PT. Berkah Karya Bersama. Already found the answer irrevocable power of attorney still be revoked based on article 1337 Indonesian Civil Code and article 85 paragraph 5 concerning Limited Liability Companies.;The power of attorney as a legal step allowed by regulation, principal has been given power of attorney to a party as represent in person for legal interest. Based on article 1338 Indonesian Civil Code Authorization on principle freedom of contract, The Power of Attorney can be form of hereby confers an irrevocable power of attorney. But article 1338Indonesian Civil Code has been restricted with article 1337 Indonesian Civil Code a cause is not permissible if it is prohibited by law, or if it violates good conduct, or public orderand article 85 paragraph 5 concerning Limited Liability Companies in the event that shareholders are present at the GMS in person, any power of attorney they have given shall not be valid for that meeting.In this Thesis in writer adopt a juridical normative and descriptive analyst method or research and relies on secondary data sources. For research matter this researchwill be explain the irrevocable power of attorney to attend and give a vote to General Meeting of Shareholders has been seen form all of regulations and the courts view from each decisions. Research conducted on the decision by judge, starting from the Court, High Court, and The Supreme Court to dispute between shareholders PT. Cipta Televisi Pendidikan Indonesia versus PT. Berkah Karya Bersama. Already found the answer irrevocable power of attorney still be revoked based on article 1337 Indonesian Civil Code and article 85 paragraph 5 concerning Limited Liability Companies.;The power of attorney as a legal step allowed by regulation, principal has been given power of attorney to a party as represent in person for legal interest. Based on article 1338 Indonesian Civil Code Authorization on principle freedom of contract, The Power of Attorney can be form of hereby confers an irrevocable power of attorney. But article 1338Indonesian Civil Code has been restricted with article 1337 Indonesian Civil Code a cause is not permissible if it is prohibited by law, or if it violates good conduct, or public orderand article 85 paragraph 5 concerning Limited Liability Companies in the event that shareholders are present at the GMS in person, any power of attorney they have given shall not be valid for that meeting.In this Thesis in writer adopt a juridical normative and descriptive analyst method or research and relies on secondary data sources. For research matter this researchwill be explain the irrevocable power of attorney to attend and give a vote to General Meeting of Shareholders has been seen form all of regulations and the courts view from each decisions. Research conducted on the decision by judge, starting from the Court, High Court, and The Supreme Court to dispute between shareholders PT. Cipta Televisi Pendidikan Indonesia versus PT. Berkah Karya Bersama. Already found the answer irrevocable power of attorney still be revoked based on article 1337 Indonesian Civil Code and article 85 paragraph 5 concerning Limited Liability Companies., The power of attorney as a legal step allowed by regulation, principal has been given power of attorney to a party as represent in person for legal interest. Based on article 1338 Indonesian Civil Code Authorization on principle freedom of contract, The Power of Attorney can be form of hereby confers an irrevocable power of attorney. But article 1338Indonesian Civil Code has been restricted with article 1337 Indonesian Civil Code a cause is not permissible if it is prohibited by law, or if it violates good conduct, or public orderand article 85 paragraph 5 concerning Limited Liability Companies in the event that shareholders are present at the GMS in person, any power of attorney they have given shall not be valid for that meeting.In this Thesis in writer adopt a juridical normative and descriptive analyst method or research and relies on secondary data sources. For research matter this researchwill be explain the irrevocable power of attorney to attend and give a vote to General Meeting of Shareholders has been seen form all of regulations and the courts view from each decisions. Research conducted on the decision by judge, starting from the Court, High Court, and The Supreme Court to dispute between shareholders PT. Cipta Televisi Pendidikan Indonesia versus PT. Berkah Karya Bersama. Already found the answer irrevocable power of attorney still be revoked based on article 1337 Indonesian Civil Code and article 85 paragraph 5 concerning Limited Liability Companies.]

