Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Indonesia sebagai negara multikultural terintegrasi dalam semboyan Bhineka Tunggal Ika sebagai simbol persatuan. Pada kenyataannya masih ada etnis yang mengalami diskriminasi yaitu etnis Cina, hingga sekarang kitapun masih bisa melihat adanya sentimen yang diarahkan kepada mereka. Pemisahan etnis tertentu akan mengganggu ketahanan nasional. New Museum mengubah paradigma museum dari tempat pameran masa lalu menjadi tempat pendidikan dan media komunikasi untuk kepentingan masa kini dan masa depan. Etnis Cina harus direpresentasikan di museum sebagai cara untuk merangkul dan sebagai simbol pengakuan negara terhadap minoritas. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat sejauh mana museum nasional Indonesia mengakomodir etnis Cina dan kendala apa yang dihadapi serta cara untuk mengatasinya. Dan juga menunjukkan sejauh mana pemerintah menggunakan museum sebagai sarana pembentuk integrasi nasional. Penelitian menunjukkan etnis Cina belum direpresentasikan karena Museum Nasional Indonesia masih terjebak dalam konsep traditional museum yang berfokus koleksi dan masa lalu.......Indonesia as a multicultural country is integrated in the motto of Bhinneka Tungga Ika or Unity in Diversity as a symbol of unity. But now adays, there are still ethnic groups that discriminated like Chinese Ethnic as we can still see the sentiment pointed to them. The Segregation of certain ethnic will disrupt national resilience. New Museum transforms the paradigm of the museum from the place of the past exhibition into a place of education and communication media for the benefit of both present and the future. Chinese Ethnic must be represented in museums as a way to embrace and symbolize state recognition of minorities. This research aims to see the extent to which the Museum Nasional Indonesia accommodates the Chinese and what obstacles are faced and ways to overcome them. And also shows the extent to which the government uses museum as a means of forming national integration. This research shows that Chinese minority has not been represented because Museum Nasional Indonesia are still trapped in traditional museum concepts."

"This paper reviews at how democracy in Indonesia is evolving, both as institution and as an idea in the minds of its citizen. The relationship between the central government and the regions in Indonesia are undergoing change, with a serous challenge to central authority along with related moves to decentralized political authority and economic responsibility."

"This paper argues and shows how ethnic dimension is stillvery important in understanding political contestations inMalaysia. To do this, the paper reviews the political as wellas population demography to back its assertion. And it isnot necessarily improper to continue to use this ethnic lens,although the continued use of this approach has comeunder heavy criticism both within and from outsideMalaysia. Raging debates in Malaysia and by Malaysians arestill very much shaped by ethnicity and increasing regionaldifferences. This is further compounded by other factorssuch as religion, language, and education. In fact, thesetools have been more intensely used of late compared toany period before in history as they easily politicize andattract followers."

"Building /ndonesiaism in cultural context is determined by the position of culture in the paradigm used By understanding the cultural position in a paradigm, we can comprehend the mode of lndonesiaism. This article discusses the position of culture in the three paradigms of cultural anthropology, namely evolutionism, structural .functionalism, and symbolic interpretivism and their implications for development of lndonesiaism. First, historically the three paradigms represent the three dominant modes of thought in treating humans as study objective. Humans are consecutively positioned as very objective, objective and subjective. Second, as the effects of the first, researcher's or policy makers 'pos1iion is sequentially very authoniarian, authoritarian, and not authoritarian. The three paradigms had ever been operationalized in building Jndonesiaism. In their subjective position people express their freedom to express thoughts and primordial identities in Indonesian present situation. There has been a shift from culture of polliics to politic of culture. Unlike the authoritarian New Order positioning citizens as object in structural­ fanctionalism paradigm that made strong national integration preserved for more than three decades, the paradigm shift to emphasize freedom nowadays leads to potentially degrading national integration. "

