Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Realizing a basic human right's court is not as easy writing or speaking, but it needs a concrete policy that is the commitment of a country to implement basic human rights in the social and political life as the realization of respect to the humanity of human beings. Indonesia is one of the countries which has clear commitment toward the protection of basic human rights as stated in the Preambule of The 1945 Constitution. Such as a commitment has been followed up by a concrete policy in the form of AdHoc Basic Human Right;s Court by the enactment of No. 26/2000 Law which was enacted in May 2002. Considering that Indonesia has not yet ratified the Statuta of International Criminal Court it is hoped that Human Right's Court in Indonesia would be able and willing to bring various cases of heavy violations toward basic human right's occuring in Indonesia nowadays to trial independently and impartialy. In other words The Basic Human Right's Court in Indonesia could convince the world that Indonesian Government is willing and able to settle heavy violations toward Basic Human Rights that so far have occured in Indonesia based on the standard of International Law."

"Indonesia merupakan salah satu negara dengan masyarakat yang pluralistik dengan beragam suku dan agama. Dalam kondisi keberagaman seperti ini, bisa saja terjadi interaksi social di antara kelompok-kelompok masyarakat yang berbeda yang kemudian berlanjut pada hubungan perkawinan. Seiring dengan berkembangnya masyarakat, permasalahan yang terjadi semakin kompleks. Berkaitan dengan perkawinan, belakangan ini sering tersiar terjadinya perkawinan antara pasangan yang memiliki keyakinan (agama) yang berbeda. Walaupun menurut Undang-undang Perkawinan, perkawinan beda agama bukanlah termasuk perkawinan campuran namun bukan tidak mungkin pada saat yang sama perkawinan campuran juga menyebabkan perkawinan beda agama. Hal ini disebabkan pasangan yang lintas negara juga pasangan lintas agama. Hal tersebut menimbulkan pro-kontra pendapat sehubungan dengan perkawinan beda agama. Salah satu pendapat mengatakan bahwa masalah agama merupakan masalah pribadi sendiri-sendiri, sehingga negara tidak perlu melakukan pengaturan yang memasukkan unsur-unsur agama, namun di pihak lain ada yang berpendapat bahwa perkawinan beda agama dilarang oleh agama sehingga tidak dapat diterima. Di dalam kehidupan berbangsa dan bernegara terjadi perubahan yang signifikan, terutama dalam hal penegakkan Hak-hak Asasi Manusia. Perkawinan merupakan hak asasi yang paling mendasar yang tidak bisa diintervensi oleh siapapun termasuk oleh negara. Adanya penolakan terhadap perkawinan beda agama di Indonesia pada dasarnya merupakan tindakan yang diskriminatif yang tidak sesuai dengan prinsip-prinsip Hak Asasi Manusia itu sendiri. Negara perlu segera melakukan penyempurnaan Undang-undang Perkawinan agar tidak terjadi kekosongan hukum dan menimbulkan adanya ketidakpastian hukum dalam hal perkawinan beda agama.

---

Indonesia represents one of the state which have a pluralistic society with different religions and tribes. In this heterogeneity condition, it is common for social interaction happening among different society groups that to be further continued in marriage relationship. Along with the development of the society, problems occurred are progressively complex. Due to marriage problems, mixed marriage between members of different religion is often happened in the society. Although according to Marriage of Law mixed marriage between members of different religion could not be categorized as a mixed marriage, it is possible for a mixed marriage to cause a mixed marriage between members of different religion. Transnational couple can be also a cross religion couple. Such problem generates pros and cons opinion referring to mixed marriage between members of different religion. One of the opinion said that religion problem is representing personal problem so that the state no need to regulate religion items in any kind of state of laws but at others there is an opinion that mixed married between members of different religion is prohibited and could not be accepted. Life as a nation and as a state shall bring a significant changes especially in the case of straightening of Basic Human Rights. Marriage represents most elementary basic rights which do not deflect intervention by whoever including by the state. Denial of the existence of a mixed marriage between members of different religion in Indonesia basically represents a discriminatory action that is contradictive with the principles of Human right itself. The state needs immediately to improve its Marriage of Law in order to complete the blankness of law that will generate a legal uncertainty in the case of a mixed marriage between members of different religion."