Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKStudi ini terkait dengan kredo Anarkisme Epistemologis dari PaulFeyerabend. Masalah yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini adalah: 1 Apapengertian dari Anarkisme Epistemologis Paul Feyerabend sekaligus bagaimanaperbedaannnya dengan bentuk-bentuk anarkisme yang lain. Dalam kerangkadekonstruksi pengetahuan secara lebih luas, apa-apa saja konsep kunci darianarkisme epistemologis Paul Feyerabend? 2 Bagaimana implikasi filosofissekaligus praktis dari gerakan Anti Metode dengan kredo AnarkismeEpistemologis Paul Feyerabend? 3 Bagaimana bentuk-bentuk kritik terhadapAnarkisme Epistemologis Feyerabend dari kelompok yang masihmempertahankan nilai-nilai obyektivitas ilmu pengetahuan?Penulisan tesis ini, memilih bentuk penelitian komparatif; membandingkandua atau lebih filsuf atau aliran. Itu berarti: merupakan visi-visi mengenai hakikatmanusia, dunia dan Tuhan, yang pembahasan ketiganya, merupakan hal yanginheren, di dalam diskursus Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan. Tentu dengan beragampenyikapan para filosof menyangkut pembahasan ketiga isu itu. Untuk membahassecara lebih mendalam pemikiran Feyerebend berikut perbandingan lewat kritikdari para filosof lain, maka memerlukan penelitian kepustakaan yang berusahamengungkap makna teks lewat metode hermeneutika secara analitis, sintetis sertakritis sekaligus.Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan 1 Pengertian dari AnarkismeEpistemologis Feyerabend ini adalah wujud dekonstruksi terhadap metodologiilmiah untuk memecahkan kemandegan dari teori klasik yang telah sampai padasituasi krisis yang dalam. Teori Feyerabend ini adalah kritik telak terhadappositivism yang sangat berbeda dengan anarkisme politik serta religius. 2 Konsep-konsep Kunci dari Anarkisme Epistemologis adalah: Kontra Induksi,Ketergantungan Observasi pada Teori, Ketergantungan Teori pada Bahasa,Prinsip Ketidaksepadanan, Apa Saja Boleh. Anarkisme Epistemologis PaulFeyerabend juga ternyata membawa Implikasi Filosofis dan Praktis: DemokrasiIlmiah, Demokrasi Sosial, bahkan sampai Reposisi Peran Ilmuwan terkait risetilmiah serta tanggung jawab sosial mereka. 3 Anarkisme EpistemologisFeyerabend juga, di samping memiliki para para penyokong, tidak luput daripihak-pihak yang memberi kritik dari pihak-pihak yang masih mempertahankanadanya nilai-nilai obyektivitas ilmu pengetahuan seperti yang disampaikan olehFrederick Suppe serta pihak-pihak yang masih mempertahankan adanyarasionalitas sains seperti Imre Lakatos, Stephen Toulmin, serta Dudley Saphere.

---

ABSTRACTproblems which taken in this research are 1 Definition ofEpistemology Anarchism by Paul Feyerabend and what is differentof the typeswith others anarchism. In the deconstruction framework of knowledge widely,what is the key of the concept from epistemology anarchism by PaulFeyerabend 2 How to implicate and practicethe philosophy from Anti Methodmovement with Epistemology Anarchism Credo 3 What are the types ofcriticism to Epistemology Anarchism by Feyerabend from the group who stillmaintains the values of the science object.In writing thesis, the writer has chosen the comparative research try tocompare two or more the philosopher or ideology. Those mean the vision aboutthe human being essence, world and God, the third working through is thesomething inherent, in discourses of science philosophy. Of course, in the varietyof the philosophers rsquo attitude about the third working through issues. To discuss amuch deeper about Feyerabend rsquo sthinking and the comparative through the criticfrom the philosopher to others, so it needs the literature research to try expressingthe contextual meaning in Hermeneutics method analytically, synthetically andcritically.The result of this research shows 1 the definition from EpistemologyAnarchism rsquo s Feyerabend is the configuration of deconstruction in scientificmethod and even can develop into his concepts about social democracy that rise tosolve the stagnation from the classic theory which had achieved to the criticsituation deeply. Feyerabend lsquo s theory is unequivocally critic to the positivism thatis very different between politic anarchism and religious. 2 The key of conceptfrom Epistemology Anarchism is Contra Induction, The Dependence Of TheObservation to The Theory, The Dependence Of The Theory To The Language,Incommensurability Principle, Anything Goes. Epistemology Anarchism rsquo s PaulFeyerabend brings philosophy implicating and practicing scientific democracy,social democracy or even to reposition of the scientists rsquo role play that concernsthe scientific research and their social responsible. 3 Epistemology Anarchism rsquo sfeyerabend also, besides he has the supporters, not rid of parties who gave criticthat still maintained the values of the science object who had conveyed byFrederick Suppe and the parties who still maintain of being rationality sciencesuchce as ImreLakatos, Stephen Toulmin, and Dudley Saphere."