"Masalah dalam penelitian ini ialah bagaimana kaitan antara etnik keturunan Arab dengan integrasi nasional Indonesia dalam perspeksif ketahanan nasional. Siapa keturunan Arab itu, bagaimana identitas kelompok dan interaksi sosialnya serta aspek-aspek apa yang memiliki potensi serta menghambat integrasinya dengan penduduk pribumi. Demikian pula bagaimana sikap dan pandangannya terhadap penduduk pribumi dan begitu pula sebaliknya. Data yang terkumpul melalui teknik kuesioner terhadap 140 orang responden (70 orang dari keturunan Arab dan 70 orang dari pribumi ), wawancara dengan 23 orang keturunan Arab dan pribumi, observasi langsung dan data kepustakaan, dianalisis dengan metoda analisis deskriptif. Dari hasil penelitian, dapat digambarkan bahwa keturunan Arab yang terdapat di beberapa lokasi dan daerah dan tersebar di seluruh Indonesia, kakek moyangnya adalah orang Arab yang umumnya berasal dari Hadramaut yang menetap tinggal dan berkembang di Indonesia turun-temurun melalui lembaga perkawinan dengan wanita penduduk pribumi. Beberapa faktor yang merupakan identitas kelompok keturunan Arab seperti faktor bahasa, pendidikan, organisasi sosial, organisasi politik, yang semestinya keturunan Arab mendukungnya sebagai solidaritas kelompoknya, ternyata tidak mendukungnya sehingga solidaritas kelompoknya tipis atau lemah, yang akibatnya mereka berinteraksi dan berintegrasi dalam berbagai aspek kehidupan dengan kelompok lain di luar kelompoknya / pribumi sehingga terbinalah komunikasi dan kebersamaan dalam masyarakat majemuk Indonesia, dan kondusif bagi ketahanan nasional. Faktor waktu keberadaan keturunan Arab yang telah lama, telah memberi kesempatan kepada mereka untuk menyerap dan terpengaruh oleh kebudayaan setempat sehingga walaupun asalnya dari tanah Arab, mereka tidak berorientasi ke tanah leluhurnya itu, tapi berorientasi Indonesia, memiliki sense of belonging, merasa Indonesia tanah airnya, terlibat dalam berbagai perjuangan kemerdekaan dan pembangunan Indonesia. Sikap dan pandangan positif penduduk pribumi terhadap keturunan Arab dan demikian pula sebaliknya, memiliki makna positif bagi terbinanya kebersamaan dan saling harga menghargai sehingga kondusif bagi ketahanan lingkungan, daerah dan bemuara pada ketahanan nasional."

"ABSTRAKPendahuluan Latar Belakang Apabila memperhatikan negara-negara berkembang yang baru merdeka, masyarakat manusia dalam memperjuangkan hidup untuk mencapai kekuasaan bergerak dan periode "Satu orang yang berkuasa (monarki) ke beberapa orang yang berkuasa (oligarki) dan berakhir pada semua orang berkuasa (demokrasi)". Ungkapan diatas menurut Arief Budiman dewasa ini ada banyak negara yang berada pada periode semua orang berkuasa (demokrasi). Kemerdekaan pada periode demokrasi yang telah dicapai negara-negara berkembang bukanlah suatu proses pergerakan yang mudah dan tanpa perjuangan, tetapi cukup banyak tantangan yang harus dihadapi, terutama bagi bangsa yang lahir sebagai masyarakat majemuk seperti Indonesia. Suatu perjuangan menegakkan pesatuan dan kesatuan bangsa ternyata pada banyak negara berkembang justru nampaknya lebih berat dari pada memenangkan kemerdekaan. "

