Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Latar Belakang: Saat ini, material restoratif bioaktif Giomer, komposit resin alkasit, dan semen ionomer kaca modifikasi resin (SIKMR) telah digunakan dalam praktik kedokteran gigi. Dalam rongga mulut, material restoratif bioaktif akan menahan gaya dari pengunyahan dan menghadapi perubahan pH. Oleh karena itu, dilakukan penelitian mengenai pengaruh pH saliva buatan terhadap kuat tekan material restoratif bioaktif. Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan nilai kuat tekan lima material restoratif bioaktif setelah perendaman dalam saliva buatan dengan pH 7 dan 4,5. Metode: Lima kelompok material digunakan dalam penelitian ini: Giomer Beautifil II LS, Zirconomer Improved, Cention N, Activa Bioactive Restorative, dan Fuji II LC Capsule. Dua belas spesimen berbentuk silinder dengan diameter 4 mm dan tinggi 6 mm dari tiap material dibagi menjadi dua kelompok perlakuan, yaitu perendaman dalam saliva buatan pH 7 dan 4,5 selama 7 hari. Spesimen diuji menggunakan Universal Testing Machine (Shimadzu AGS-X 5kN, Japan) dengan crosshead speed 0,5 mm/menit. Hasil: Hasil uji statistik menunjukkan hanya Activa Bioactive Restorative yang memiliki nilai kuat tekan setelah perendaman dalam saliva buatan pH 4,5 lebih rendah secara bermakna dari pH 7. Kesimpulan: Nilai kuat tekan material restoratif bioaktif Giomer, komposit resin alkasit, dan SIKMR secara umum tidak lebih rendah dalam saliva buatan pH 4,5 dibanding dengan pH 7.

---

Background: Currently, bioactive restorative materials of Giomer, alkasite composite resin, and resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) are being used in dental practice. In the oral cavity, bioactive restorative materials will resist the load from mastication and face changes in pH. Therefore, a study on the effect of pH of artificial saliva on the compressive strength of bioactive restorative materials was conducted. Objective: This study aims to determine the differences in the compressive strength of five bioactive restorative materials after immersion in artificial saliva with a pH of 7 and 4.5. Methods: Five groups of materials were used in this study: Giomer Beautifil II LS, Zirconomer Improved, Cention N, Activa Bioactive Restorative, and Fuji II LC Capsule. Twelve cylindrical specimens with a diameter of 4 mm and a height of 6 mm of each material were divided into two groups, namely immersion in artificial saliva with a pH of 7 and 4.5 for 7 days. The specimens were tested using a Universal Testing Machine (Shimadzu AGS-X 5kN, Japan) with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute. Result:. Statistical tests showed that only Activa Bioactive Restorative had a compressive strength value after immersion in artificial saliva with a pH of 4.5 was significantly lower than pH of 7. Conclusion: The compressive strength values of bioactive restorative materials of Giomer, alkasite composite resin, and RMGIC were generally not lower in artificial saliva with a pH of 4.5 than in pH of 7."

"Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbandingan pengaruh saliva buatan dengan pH 4,5 terhadap kekerasan dari material restoratif bioaktif. Metode penelitian: Dalam penelitian ini dilakukan penelitian menggunakan material restorative bioaktif, Activa Bioactive (RMGI), Cention-N (RK Alkasit), Fuji II LC (RMGIC), Zirconomer (Zirconia reinforced Glass Ionomer) , dan Beautifill II LS (Giomer). Masing-masing specimen material tersebut dengan ukuran diameter 15 mm dengan tinggi 1 mm direndam dalam saliva buatan pH 4,5 selama 7 hari. Setelah 7 hari, specimen dilakukan uji kekerasan menggunakan Knoop Hardness test dengan 5 jejas per spesimen. Kemudian hasil pengujian dilakukan uji normalitas Shapiro-Wilk, dilanjutkan dengan One-Way Anova. Lalu dilakukan uji homogenitas Levene dan dilanjutkan uji Post-hoc Tamhane. Hasil: Terdapat perbedaan bermakna pada nilai kekerasan di antara material restoratif bioaktif yang diuji (One way anova, p<0,05). Dengan nilai tertinggi pada material Cention-N dan terendah material Activa Bioactive. Pada uji Post-hoc Tamhane didapati perbedaan bermakna, kecuali antara Beautifill II LS dengan Zirconomer. Kesimpulan: Setelah dilakukan perendaman pada saliva dengan pH 4,5, material Cention N memiliki nilai kekerasan tertinggi dan Material Activa yang terendah.

---

Objective: This study aims to compare the effect of artificial saliva with pH 4.5 on the microhardness of bioactive restorative materials. Method: In this study, research was carried out using restorative bioactive materials, Activa Bioactive (RMGI), Cention N (RK Alkasit), Fuji II LC (RMGIC), Zirconomer (Zirconia reinforced Glass Ionomer), and Beautifill II LS (Giomer). Each specimen of the materials are made with a diameter of 15 mm and a height of 1 mm, and were immersed in artificial saliva pH 4.5 for 7 days. After 7 days the material was subjected to a microhardness tester using the Knoop Hardness test with 5 per specimen of materials. Statistic analysis were performed using Shapiro-Wilk normality test, followed by One-Way Anova. Then the Levene homogeneity test was carried out and continued with the Post-hoc Tamhane test. Result: There was a significant difference in the hardness value between bioactive restorative materials (One way ANOVA, p <0.05). With the highest value for the Cention-N material and the lowest for Activa Bioactive material. In the Post-hoc Tamhane test, there was a significant difference, except between Beautifill II LS and Zirconomer. Conclusion: After soaking in saliva with a pH of 4.5, the Cention N material had the highest hardness value and the lowest Activa Material."