Abstrak :
Pemerintah bersama Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat dan Komisi Pemilihan Umum sepakat menetapkan penyelenggaraaan Pemilu serentak pada tahun 2024. Penyelenggaraan Pemilu tesebut mengakibatkan berakhirnya masa jabatan definitif bagi 271 kepala daerah pada rentang tahun 2022 dan 2023, oleh sebab itu kekosongan jabatan tersebut harus diisi oleh Penjabat Kepala Daerah. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode doktrinal, berdasarkan sumber data sekunder, sehingga pengumpulan informasinya dilakukan melalui studi kepustakaan. Metode analisis data yang digunakan adalah analisis kualitatif. Tulisan ini menganalisis implikasi pengangkatan penjabat kepala daerah terhadap hubungan pusat dan daerah pada masa transisi menuju Pemilu serentak tahun 2024 dengan pokok persoalan pertama mengenai kedudukan dan wewenang penjabat kepala daerah; dan kedua, mengenai implikasi pengangkatan penjabat kepala daerah terhadap hubungan pemerintah pusat dan pemerintah daerah. Tulisan ini menemukan bahwa mekanisme pengangkatan penjabat kepala daerah cenderung terpusat dengan memberikan porsi keterlibatan yang minim terhadap daerah. Kesimpulannya dalam konteks hubungan pusat dan daerah mekanisme pengangkatan penjabat mengakibatkan spanning of interest antara pemerintah pusat dan pemerintah daerah yang berimplikasi pada terjadinya sentralisasi kekuasaan. ......The government, together with the House of Representatives and the General Elections Commission, agreed to set simultaneous elections in 2024. The holding of the election resulted in the end of the definitive term of office for 271 regional heads between 2022 and 2023, therefore the vacancy must be filled by the Acting Regional Head. This research uses doctrinal methods, based on secondary data sources, so that the collection of information is carried out through literature studies. The data analysis method used is qualitative analysis. This paper analyzes the implications of the appointment of acting regional heads on central and regional relations during the transition period towards simultaneous elections in 2024 with the first point regarding the position and authority of acting regional heads; and second, regarding the implications of the appointment of acting regional heads on the relationship between the central government and local government. This paper found that the mechanism for appointing acting regional heads tends to be centralized by providing a minimal portion of involvement with the regions. In conclusion, in the context of central and regional relations, the mechanism for appointing acting officials resulted in a spanning of interest between the central government and local governments, which has implications for the centralization of power.

Abstrak :
Penelitian ini membahas mengenai Pemanfaatan Koleksi Umum di Kantor Perpustakaan dan Arsip Kota Administrasi Jakarta Timur. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui siapa yang memanfaatkan koleksi umum, tujuan pengguna memanfaatkan koleksi umum, subjek apa saja yang paling banyak dimanfaatkan pengguna serta hambatan yang dihadapi pengguna dalam memanfaatkan koleksi umum. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan menggunakan metode survei. Responden dalam penelitian ini adalah pengguna KPAK Jakarta Timur yang sedang memanfaatkan koleksi umum. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pelajar adalah pennguna yang paling banyak memanfaatkan koleksi umum KPAK Jakarta Timur, tujuan yang paling banyak adalah untuk menambah pengetahuan, subjek yang dimanfaatkan secara umum merata jumlahnya, dan hambatan yang paling sering ditemui adalah tidak ditemukannya koleksi di rak. ......The study focused about the utilization of general collection in Kantor Perpustakaan dan Arsip Kota Administrasi Jakarta Timur (KPAK Jaktim). The aim of this study are to discover the user, user's intention for the utilization of general collection, kind of subject that users used mostly, and the obstacle that users had when thei used the collection. This study used quantitative approaches with survey methods. The respondents in this study are the user that utilize general collection in KPAK Jaktim. The result of this study shown that the most user are students, the aim of the users used the collection to increase their knowledge, the subjects which used are the same average amount and the obstacle is the user didn't find the collection in the shelves.