Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Jika kawasan pada umumnya memilih untuk hanya mendukung universalitas HAM, maka tidak demikian bagi ASEAN. Ia mendukung prinsip universal melalui instrumen-instrumen HAM internasional. Dengan bersamaan, ia membuat AHRD yang turut mengatur bahwa HAM harus ditegakkan dengan mempertimbangkan partikularitas regional maupun nasional. Penelitian ini menganalisis bagaimana diskursus kontestasi HAM menjelaskan pembuatan AHRD tersebut. Penelitian ini berupaya mendapatkan penjelasan yang mendalam dan tuntas melalui pendekatan kualitatif dan interpretatif. Penelitian ini juga menggunakan logika dari Queer Theory yang memungkinkan untuk mengalisis kasus tersebut. Ternyata ditemukan bahwa ketika AHRD dianalisis dengan menggunakan teori tersebut, AHRD dapat dipahami sebagai dokumen yang menawarkan jawaban bagi kebutuhan realita sosial ASEAN. ...... Regions in general choose to only support universality in human rights. However, ASEAN supports universality through various international instruments. At the same time, the region also supports particularity through its AHRD by considering both regional and national particularities. This research aims to see how the contestation between both principles explain this case. In doing so, this research uses qualitative and interpretative approaces to achieve deep and thorough explanations. It also uses the logics of Queer Theory in realising such goal. When AHRD is analysed using that logic, it is found, that the document offers answers to ASEAN’s social reality.

Abstrak :
The adoption of the ASEAN Charter in 2007 represented a watershed moment in the organisation's history - for the first time the member states explicitly included principles of human rights and democracy in a binding regional agreement. Since then, developments in the region have included the creation of the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights in 2009 and the adoption of the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration in 2012. Despite these advances, many commentators ask whether ASEAN can take human rights seriously. The authors explore this question by comprehensively examining the new ASEAN human rights mechanisms in the context of existing national and international human rights institutions. This book places these regional mechanisms and commitments to human rights within the framework of the political and legal development of ASEAN and its member states and considers the way in which ASEAN could strengthen its new institutions to better promote and protect human rights.