Search Result  ::  Save as CSV :: Back

"Program revitalisasi Waduk Setiabudi Barat dilaksanakan dengan menerapkan collaborative governance. Penerapan collaborative governance ini memiliki peranan dalam pembangunan yang lebih transparan karena melibatkan masyarakat dalam pemecahan masalah. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah menganalisis proses penerapan collaborative governance yang terjadi dalam program revitalisasi Waduk Setiabudi Barat dengan menggunakan teori dari Ansell dan Gash. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan pendekatan post positivist. Data yang diperoleh dalam penelitian ini adalah data primer dari hasil wawancara mendalam dan data sekunder dari media serta dokumen lainnya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam proses penerapan collaborative governance yang dilakukan dalam program revitalisasi Waduk Setiabudi Barat, terdapat sejarah konflik dalam hal pergantian masa jabatan gubernur DKI Jakarta yang menyebabkan perbedaan penentuan program prioritas sehingga program revitalisasi Waduk Setiabudi Barat sempat terhenti pembahasannya sekitar 2 tahun (dari tahun 2017 hingga tahun 2019), kemudian terdapat keterlibatan banyak pemimpin baik secara formal maupun informal yang telah mendorong jalannya kolaborasi, terdapat beberapa peraturan yang mengatur jalannya kolaborasi, seperti yang tertuang pada Pergub Nomor 31 Tahun 2019 yang menjadi dasar untuk menyelesaikan program revitalisasi waduk secara kolaboratif, serta terdapat proses kolaboratif yang terjadi antara pemerintah provinsi DKI Jakarta, LSM, dan pihak swasta melalui PT. Ambal Aqar yang bertanggung jawab atas pemberian kompensasi KLB (Koefisien Luas Bangunan) sebagai bentuk hubungan collaborative governance yang terjadi dalam program revitalisasi Waduk Setiabudi Barat.

---

Collaborative governance is applied to accomplish the revitalization of the West Setiabudi Reservoir program. The implementation of collaborative governance involves the community in problem-solving and it contributes to being a more transparent in development. This study aims to analyze the process of implementing collaborative governance in revitalization of the West Setiabudi Reservoir program using Ansell and Gash's theory. This study used a post-positivist approach. Primary data from in-depth interview and secondary data from the media and other documents were used to compile the information for the research. The findings revealed that there was a history of conflict during the change in tenure of the governor of DKI Jakarta. Hence, it triggers the differences in program priorities, causing the revitalization of the West Setiabudi Reservoir program to be halted for about 2 years (from 2017 to 2019). Moreover, there is an interaction between many leaders, both formally and informally, who support the collaboration. Furthermore, there are several regulations that regulate the course of collaboration, as stated in Governor Regulation Number 31 of 2019, which is the basis for completing the revitalization of the reservoir program as collaboratively. In addition, there is a collaborative process that occurs between the DKI Jakarta provincial government, NGO, and the private sector represented by PT. Ambal Aqar, which is responsible for delivering KLB compensation (Building Area Coefficient) as part of the collaborative governance relationship that happens in revitalization of the West Setiabudi Reservoir program."

"[Tesis ini menganalis tentang bauran pemasaran produk daging sapi potong PD Dharma Jaya yang terdiri dari variabel produk, harga, promosi, distribusi dan personil dalam rangka revitalisasi peran PD Dharma Jaya berdasarkan persepsi pelanggan dan pegawai. Penelitian menggunakan metode kuantitatif yang diperkuat dengan observasi dengan jumlah sampel total 96 orang, wawancaraterbuka dan wawancara mendalam (in deepth interview). Uji beda 2 sampel menggunakan uji U Mann Whitney dipakai untuk menguji perbedaan persepsi antara pelanggan dan pegawai PD Dharma Jaya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan persepsi antara pelanggan dan pegawai untuk variabel produk, harga, promosi dan distribusi PD Dharma Jaya yang ditunjukkan dengan nilai probabilitas masing-masing variabel sebesar 0,000 atau di bawah level signifikansi sebesar 0,050. Berdasarkan hasil analisis kuesioner, observasi dan wawancara dengan pelanggan, pegawai dan pihak terkait, jika variabel bauran pemasaran diperbaiki, maka akan dapat mendukung upaya revitalisasi peran PD Dharma Jaya sebagai unsur Dewan Ketahanan Pangan Provinsi DKI Jakarta yaitu mewujudkan Ketahanan Pangan Daerah sebagai bagian dari Ketahanan Nasional.

