Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Rome Statute as an international agreement has the jurisdiction on the enforcement of the prosecution of grove human right violations. Although Indonesia attended the conference which endorsed the Rome Statute in 1998, in fact, the country has not yet ratified it ..."

"Pelaksanaan dan kepatuhan negara anggota Statuta Roma dalam melaksanakan permintaan kerjasama untuk menangkap dan menyerahkan sangatlah penting bagi  Mahkamah Pidana Internasional (ICC) dalam mencapai tujuannya untuk mengakhiri impunitas. Meskipun begitu, Pasal 98 Statuta Roma hadir sebagai bentuk pengesampingan dari kewajiban kerjasama tersebut. Salah satu negara anggota yang menggunakan pasal ini untuk tidak melakukan kewajiban kerjasamanya adalah Yordania dalam permintaan kerjasama ICC untuk menangkap dan menyerahkan Al Bashir. Menurut Yordania disini Pasal 98(1) berlaku sebab Al Bashir masih memiliki imunitas dan Pasal 98 (2) juga berlaku berdasarkan Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the League of the Arab States. Melalui metode penelitian hukum normatif yang berbasiskan pada data sekunder, hendak dianalisis apakah Pasal 98 benar berlaku di dalam kasus ini sehingga membuat Yordania tidak melanggar kewajibannya dengan tidak menangkap dan menyerahkan Al Bashir. Adapun melalui penelitian yang telah dilakukan, ditemukan kesimpulan bahwa pertimbangan ICC telah tepat bahwa Pasal 98 tidak berlaku dalam kasus ini. Oleh sebab itu penelitian ini menyarankan perlu dilakukan amandemen terhadap Pasal 98 khususnya untuk memperjelas terkait keberlakuannya terhadap negara yang menjadi subjek dari suatu rujukan Dewan Keamanan Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa (DK PBB). Selain itu mekanisme konsultasi yang tersedia dalam Pasal 97 Statuta Roma sebaiknya dapat menghasilkan suatu keputusan hukum yang mengikat terhadap pelaksanaan kerjasama oleh negara anggota. Dengan begitu setelah diputuskan di tahapan konsultasi bahwa tidak terdapat permasalahan yang diatur di Pasal 98, negara anggota wajib melaksanakan permintaan kerjasama tersebut.

---

The implementation and compliance of member states of the Rome Statute in carrying out requests for cooperation in arrest and surrender is essential for the International Criminal Court (ICC) in achieving its goal of ending impunity. Even so, Article 98 of the Rome Statute is present as a form of waiver of the cooperation obligation. One of the member states that use this article to not carry out its cooperation obligations is Jordan in the ICC's request for cooperation to arrest and hand over Al Bashir. According to Jordan, Article 98(1) applies because Al Bashir still has immunity and Article 98(2) also applies in accordance with the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the League of the Arab States. Through a normative legal research method based on secondary data, it will be analyzed whether Article 98 applies in this case so that Jordan does not violate its obligations by not arresting and handing over Al Bashir. As for the research that has been carried out, it was concluded that the ICC's consideration was correct in concluding Article 98 does not apply in this case. Therefore, this study suggests that it is necessary to amend Article 98 in particular to clarify its applicability to countries that are the subject of a United Nations Security Council (UNSC) referral. In addition, the consultation mechanism provided in Article 97 of the Rome Statute should be able to produce a binding legal decision on implementation of cooperation by member states. Thus, after it was decided at the consultation stage that there were no problems arising out of Article 98, member states were obliged to implement the request for cooperation. "

""This guide to the crime of aggression provisions under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) offers an exhaustive and sophisticated legal analysis of the crime's definition, as well as the jurisdictional provisions governing the ICC's exercise of jurisdiction over the crime. A range of practical issues likely to arise in prosecutions of the crime of aggression before the ICC are canvassed, as is the issue of the domestic prosecution of the crime. It also offers an insight into the geopolitical significance of the crime of aggression and the activation of the ICC's ability to exercise its jurisdiction over the crime. The author's intimate involvement in the crime's negotiations, combined with extensive scholarly reflection on the criminalisation of inter-State uses of armed force, makes this highly relevant to all academics and practitioners interested in the crime of aggression"--"

"Abstract:"The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court defines more than ninety crimes that fall within the Court's jurisdiction: genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and aggression. How these crimes are interpreted contributes to findings of individual criminal liability, and moreover impacts upon the perceived legitimacy of the Court. And yet, to date, there is no agreed approach to interpreting these definitions. This book offers practitioners and scholars a guiding principle, arguments and aids necessary for the interpretation of international crimes. Leena Grover surveys the jurisprudence of the ICTY and ICTR before presenting a model of interpretive reasoning that integrates the guidance within the Rome Statute itself with articles 31-33 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties""