Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Fasilitas Produksi Oil X akan memanfaatkan hasil samping gas alam yang mengandung 1,8 vol H2S dan 45 vol CO2sebagai fuel. AGRU perlu dibangun untuk mendapatkan spesifikasi 100 ppmv H2S dengan kandungan CO2 berkisar 30 ndash; 35 vol. Gas umpan capacity adalah 39 MMScfd. MDEA dipilih karena selectivitas terhadap H2S. Studi simulasi dengan menggunakan Proses Simulator ini diharapkan dapat memperoleh kondisi operasi AGRU yang optimum, yaitu konsentrasi MDEA, suhu kolom absorber,dan tekanan stripper; yang dapat memberikan biaya paling rendah untuk pemisahan H2S dan CO2secara simultan pada konsentrasi gas asam yang tinggi dan tekanan gas yang rendah. Kondisi optimum operasi AGRU yang diperoleh adalah 40 berat konsentrasi MDEA, suhu lean amine masuk kolom absorber 52 oC dan tekanan stripper 200 kPa; yang menghasilkan kandungan CO2 33,4 vol dan kandungan H2S 37 ppmv dalam fuel gas. Laju Alir Sirkulasi MDEA adalah 597 m3/hr. Biaya separasi untuk kondisi optimum adalah 1,0 /MMBtu fuel gas yang dihasilkan.

---

ABSTRACT
Oil Production Facility X plant to utilize its side product of natural gas which content 1,8 vol H2S and45 vol CO2 as internal usage fuel gas. AGRU is installed to get fuel gas spesification of 100 ppmv H2S with 30 ndash 35 vol CO2. Feed Gas capacity is 39 MMScfd. MDEA is selected due to its H2S selectivity solvent. This simulation study using Process Simulator focuses to get optimum AGRU operation parameters, such as MDEA concentration, Absorber temperature, and Stripper pressure which will result the lowest cost for simultanoeus H2S and CO2 removal at high acid gas concentration and low pressure.Optimum AGRU operation parameters results are 40 weight MDEA concentration 52oC Lean Amine temperature to Absorber and Stripper Pressure of 200 kPa which results CO2 content of 33,4 vol and H2S content of 37 ppmv in fuel gas product. MDEA circulation rate is 597 m3 hr. Separation cost for this optimum condition is 1,0 MMBtu fuel gas product.

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK Studi ini merupakan kajian mengenai pengaruh skenario Wellhead Cluster, Flowline dan fasilitas pemisahan gas asam atau Acid Gas Removal Unit (AGRU), terhadap investasi yang diperlukan dalam pengembangan suatu lapangan gas baru. Terdapat dua skenario Wellhead Cluster, dimana dalam Skenario-1 diasumsikan gas dari setiap Wellhead Cluster akan dialirkan langsung oleh Flowline menuju Separator dan fasilitas AGRU yang terdapat di CPP (Central Processing Plant), sedangkan dalam Skenario-2 diasumsikan Separator dan fasilitas AGRU terletak di salah satu Wellhead Cluster. Sweet gas, Produced Water dan Condensate hasil proses dialirkan dengan pipeline menuju CPP. Biaya investasi untuk masingmasing skenario akan dibandingkan dengan menggunakan variasi bebas : tekanan parsial H2S, laju alir dan jarak antara Wellhead Cluster dengan CPP. Hasil penelitian menyarankan bahwa Skenario-2 lebih baik karena membutuhkantotal biaya investasi yang lebih kecil dibanding Skenario-1, kecuali untuk kondisi dimana laju alir maksimum 10 MMSCFD dan jarak antara Wellhead Cluster dengan CPP hingga 1 km, dimana Skenario-1 lebih baik dibandingkan dengan Skenario-2.

---

ABSTRACT This study is about the influence of Wellhead Cluster scenario, Flowline and Acid Gas Removal Unit (AGRU) toward investment needed in developing new gas field. There are two scenarios, where in Scenario-1 it is assumed that gas from each Wellhead Cluster will go directly by Flowline to Separator and AGRU facility which is located in CPP (Central Processing Plant). Meanwhile in Scenario-2, it is assumed that Separator and AGRU facility are located in one of the Wellhead Clusters. Sweet gas, Produced Water and Condensate output from the process are delivered to CPP by pipeline. Investment cost for each scenario will be checked using free variation : H2S partial pressure, flow rate and distance between Wellhead Cluster and CPP. The study which results that Scenario-2 is better then Scenario-1, because it requires less investment cost compared to Scenario-1, except for condition where maximum flow rate is 10 MMSCFD and distance between Wellhead Cluster to CPP is up to 1 km, then Scenario-1 is better than Scenario-2.;This study is about the influence of Wellhead Cluster scenario, Flowline and Acid Gas Removal Unit (AGRU) toward investment needed in developing new gas field. There are two scenarios, where in Scenario-1 it is assumed that gas from each Wellhead Cluster will go directly by Flowline to Separator and AGRU facility which is located in CPP (Central Processing Plant). Meanwhile in Scenario-2, it is assumed that Separator and AGRU facility are located in one of the Wellhead Clusters. Sweet gas, Produced Water and Condensate output from the process are delivered to CPP by pipeline. Investment cost for each scenario will be checked using free variation : H2S partial pressure, flow rate and distance between Wellhead Cluster and CPP. The study which results that Scenario-2 is better then Scenario-1, because it requires less investment cost compared to Scenario-1, except for condition where maximum flow rate is 10 MMSCFD and distance between Wellhead Cluster to CPP is up to 1 km, then Scenario-1 is better than Scenario-2.