---

This thesis is describe about marketing mix of PD Dharma Jaya?s meat product that consist of product, price, promotion and place in order to revitalize PD

Dharma Jaya?s role with customers and employees perception. This research is using quantitative method with survey of 96 total samples and strenghten with

observation, open interview and in deepth intervew. Mann-Whitney U test is used to test customers and employees? difference perception. And the results show that there is difference perception between customers and employees about product, price, promotion and place proven by probability value 0,000 for each variables or below level of significance 0,050. With analysis result from questionaires, observation and interview with customers, employees and related parties, improvement of marketing mix is needed to support the role revitalization effort of PD Dharma Jaya as the member of Food Security Board in Special Capital Region of Jakarta that is achieving Regional Food Security as a particulary of National Resilience. This thesis is describe about marketing mix of PD Dharma Jaya's meat product that consist of product, price, promotion and place in order to revitalize PD Dharma Jaya?s role with customers and employees perception. This research is using quantitative method with survey of 96 total samples and strenghten with

observation, open interview and in deepth intervew. Mann-Whitney U test is used to test customers and employees difference perception. And the results show that there is difference perception between customers and employees about product, price, promotion and place proven by probability value 0,000 for each variables or below level of significance 0,050. With analysis result from questionaires, observation and interview with customers, employees and related parties, improvement of marketing mix is needed to support the role revitalization effort of PD Dharma Jaya as the member of Food Security Board in Special Capital Region of Jakarta that is achieving Regional Food Security as a particulary of National Resilience.;This thesis is describe about marketing mix of PD Dharma Jaya’s meat product that consist of product, price, promotion and place in order to revitalize PD Dharma Jaya’s role with customers and employees perception. This research is using quantitative method with survey of 96 total samples and strenghten with observation, open interview and in deepth intervew. Mann-Whitney U test is used to test customers and employees’ difference perception. And the results show that there is difference perception between customers and employees about product, price, promotion and place proven by probability value 0,000 for each variables or below level of significance 0,050. With analysis result from questionaires, observation and interview with customers, employees and related parties, improvement of marketing mix is needed to support the role revitalization effort of PD Dharma Jaya as the member of Food Security Board in Special Capital Region of Jakarta that is achieving Regional Food Security as a particulary of National Resilience.;This thesis is describe about marketing mix of PD Dharma Jaya’s meat product

that consist of product, price, promotion and place in order to revitalize PD

Dharma Jaya’s role with customers and employees perception. This research is

using quantitative method with survey of 96 total samples and strenghten with

observation, open interview and in deepth intervew. Mann-Whitney U test is used

to test customers and employees’ difference perception. And the results show that

there is difference perception between customers and employees about product,

price, promotion and place proven by probability value 0,000 for each variables

or below level of significance 0,050. With analysis result from questionaires,

observation and interview with customers, employees and related parties,

improvement of marketing mix is needed to support the role revitalization effort of

PD Dharma Jaya as the member of Food Security Board in Special Capital

Region of Jakarta that is achieving Regional Food Security as a particulary of

National Resilience., This thesis is describe about marketing mix of PD Dharma Jaya’s meat product

that consist of product, price, promotion and place in order to revitalize PD

Dharma Jaya’s role with customers and employees perception. This research is

using quantitative method with survey of 96 total samples and strenghten with

observation, open interview and in deepth intervew. Mann-Whitney U test is used

to test customers and employees’ difference perception. And the results show that

there is difference perception between customers and employees about product,

price, promotion and place proven by probability value 0,000 for each variables

or below level of significance 0,050. With analysis result from questionaires,

observation and interview with customers, employees and related parties,

improvement of marketing mix is needed to support the role revitalization effort of

PD Dharma Jaya as the member of Food Security Board in Special Capital

Region of Jakarta that is achieving Regional Food Security as a particulary of

National Resilience.]"