"This textbook is designed for first-time students of politics. It provides an ideal introduction and survey to the key themes and issues central to the study of democratic politics today. The text is structured around three major parts: concepts, institutions and political behaviour; and ideologies and movements. Within each section a series of short and accessible chapters serve to both introduce the key ideas, institutional forms and ideological conflicts central to the study of democratic politics and provide a platform for further, in-depth studies. Each chapter contains a 'bullet-point' summary, a guide to further reading, and a set of questions for tutorial discussion. Designed and written for an undergraduate readership, Understanding Democratic Politics: An Introduction will become an essential guide and companion to all students of politics throughout their university degree."

"On the morning of September 29, 1920, a young poet died in Santiagos asylum, where he had recently been moved after nearly two months in police custody. Why and how did Jose Domingo Gómez Rojas end up in a prison, an asylum, and a cemetery? This book is an effort to answer that question. It is not a biography of Jose Domingo Gomez Rojas, although he figures prominently in its pages. It is, rather, a book about the context within which his arrest, imprisonment, and death unfolded and about the experiences of a number of the men he counted as friends and comrades. Covering a four-month period of 1920 in Santiago, it is a book about anarchists and aristocrats, students and teachers, poets and prosecutors, and cops and Wobblies. While narrative in form, the book has a number of analytical threads. It pays close attention to university students and the radicalization and disidentification they experienced over the course of the 1910s as well as the close relationships they forged with working people at the time. The book also stresses the importance of anarcho-communism in Chile in the first two decades of the twentieth century. The narrative is structured around the lives and labors of agitators and organizers who spent most, if not all, of their lives in Santiago and thus emphasizes the importance of place to radical politics. This is, in sum, a story of individuals and the collective struggles they waged, futures they imagined, and worlds they occupied."

"Konklusi logis dari kesempurnaan civil society di mana kesetaraan kebebasan berada pada akhirnya harus berakhir pada absurditas. Setiap individu tidak akan pernah setara dan hanya berakhir pada proses relasi antagonistik yang tidak akan pernah mencapai titik final. Relasi antagonistik ini tidak akan pernah usai, dikarenakan prinsip equal-liberty yang bersifat resiprokal harus berakhir dengan paradox. Individual liberty membahayakan equality, karena individual liberty dari setiap individu pada akhirnya akan selalu saling mendominasi dan menciptakan inequality. Begitu pula sebaliknya, equality akan membahayakan individual liberty, karena equality pada akhirnya harus merepresi individual liberty untuk selalu berada dalam keadaan equal. Inilah defisit demokrasi liberal, di mana usahanya untuk menyelesaikan relasi resiprokal yang paradox ini dengan menggunakan negara sebagai stabilizer pada akhirnya tidak akan pernah tercapai. Melalui konsepsi otonomi yang political dari post-anarkisme, akan dijelaskan bagaimana subjek dan relasi antagonistik di dalam dimensi political dapat diselamatkan dalam batasannya yang paling mungkin.

---

Logical conclusion from the perfection of civil society in which equal-liberty exists must eventually cease on absurdity. Each individual will never be equal and only ends up on the antagonistic relation process that will never reach final point. This antagonistic relation will never end, for the reciprocal equal-liberty principle must end in paradox. Individual liberty threatens equality because individual liberty from each individual will always dominate each other and therefore creates inequality. Conversely, equality will threaten individual liberty because eventually it has to repress individual liberty to be always in equal condition. This is the deficit of liberal democracy in which its effort to solve the paradoxical reciprocal relation using a state as stabilizer will never be reached. Through the conception of post-anarchism political autonomy, it will be explained about how subject and antagonistic relation within political dimension can be saved in its most possible limit."