Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penelitian ini menganalisis implikasi ideologis dari representasi atas ras dan gender di Modern Family. Dengan menggunakan analisis tekstual melalui close reading, penelitian ini berusaha untuk menjawab pertanyaan penelitian: bagaimanakah Modern Family melibatkan diri dengan ideologi ras dan gender yang dominan serta apakah implikasi ideologis akhir yang dihasilkan dari keterlibatan tersebut.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Modern Family melanggengkan ideologi ras dan gender yang dominan dan bukannya menentang hal tersebut. Dalam hal ras, Modern Family menujukkan superioritas orang kulit putih dibandingkan orang kulit berwarna. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga menunjukkan bahwa dalam penggambaran gendernya, Modern Family melanggengkan ideologi patriarki. Pada akhirnya, penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa Modern Family menyangkal misinya sendiri untuk menampilkan masyarakat modern Amerika.

---

This research examines the ideological implications of the representation of race and gender in Modern Family. Utilized with textual analysis through close reading, this research seeks to answer the research questions: how Modern Family engages with the dominant ideology of race and gender and what the final ideological implication of the engagement with the dominant ideology is.The findings of the research indicate that Modern Family further perpetuates dominant ideology of race and gender instead of challenging it. In terms of race, Modern Family suggests white people superiority over people of color. The research also reveals that in its gender depiction, the sitcom maintains the ideology of patriarchy. In the end, the thesis concludes that Modern Family contradicts its mission to present the modern day American society."

"ABSTRAKBahasa dan gender memiliki hubungan yang erat dan saling mempengaruhi satu sama lain. Penggunaan bahasa yangdipengaruhi oleh gender penuturnya merupakan bahasan dari variasi bahasa di dalam ilmu sosiolinguistik. Penelitianini menganalisis ciri bahasa pada pria dan wanita transgender di dalam Talk show Van Gils & Gasten dengan caramelacak konjungsi bertingkat penghubung gramatikal, konjungsi bertingkat penghubung logis, dan pronomina relatifuntuk mengetahui struktur kalimat majemuk bertingkat yang diungkapkan oleh kedua orang transgeder. Metode yangdigunakan adalah metode deskriptif kuantitatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa wanita transgender tetapmempertahankan ciri struktur kalimat pria karena ia cenderung lebih banyak menggunakan tiga jenis katapenghubung tersebut. Sementara, pria transgender cenderung lebih sedikit menggunakan tiga jenis kata penghubungtersebut meskipun ia telah berusaha memperlihatkan ciri struktur kalimat prianya. Percakapan langsung yangdilakukan oleh wanita transgender bernama Bo Van Spilbeeck dengan pria transgender bernama Emile Jacobs diacara Talk Show Van Gils & Gasten menunjukkan bahwa secara alami mereka masih tetap mempertahankan ciribahasa berdasarkan gender asli mereka.

---

ABSTRACTLanguage and gender have a close relation and they influence each other. The use of language that influenced byspeakers gender is a discussion of language variations in sociolinguistics. This research analyzes the languagecharacteristics of transgender man and woman in Van Gils & Gasten Talk Show by tracing grammaticalsubordinating conjunctions, logical subordinating conjunctions, and relative pronouns to find the complex sentencestructure expressed by both transgenders. The method used is descriptive quantitative method. The results of thisresearch indicate that transgender woman retains her man sentence structure because she tends to use these threetypes of conjunctions more. Meanwhile, transgender man tends to use fewer of these three types of conjunctionseven though he has tried to show the characteristic of his man sentence structure. Direct conversations conducted bytransgender woman named Bo Van Spilbeeck with transgender man named Emile Jacobs on Van Gils & Gasten TalkShow show that naturally they still retain their language characteristics based on their original gender."

"How are sexuality and erotic desire expressed in language?Do gay men and lesbians have a language of their own? Does ‘no’ always mean no? Is sexual desire beyond words? This lively and accessible textbook looks at how we talk about sex and why we talk about it the way we do.Drawing on a wide range of examples, from personal ads to phone sex, from sadomasochistic scenes to sexual assault trials, the book provides a clear introduction to the relationship between language and sexuality.Using a broad definition of ‘sexuality’, the book encompasses not only issues surrounding sexual orientation and identity, for instance whether gay men and lesbians use language differently from straight people, but also questions about the discursive construction of sexuality and the verbal expression of erotic desire. Cameron and Kulick contextualize their findings within current research in linguistics, anthropology and psychology, and bring together relevant theoretical debates on sexuality, gender, identity, desire, meaning and power. "

"Do women talk more than men? Does text messaging make you stupid? Can chimpanzees really talk to us? This fascinating textbook addresses a wide range of language myths, focusing on important big-picture issues such as the rule-governed nature of language or the influence of social factors on how we speak. Case studies and analysis of relevant experiments teach readers the skills to become informed consumers of social science research, while suggested open-ended exercises invite students to reflect further on what they've learned. With coverage of a broad range of topics (cognitive, social, historical), this textbook is ideal for non-technical survey courses in linguistics. Important points are illustrated with specific, memorable examples: invariant 'be' shows the rule-governed nature of African-American English; vulgar female speech in Papua New Guinea shows how beliefs about language and gender are culture-specific. Engaging and accessibly written, Kaplan's lively discussion challenges what we think we know about language"