Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKTekanan waktu dapat mempengaruhi pembentukan social loafing. Jurnal ini mempunyai tujuanuntuk menginvestigasi pembentukan social loafing antar partisipant dalam kondisi dimana merekadiberi tekanan waktu. Riset ini menggunalan 36 murid dari The University of Queensland kampusSt. Lucia dengan 2x2 between group design yang dimana participant akan diminta untukmengerjakan tugas secara individu (koaktif) atau berkelompok (kolektif) dalam kondisi dibawahtekanan atau tidak dibawah tekanan. Hasil dari riset ini akan menhitung jumlah jawaban yang samauntuk menginvestigasi pembentukan social loafing. Hasil Independent t-test menyatakan bahwatidak ada perbedaaan significant antar kelompok coactive dan collective , t (1,34) = -1.77, p = .086.Ditambah lagi hasil menunjukan bahwa tidak ada hasil significant antar kelompok yang diberitekanan waktu dan kelompok yang tidak diberi tekanan waktu , t (1,34) = 0.97 p = .350. Hal inibisa terjadi dikarenakan tugas yang diberikan kepada participant terlalu menarik. Ini menunjukanbahwa tekanan waktu tidak selalu mempengaruhi fenomena social loafing terutama jika tugas yangdiberikan menarik. Riset dengan tugas yang lebih kurang menarik sangat disarankan untukdilakukan.

---

ABSTRACTTime pressure might affect the occurrence of social loafing. Therefore, this study has an aim toinvestigate whether social loafing occur in condition where participants had time pressure. Thisstudy conducted among 36 students from The University of Queensland St Lucia campus with 2x2between group design where the participants were asked to do the task individually (coactive) orcollectively in either under time pressure or non-time pressure. The study would measure whetherthe participants engage in social loafing by looking how many similar words found in the result.An independent t-test result revealed that there was no significant difference between collectiveand coactive work, t (1,34) = -1.77, p = .086. Moreover, non-significant result also found betweencollective participants under non-time pressure with collective participant under time-pressure, t(1,34) = 0.97 p = .350, this was possible because the task given to the participant was toointeresting. This indicate that time pressure did not always affect social loafing, especially whenthe task is interesting. Further research about time pressure and social loafing experiment with taskthat was not too interesting for the participants is highly recommended."

"[ABSTRAK Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui perbedaan dalam perilaku social loafing antara mahasiswa dari berbagai negara di Asia dengan mahasiswa dari Australia. Partisipan dalam penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa University of Queensland, yang dibagi menjadi dua kelompok kondisi yaitu kondisi kerja kelompok koaktif atau kerja kelompok kolektif. Masing-masing kondisi terdiri dari antara mahasiswa Asia atau mahasiswa Australia. Partisipan diberikan mental task dan kemudian performanya diukur untuk menunjukkan tendensi perilaku social loafing. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa meskipun tidak ada perbedaan signifikan antara kelompok koaktif dan kolektif, mahasiwa Australia pada kelompok koaktif bekerja lebih baik dibanding mahasiswa Asia pada kelompok koaktif. Hasil dari penelitian ini mengindikasi bahwa budaya individualistik barat menunjukkan performa kerja lebih baik dibanding budaya kolektivis timur ketika ditempatkan pada kondisi kelompok kerja koaktifABSTRACTThis research is done to investigate the differences in social loafing between Asians students from various Asian countries and Australian students. Participants were university students who were divided into either a coactive or collective work condition. Each work condition consisted of either Asians or Australians. Participants were given a mental task and the performance on this task was measured to represent social loafing. The results revealed that although there was no significant difference between coactive and collective groups, Australians in a coactive setting performed better than Asians in a coactive setting. The results of this study indicate that western individualistic cultures perform better than eastern collectivistic cultures on a task if they are put in a coactive work setting;This research is done to investigate the differences in social loafing between Asians students from various Asian countries and Australian students. Participants were university students who were divided into either a coactive or collective work condition. Each work condition consisted of either Asians or Australians. Participants were given a mental task and the performance on this task was measured to represent social loafing. The results revealed that although there was no significant difference between coactive and collective groups, Australians in a coactive setting performed better than Asians in a coactive setting. The results of this study indicate that western individualistic cultures perform better than eastern collectivistic cultures on a task if they are put in a coactive work setting, This research is done to investigate the differences in social loafing between Asians students from various Asian countries and Australian students. Participants were university students who were divided into either a coactive or collective work condition. Each work condition consisted of either Asians or Australians. Participants were given a mental task and the performance on this task was measured to represent social loafing. The results revealed that although there was no significant difference between coactive and collective groups, Australians in a coactive setting performed better than Asians in a coactive setting. The results of this study indicate that western individualistic cultures perform better than eastern collectivistic cultures on a task if they are put in a coactive work setting]"