"[Penelitian ini membahas mengenai evaluasi implementasi kebijakan revitalisasi kawasan Kota Tua di Jakarta. Jakarta sebagai ibukota negara memiliki suatu kawasan Kota Tua seluas ± 334 ha yang dulunya merupakan pusat kegiatan ekonomi dan pemerintahan pada tiga masa kekuasaan, dimulai dari masa pemerintahan Pangeran Jayakarta, masa penjajahan Portugis, dan masa penjajahan Belanda. Tingginya nilaibudaya dan sejarah di kawasan tersebut merupakan potensi pariwisata yang baik, oleh karena itu pemerintah DKI Jakarta membuat kebijakan revitalisasi Kota Tua Jakarta yang dimulai sejak masa pemerintahan Gubernur Ali Sadikin pada tahun 1970. Namun proses revitalisasi kawasan tersebut dianggap masih belum memenuhi harapan. Pada tahun 2014 revitalisasi dicanangkan kembali dengan diterbitkannya Peraturan Gubernur no. 36 tahun 2014 tentang Rencana Induk Kota Tua Jakarta dandiselenggarakan kerjasama pemerintah-swasta melalui konsorsium JOTRC (Jakarta Old Town Revitalization Corp.). Tujuan dilaksanakannya penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi implementasi kebijakan revitalisasi kawasan Kota Tua Jakarta, dan menganalisis evaluasi implementasi kebijakan revitalisasi kawasan tersebut. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan post-positivis. Penelitian ini menghasilkan temuan yaitu implementasi kebijakan revitalisasi Kota Tua Jakarta masih belum efektif. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi belum efektifnya kebijakan revitalisasi Kota Tua Jakarta antara lain karena status kepemilikan bangunan-bangunan yang beragam antara pribadi, swasta/BUMN, dan Pemprov DKI Jakarta. Sedikitnya bangunan yang dimiliki Pemprov DKI Jakarta membuat proses revitalisasi terhambat, ditambah lagi belum adanya leading sector dan minimnya SDM maupun anggaran dari Unit Pengelola Kawasan (UPK) Kota Tua Jakarta sebagai pengelola kawasantersebut. Namun dilakukannya kerjasama pemerintah-swasta dengan keberadaan konsorsium JOTRC merupakan upaya yang baik dalam melakukan percepatan pembangunan di kawasan Kota Tua. Beberapa saran yang diajukan dalam penelitian antara lain implementasi badan otorita yang mengelola kawasan Kota Tua Jakarta secepatnya sebagaimana diamanatkan dalam Pergub DKI Jakarta no. 36 tahun 2014, pelibatan ahli cagar budaya dalam setiap pemugaran di kawasan Kota Tua sehingga tidak merusak atau menghilangkan nilai historis bangunan tersebut, serta pelibatan masyarakat lokal dalam pembangunan kawasan Kota Tua.

---

This research discusses the evaluation of policy implementation of the revitalization of the Old Town area in Jakarta. Jakarta as the capital of the country has an Old Town area of ± 334 ha which was once the center of economic activity and government for three reigns, starting from the reign of Prince Jayakarta, the Portuguese colonial period, and the Dutch colonial period. The high value of the culture and history of the region is a potential for tourism, therefore, the local government make the revitalization of Jakarta old town area, which began during the reign of Governor Ali Sadikin in 1970. However, the process of revitalization of the area still has not met expectations. In 2014 revitalization proclaimed back with the issuance of the Peraturan Gubernur no. 36 tahun 2014 tentang Rencana Induk Kota Tua and held public-private partnership through a consortium called JOTRC (Jakarta Old Town Revitalization Corp.). The objective of this research is to analyze the factors that influence policy implementation of revitalization of the old city area, and analyzing the evaluation of policy implementation of revitalization of the region. The method used in this research is qualitative method with post-positivist approach. Results of this of this research is that the implementation of the Jakarta Old Town revitalization policies is still ineffective. Factors that influence the implementation of the policy is because of the ownership status of the buildings which vary between personal, private/state-owned enterprise, and local government plus the absence of leading sector and the lack of human resources and the budget of the Unit Pengelola Kawasan (UPK) Kota Tua as the area manager. But the establishment of JOTRC as a form of publicprivate partnership for revitalization of Jakarta old town is a good effort to accelerate the development in that area. Some suggestions from this research are immediate implementation of autonomous body that manages the old city area as mandated in Pergub no. 36 tahun 2014, the involvement of cultural heritage experts in development of the Old City area so as not to damage the historical value of the building, and empowerment of local communities. This research discusses the evaluation of policy implementation of the revitalization of the Old Town area in Jakarta. Jakarta as the capital of the country has an Old Town area of ± 334 ha which was once the center of economic activity and government for three reigns, starting from the reign of Prince Jayakarta, the Portuguese colonial period, and the Dutch colonial period. The high value of the culture and history of the region is a potential for tourism, therefore, the local government make the revitalization of Jakarta old town area, which began during the reign of Governor Ali

Sadikin in 1970. However, the process of revitalization of the area still has not met expectations. In 2014 revitalization proclaimed back with the issuance of the

Peraturan Gubernur no. 36 tahun 2014 tentang Rencana Induk Kota Tua and held public-private partnership through a consortium called JOTRC (Jakarta Old Town Revitalization Corp.). The objective of this research is to analyze the factors that influence policy implementation of revitalization of the old city area, and analyzing

the evaluation of policy implementation of revitalization of the region. The method used in this research is qualitative method with post-positivist approach. Results of this of this research is that the implementation of the Jakarta Old Town revitalization policies is still ineffective. Factors that influence the implementation of the policy is because of the ownership status of the buildings which vary between personal, private/state-owned enterprise, and local government; plus the absence of leading sector and the lack of human resources and the budget of the Unit Pengelola Kawasan (UPK) Kota Tua as the area manager. But the establishment of JOTRC as a form of publicprivate partnership for revitalization of Jakarta old town is a good effort to accelerate the development in that area. Some suggestions from this research are immediate implementation of autonomous body that manages the old city area as mandated in Pergub no. 36 tahun 2014, the involvement of cultural heritage experts in development of the Old City area so as not to damage the historical value of the building, and empowerment of local communities.;This research discusses the evaluation of policy implementation of the revitalization

of the Old Town area in Jakarta. Jakarta as the capital of the country has an Old Town

area of ± 334 ha which was once the center of economic activity and government for

three reigns, starting from the reign of Prince Jayakarta, the Portuguese colonial

period, and the Dutch colonial period. The high value of the culture and history of the

region is a potential for tourism, therefore, the local government make the

revitalization of Jakarta old town area, which began during the reign of Governor Ali

Sadikin in 1970. However, the process of revitalization of the area still has not met

expectations. In 2014 revitalization proclaimed back with the issuance of the

Peraturan Gubernur no. 36 tahun 2014 tentang Rencana Induk Kota Tua and held

public-private partnership through a consortium called JOTRC (Jakarta Old Town

Revitalization Corp.). The objective of this research is to analyze the factors that

influence policy implementation of revitalization of the old city area, and analyzing

the evaluation of policy implementation of revitalization of the region. The method

used in this research is qualitative method with post-positivist approach. Results of

this of this research is that the implementation of the Jakarta Old Town revitalization

policies is still ineffective. Factors that influence the implementation of the policy is

because of the ownership status of the buildings which vary between personal, private

/state-owned enterprise, and local government; plus the absence of leading sector and

the lack of human resources and the budget of the Unit Pengelola Kawasan (UPK)

Kota Tua as the area manager. But the establishment of JOTRC as a form of publicprivate

partnership for revitalization of Jakarta old town is a good effort to accelerate

the development in that area. Some suggestions from this research are immediate

implementation of autonomous body that manages the old city area as mandated in

Pergub no. 36 tahun 2014, the involvement of cultural heritage experts in

development of the Old City area so as not to damage the historical value of the

building, and empowerment of local communities., This research discusses the evaluation of policy implementation of the revitalization

of the Old Town area in Jakarta. Jakarta as the capital of the country has an Old Town

area of ± 334 ha which was once the center of economic activity and government for

three reigns, starting from the reign of Prince Jayakarta, the Portuguese colonial

period, and the Dutch colonial period. The high value of the culture and history of the

region is a potential for tourism, therefore, the local government make the

revitalization of Jakarta old town area, which began during the reign of Governor Ali