"Di era reformasi dituntut adanya perubahan baik dalam bidang politik, social maupun ekonomi. Untuk memenuhi tuntutan perubahan tersebut, maka peran partai politik sebaiknya ditingkatkan. Partai Golongan Karya (Golkar) sebagai salah satu partai politik yang merupakan salah satu pilar utama demokrasi harus menunjukkan eksistensinya secara menyeluruh, terpadu dan terencana, namun hingga saat ini eksistensi tersebut belum menunjukkan hasil yang maksimal. Berdasarkan haI tersebut diatas, maka penulis akan mengadakan penelitian tentang :1. Apakah demokratisasi internal Partai Golkar telah sejalan dengan nilai-nilai demokrasi2. Sejauhmana demokratisasi internal Partai Golkar mampu meningkatkan Integrasi Bangsa ?3. Sejauhmana demokratisasi internal Partai Golkar mampu meningkatkan Ketahanan Nasional ? Penelitian akan difokuskan kepada persepsi atau tanggapan pimpinan partai DPP Partai Golkar, Pimpinan KINO, Pimpinan DPD I Partai Golkar DKI Jakarta dan Pimpinan DPD II Partai Golkar se- DKI Jakarta terhadap Demokratisasi Internal yang dilakukan Partai Golkar dalam meningkatkan Ketahanan Nasional. Untuk mengetahui penelitian tersebut dilakukan dengan menggunakan Paradigma Konstruktivisme. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode kualitatif, dengan melakukan perbandingan dan hasil interaksi antara peneliti dan yang diteliti serta cara pandang terhadap obyek penelitian. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa persepsi terhadap peran Demokratisasi Internal Partai Golkar dalam meningkatkan Ketahanan Nasional yang dilakukan oleh Partai Golkar telah sejalan dengan nilai-nilai demokrasi, mampu meningatkan Integrasi Bangsa dan meningkatkan Ketahanan Nasional, maka berdasarkan hasil penelitian Proses Demokratisasi Internal Partai Golkar adalah verifikasi. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat bermanfaat secara akademis dan berguna bagi Pimpinan Partai dan mahasiswa pada masa yang akan datang.

---

In this reform era changes are demanded either in political, social or economic areas. In order to fulfill the change demands, then the role of political parties need to be improved. Golongan Karya (Golkar) party one of major political parties is one of main democratic pillars should show its existence in comprehensive, integrated and planned manner, however until now this existence has not shown the maximum results.

Based on the above matter, then the writer is going to conduct a research concerning:

1. Has Golkart Party's internal democratization run in accordance with democratic values?

2. How far Golkar Party's internal democratization is capable to improve National Integration?

3. How far Golkar Party's internal democratization is capable to improve National Resilience?

This research would be focused on perception or response of the leaders of Golkar Party Central Board, KIND Leaders, Provincial Board of Greater Jakarta Golkar Party and Leaders of RegentallCity Board Golkar Party of Capital Jakarta in improving National Resilience. To implement the research by conducting Constructivism Paradigm.

Research methodology that used is qualitative methodology, by comparing and interaction results between the researcher and research object and point of view to the research object.

Based on research results, then it is concluded that the perception toward the role of Golkar Party Internal Democratization by improving National Resilience conducted by Golkar Party has been in line with democratic values, capable to improve National Integration and improve National Resilience, so based on the research results the Internal Democratization Process of Golkar Party is verification.

This research is hoped to be beneficial academically in brings benefits for the Party Leader and students in the future."

"The study was motivated by the writer's concern on the accumulating phenomena of national disintegration in many parts of Indonesian territory, and this situation influenced the restlessness and instability among the young generation, in this case the senior high school student , regarding to their identity and nationality...."

"This paper discusses the building of rational and integrative historical consciousness to sustain the vision of Indonesia Onward. This is inseparable from what has happened lately, that there have emerged several fictitious empires by an unreasonable historical claim and considered to threaten the national integration. Based on this phenomenon and the study of concept through literature study, this paper aims to provide a more comprehensive understanding of historical consciousness that needs to be built amid society, especially during the post-truth era at this time. Historical consciousness is very important because both critical thinking and nationalism can be developed. The latest phenomenon has become a momentum that building historical consciousness should be more encouraged to anticipate the destructive effects of information technology advances, such as hoax that leads to criminal cases and harms many people. If traced back, this problem was not new. Historians have long reminded the importance of building historical consciousness. The role of each party is very important, starting from academics, education, to the wider community. Therefore, building historical consciousness does not mean out of date. Many innovations can be done so historical consciousness still has relevance to the present and future. Thus, historical consciousness can become increasingly real and history can be felt to belong to all."