Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Tesis ini fokus pada penyebab konflik bersenjata antara Thailand dan Kamboja terkait kuil Preah Vihear pada tahun 2008-2011. Tesis ini menganalisa mengenai faktor internal negara sebagai penyebab konflik bersenjata dengan berdasarkan Teori Democratic Peace. Terdapat tiga argumentasi dalam Teori Democratic Peace yang menjadi acuan, pertama argumentasi institusional, kedua argumentasi normatif, dan ketiga, argumentasi interdependensi ekonomi. Dalam argumentasi institusional maka pembuatan kebijakan luar negeri di Thailand dan Kamboja didominasi oleh elit. Kedua, dalam argumentasi normatif, elit Thailand dan Kamboja sulit diajak bekerjasama karena elit memiliki cara pandang konfliktual satu sama lain. Ketiga, dalam argumentasi interdependensi, hubungan ekonomi kedua negara ternyata tidak dapat menghindarkan kedua negara untuk tetap menggunakan cara kekerasan dan terlibat dalam konflik bersenjata.

---

ABSTRACT
The focus of this thesis is the armed conflict between Thailand and Cambodia 2008- 2011. The purpose of this research is to understand internal factors as the causes of the armed conflict between Cambodia and Thailand concerning Preah Vihear Temple. The data was collected through the library and document study. Based on the theory of Democratic Peace, there are three arguments, the first, institutional arguments, second, normative argument, and the third, the argument of economic interdependence. The results of this research shows in the institutional argument, that decision making process in Thailand and Cambodia is dominated by elites. Second, the normative argument, the Thai and Cambodian elites have the perspective conflictual one another. Third, the argument is about the interdependence of economic relations between the two countries were not significant to avoid the two countries to use violence each other.

Abstrak :
Skripsi ini membahas tentang kepentingan aktor politik Kamboja dan Thailand hingga memunculkan konflik perbatasan kuil Preah Vihear 2008-2011. Penelitian dengan metode kualitatif memiliki fokus kepada perbedaan kepentingan dari Perdana Menteri Kamboja Hun Sen bersama Cambodian 39;s People Party CPP dengan Perdana Menteri Thailand Abhisit Vejjajiva bersama Democracy Party PD yang kemudian digantikan oleh Yingluck Shinawatra bersama Partai Pheu Thai dalam mempengaruhi konflik. Mengacu pada teori konflik Pruit dan Rubin, penelitian ini membuktikan dengan adanya perbedaan kepentingan dari perdana menteri dan partai politik mampu menimbulkan konflik perbatasan diantara Kamboja dan Thailand. Konflik perbatasan ini didasari kepentingan aktor politik yang memiliki tujuan untuk mendapatkan kekuasaan di negara masing-masing. ......This bachelor thesis discussed about the interests of both Cambodia 39 s and Thailand 39 s political actors which became the cause of border conflicts around it from 2008 to 2011. This research, used qualitative method and focused difference of interests between Hun Sen, Prime Minister of Cambodia from Cambodian 39 s People Party CPP , and Prime Minister of Thailand, Abhisit Vejjajiva from Democracy Party PD , which in turn was succeeded by Yingluck Shinawatra from Pheu Thai Party. Their interests undoubtedly determines the course of conflict. By using Pruit and Rubin 39 s theory of conflict, this research proved that the existence of difference of interests between Cambodia 39 s and Thailand 39 s Prime Ministers caused border conflicts between Cambodia and Thailand. This conflicts were based on the interests of political actors who had the same goal to gain power in each of their countries.

Abstrak :
Since it began in 2008, the dispute over the temple of Preah Vihear and its adjacent area has envenomed Thai-Cambodian relations. Puangthong R. Pawakapan argues that initially Thai-Cambodian cooperation on the temple had begun within the framework of Thailand’s strategy to become a regional economic centre and leader. It was the first time in Southeast Asia that two formerly antagonistic states were employing cultural methods to settle a territorial dispute and turned it into a symbol of friendship and cooperation between the two countries.