Sadikin in 1970. However, the process of revitalization of the area still has not met

expectations. In 2014 revitalization proclaimed back with the issuance of the

Peraturan Gubernur no. 36 tahun 2014 tentang Rencana Induk Kota Tua and held

public-private partnership through a consortium called JOTRC (Jakarta Old Town

Revitalization Corp.). The objective of this research is to analyze the factors that

influence policy implementation of revitalization of the old city area, and analyzing

the evaluation of policy implementation of revitalization of the region. The method

used in this research is qualitative method with post-positivist approach. Results of

this of this research is that the implementation of the Jakarta Old Town revitalization

policies is still ineffective. Factors that influence the implementation of the policy is

because of the ownership status of the buildings which vary between personal, private

/state-owned enterprise, and local government; plus the absence of leading sector and

the lack of human resources and the budget of the Unit Pengelola Kawasan (UPK)

Kota Tua as the area manager. But the establishment of JOTRC as a form of publicprivate

partnership for revitalization of Jakarta old town is a good effort to accelerate

the development in that area. Some suggestions from this research are immediate

implementation of autonomous body that manages the old city area as mandated in

Pergub no. 36 tahun 2014, the involvement of cultural heritage experts in

development of the Old City area so as not to damage the historical value of the

building, and empowerment of local communities.]"

"Penelitian ini membahas tentang revitalisasi pasar tradisional di Kota Semarang dengan mengambil kasus revitalisasi Pasar Johar. Permasalahan dalam revitalisasi Pasar Johar ini adalah kebijakan pembangunan pasar yang berupaya memperbaiki kondisi pasar ternyata tidak menguntungkan bagi para pedagang. Ada berbagai kepentingan dari pemerintah, pedgaang dan kelompok kepentingan yang memunculkan kekacauan. Kepentingan dari berbagai pihak tersebut berusaha untuk bisa mempengaruhi proses implementasi kebijakan. Hal ini kemudian menyebabkan proses pembangunan pasar tersebut diwarnai dengan konflik kepentingan antarpihak. Peneliti menggunakan teori Urban Regime Stone dan teori implementasi kebijakan Van Metter dan Horn sebagai pisau analisis. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan wawancara kepada sejumlah informan dari pemerintah dan pedagang Pasar Johar. Hasil dari penelitian adalah bahwa kepentingan pribadi dari berbagai pihak yang cukup kuat membuat koalisi antara pemerintah dengan pedagang tidak berjalan dengan baik. Sebagai urban regime, revitalisasi berhasil dalam pembangunan fisik gedung pasar, namun belum berhasil untuk mengembalikan perekonomian Pasar Johar. Keberhasilannya tampak pada penataan wilayah pasar menjadi lebih indah, rapi dan teratur. Akan tetapi hal yang belum berhasil dicapai dalam revitalisasi ini adalah kenaikan pedapatan pedagang di Pasar Johar. Selain itu, dalam implementasi kebijakan juga terjadi berbagai penyimpangan yang dilakukan oleh berbagai pihak.

---

This study discusses the revitalization of traditional markets in the city of Semarang by taking the case of Johar Market revitalization. The problem with revitalizing Johar Market is that market development policies that seek to improve market conditions turn out to be unprofitable for traders. There are various interests from the government, traders, and interest groups that cause chaos. The interests of these various parties seek to influence the policy implementation process. This then causes the market development process to be colored by conflicts of interest between parties. The researcher uses Urban Regime Stone theory and Van Metter and Horn's policy implementation theory as analysis tools. This study used a qualitative research method by interviewing a number of informants from the government and Johar Market traders. The results of the research are the personal interests of various parties that are strong enough to make disputes between the government and traders not go well. As an urban regime, the revitalization of the Johar market was successful in the physical construction of the market building, but it has not succeeded in restoring the Johar Market economy. Its success is seen in the arrangement of the market area to be more beautiful, neat and orderly. However, what has not been achieved in this revitalization is an increase in the income of traders at Pasar Johar. In addition, in the implementation of the policy, various irregularities were committed by various parties."