Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penelitian ini mengenai bangunan berundak Situs Gunung Gentong yang terletak di Gunung Subang, Desa Legokherang Kecamatan Cilebak, Kuningan, Jawa Barat. Situs Gunung Gentong merupakan bangunan berundak dengan 6 teras dengan temuan berupa gentong, menhir, batu temugelang, batu lumpang, monolit, dan batu tegak. Bentuk bangunan berundak Situs Gunung Gentong belum diketahui. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimanakah bentuk bangunan berundak Situs Gunung Gentong, apakah berbentuk anak tangga atau kah berbentuk piramida, dan atau kah berbentuk pola baru yang belum ditemukan sebelumya. Langkah-langkah dalam penelitian ini adalah deskripsi bangunan dan temuan yang terdapat di bangunan berundak Situs Gunung Gentong, data tersebut kemudian dianalisis dengan menggunakan analisis bentuk, setelah itu dilakukan perbandingan antara Situs Gunung Gentong dengan konsep dan teori mengenai punden berundak megalitik yang telah diungkapkan oleh para ahli arkeologi. Hasil penelitian ini menjukkan bahwa bangunan berundak Situs Gunun Gentong merupakan bangunan megalitik yaitu punden berundak dan temuan yang terdapat di dalamnya adalah gentong, menhir, batu temugelang, batu lumpang, monolit, dan batu tegak. Situs Gunung Gentong memiliki bentuk anak tangga dan menjadi situs perantara di kawasan Gunung Subang. Dilihat dari bentuk bangunan dan temuan yang terdapat di punden berundak Situs Gunung Gentong ada kemungkinan bangunan ini digunakan untuk pemujaan.

---

This research on the building site of Mount Gentong terraces located on Mount Subang, Village District Legokherang Cilebak, Kuningan, West Java. Mount Gentong a building site with 6 terraces with the findings of the barrel, menhirs, stone enclosure, mortar stones, monoliths, and the upright stone. Shape of the building site of Mount Gentong is unknown. Problems in this study is how the shape of the building terraces of Mount Gentong Site, whether stair shaped or pyramid shaped, or whether new shape patterns that have not been found previously. The steps in this research is a description of buildings and the findings contained in the Site of Mount Gentong building terraces, the data are then analyzed using analysis of form, after it carried out the comparison between the site of Mount Gentong with concepts and theories about punden megalithic terraces that has been expressed by the archaeologist. The results of this study indicate that the building site of Mount Gentong terraces are the megalithic buildings which is punden terraces and the findings contained therein are the keg, menhirs, stone enclosure, mortar stones, monoliths, and the upright stones. The site Mount Gentong has the shape stairs and into the site an intermediary in the region of Mount Subang. Judging from the shape of the building and the findings contained in the Site of Mount Gentong punden terraces there is a possibility the building used for worship."

""Archaeological resource management (ARM) is the practice of recording, evaluating, preserving for future research and presenting to the public the material remains of the past. Almost all countries uphold a set of principles and laws for the preservation and professional management of archaeological remains. This book offers a critical and comparative perspective on the law and professional practices of managing archaeological remains. Beginning with a global history of ARM, John Carman provides an overview of legal and professional regulations governing ARM today. He then turns to consider the main practices involved in managing archaeological remains, namely, their identification and recording, their evaluation for 'significance', their preservation and their presentation to the public. As a whole, the book offers an overview of what ARM 'does' in the world, with implications for understanding the role of archaeology as a contemporary set of practices that determine how future generations will access material remains of the past"--"The management of the archaeological resource--that is, the globally-applicable practices of recording, evaluating, preserving for future research, and presenting to the public the material remains of the past--currently employs more professional archaeologists than any other branch of the field worldwide. It is particularly a field of increasing importance in archaeological education: specialist courses in archaeological resource management (ARM), archaeological heritage management (AHM), cultural resource management (CRM), cultural heritage management (CHM) and public archaeology (all synonyms for the same sub-field of archaeology) proliferate in universities across the globe at both the undergraduate and (especially) postgraduate level. Almost all countries have a system in place for the preservation and professional management of archaeological remains, usually grounded in a body of legislation. The principles upon which the management of the archaeological resource is conducted are held to be universally valid; accordingly the basic practices of its management are also similar the world over, although specific local circumstances make for differences in approach to these common functions. Using this fact as a basis on which to start, this book offers a critical approach to the specific professional practices deriving from those agreed principles to outline how archaeological resource management is done under different conditions in different parts of the world and what these may mean"--"