Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKTesis ini mencoba membandingkan teknologi RDF dan SMIL untuk merepresentasikan data multimedia. Didalam tesis ini juga dimasukkan teknologi MPEG-7 sebagai bahan perbandingan studi litelatur. Pengujian dilakukan pada data multimedia seperti data text, suara, grafik dan video. Untuk RDF digunakan properti Dublin Core untuk melakukan representasi multimedia. Hasil percobaan menunjukkan bahwa RDF menggunakan Dublin Core dapat merepresentasikan tipe data text lebih baik dari SMIL, tapi SMIL dapat merepresentasikan tipe data grafik, audio dan video lebih baik dari RDF.

---

ABSTRACTThis thesis compares Resource Description Framework (RDF) and Synchonous Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL) for representing multimedia data. Our experiment using text, sounds, graphics and video data shows that the use of RDF with Dublin Core specification is better in representing text than the other data format. However SMIL is more suitable in representing graphics, audio and video daa."

"SHACL constraints checking merupakan proses validasi suatu RDF data graph terhadap suatu SHACL shapes graph. Pengembangan SHACL constraints checking pada umumnya menggunakan rule engine yang tertanam di dalam inti implementasinya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menginvestigasi apakah program SHACL constraints checking dapat dibangun di atas rule engine yang independen. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan melakukan implementasi pembuatan program SHACL constraints checking yang dibangun di atas rule engine Vertical Datalog (VLog). Program yang diimplementasikan pada penelitian ini dibangun menggunakan bahasa pemrograman Java serta menggunakan library Rulewerk dan Apache Jena. Berdasarkan implementasi yang telah dilakukan, program SHACL constraints checking dapat dibangun di atas rule engine VLog dengan melakukan serangkaian transformasi SHACL shapes graph dan RDF data graph menjadi rule syntax. Namun, pada penelitian ini program SHACL constraints checking yang dibangun hanya dapat memvalidasi SHACL Constraint sh:class, sh:datatype, sh:nodeKind,sh:minCount, sh:maxCount, sh:equals, sh:disjoint, sh:not, sh:and, sh:or, sh:xone, sh:node, sh:property. SHACL constraint lainnya tidak dapat diimplementasikan karena membutuhkan operasi regex dan perbandingan antar literal yang sulit untuk ditranslasi menjadi rule syntax.

---

SHACL constraints checking is a process to validate an RDF data graph againts a SHACL shapes graph. The development of SHACL constraints checking program usually use rule engine embedded on its own implementation. This research was aimed to investigate whether SHACL constraints checking program can be built on top of independent rule engine or not. This research will conduct the implementation of building SHACL constraints checking program on top of VLog Rule Engine. The program implemented in this research was built in Java programming language and was using Rulewerk and Apache Jena library. According to the implementation conducted in this research, SHACL constraints checking program can be built on top of VLog rule engine by transforming SHACL shapes graph and RDF data graph into rule syntax. But, the program can only validate SHACL constraint as follows: sh:class, sh:datatype, sh:nodeKind,sh:minCount, sh:maxCount, sh:equals, sh:disjoint, sh:not, sh:and, sh:or, sh:xone, sh:node, sh:property. Other SHACL constraints cannot be implemented in this research because those SHACL constraints requires regex operation and literal comparation which hard to be transformed into rule syntax."

"RDF database systems is a cutting-edge guide that distills everything you need to know to effectively use or design an RDF database. This book starts with the basics of linked open data and covers the most recent research, practice, and technologies to help you leverage semantic technology. With an approach that combines technical detail with theoretical background, this book shows how to design and develop semantic web applications, data models, indexing and query processing solutions."