Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Perjanjian kemitraan merupakan pedoman bagi para pihak dalam melaksanakan suatu hubungan kemitraan yang berisi hak dan kewajiban para pihak. Dalam suatu hubungan kemitraan yang baik diperlukan diterapkannya suatu asas proporsionalitas agar tercipta bentuk hubungan kemitraan yang berlandaskan prinsip saling memerlukan, menguntungkan, dan memperkuat. Namun dalam perjanjian kemitraan GO-RIDE, PT GO-JEK Indonesia dan PT. Aplikasi Karya Anak Bangsa selaku perusahaan penyedia aplikasi dianggap merugikan mitra driver. Perjanjian kemitraan yang dibuat secara sepihak oleh perusahaan tersebut dianggap berdampak pada ketidakseimbangan hak dan kewajiban yang tidak mencerminkan keadilan dan asas proporsionalitas yang seharusnya diterapkan dalam perjanjian kemitraan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian kepustakaan dengan tipe penelitian yuridis-normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa asas proporsionalitas yang seharusnya diterapkan dalam perjanjian kemitraan GO-RIDE masih belum diterapkan dengan baik dalam tahap pra-kontraktual, pembentukan, isi, dan pelaksanaan kontrak.

---

Partnership agreement as the guideline for the parties in executing partnership project contains the rights and obligation of each party. In an ideal partnership agreement, it is very necessary to apply the principle of proportionality in order to create a form of partnership which is based on the mutual need, benefits of each party to create a win-win partnership. But in GO-RIDE partnership agreement, PT GO-JEK Indonesia and PT. Aplikasi Karya Anak Bangsa as the application provider company is considered to be detrimental to GO-RIDE driver. The partnership agreement which is made by the company is considered to have impact on the imbalance of rights and obligations that do not reflect justice and the principle of proportionality that should be applied in the partnership agreement. The research method used is library research with juridical-normative research type. The results of the study indicate that the principle of proportionality that should be applied in the GO-RIDE partnership agreement is still not well implemented in the pre-contractual, formation, content and implementation stages of the contract."

""With contributions from leading scholars in constitutional law, this volume examines how carefully designed and limited doctrines of proportionality can improve judicial decision-making, how it is applied in different jurisdictions, its role on constitutionalism outside the courts, and whether the principle of proportionality actually advances or detracts from democracy. Contributions from some of the seminal thinkers on the development of scholarship on proportionality (e.g. Alexy, Barak, and Beatty) extend their prior work and engage in an important dialogue on the topic. Some offer substantial critiques, others defend the doctrine and offer important clarifications and extensions of their prior work. Throughout, the authors engage not only with case law from around the world but also with existing scholarly treatments of the subject. Mathematical treatments are avoided, making the book accessible to readers from both 'soft' and hard' social science backgrounds"--"With contributions from leading scholars in constitutional law, this volume examines how carefully designed and limited doctrines of proportionality can improve judicial decision-making, how it is applied in different jurisdictions, its role on constitutionalism outside of courts and whether the principle of proportionality actually advances or detracts from democracy. Contributions from some of the seminal thinkers on the development of scholarship on proportionality (e.g. Alexy, Barak and Beatty) extend their prior work and engage in an important dialogue on the topic. Some offer substantial critiques, others defend the doctrine and offer important clarifications and extensions of their prior work. Throughout, the authors engage not only with case law from around the world, but also with existing scholarly treatments of the subject. Mathematical treatments are avoided, making the book accessible to readers from both 'soft' and hard' social science backgrounds"--"

""With contributions from leading scholars in constitutional law, this volume examines how carefully designed and limited doctrines of proportionality can improve judicial decision-making, how it is applied in different jurisdictions, its role on constitutionalism outside the courts, and whether the principle of proportionality actually advances or detracts from democracy. Contributions from some of the seminal thinkers on the development of scholarship on proportionality (e.g. Alexy, Barak, and Beatty) extend their prior work and engage in an important dialogue on the topic. Some offer substantial critiques, others defend the doctrine and offer important clarifications and extensions of their prior work. Throughout, the authors engage not only with case law from around the world but also with existing scholarly treatments of the subject. Mathematical treatments are avoided, making the book accessible to readers from both 'soft' and hard' social science backgrounds"--"With contributions from leading scholars in constitutional law, this volume examines how carefully designed and limited doctrines of proportionality can improve judicial decision-making, how it is applied in different jurisdictions, its role on constitutionalism outside of courts and whether the principle of proportionality actually advances or detracts from democracy. Contributions from some of the seminal thinkers on the development of scholarship on proportionality (e.g. Alexy, Barak and Beatty) extend their prior work and engage in an important dialogue on the topic. Some offer substantial critiques, others defend the doctrine and offer important clarifications and extensions of their prior work. Throughout, the authors engage not only with case law from around the world, but also with existing scholarly treatments of the subject. Mathematical treatments are avoided, making the book accessible to readers from both 'soft' and hard' social science backgrounds"--"

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai penerapan asas proporsionalitas dalam melandasi pembagian hak dan kewajiban antara Pemberi Waralaba dan Penerima Waralaba dalam setiap proses perjanjian waralaba. Asas proporsionalitas ini akan dilihat dari peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendapat ahli hukum. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan metode kepustakaan dan wawancara narasumber. Hasil penelitian ini adalah perjanjian waralaba yang dibuat oleh para pihak dinilai sah dan telah sesuai dengan ketentuan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Namun demikian, masih terdapat permasalahan dalam proses pembentukan dan pelaksanaan perjanjian yang kurang sesuai dengan ketentuan perundang-undangan mengenai waralaba. Permasalahan tersebut berpengaruh terhadap kurang tercapainya penerapan asas proporsionalitas yang baik dan fair. Penulis menyarankan agar pemerintah sebaiknya membuat ketentuan waralaba yang lebih spesifik dan terarah, serta lebih berorientasi pada prinsip proporsionalitas.

---

This thesis provides explanation regarding the implementation of principle of proportionality in distributing the rights and obligations for franchisor and franchisee in each process of franchise agreement, which will be observed from the perspective of law and doctrines. This thesis applies a normative legal study with bibligraphical method and interviews. Subsequently, it has discovered that the agreement made by the parties is valid and appropriate in accordance with the Indonesian Civil Code. However, there are considerable amount of matters in the process of formation and implementation of this agreement which do not comply with the current franchising law. These matters affect on how the principle of proportionality on this agreement cannot be achieved properly and fairly. The writer suggests that the government should provide more specific, direct and proportionality oriented provision on the franchising law."

"

---

ABSTRACTIn this study, Caroline Henckels examines how investment tribunals have balanced the competing interests of host states and foreign investors in determining state liability in disputes concerning the exercise of public power. Analyzing the concepts of proportionality and deference in investment tribunals' decision-making in comparative perspective, the book proposes a new methodology for investment tribunals to adopt in regulatory disputes, which combines proportionality analysis with an institutionally sensitive approach to the standard of review. Henckels argues that adopting a modified form of proportionality analysis would provide a means for tribunals to decide cases in a more consistent and coherent manner leading to greater certainty for both states and investors, and that affording due deference to host states in the determination of liability would address the concern that the decisions of investment tribunals unjustifiably impact on the regulatory autonomy of states."