Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[Bioethics developed as an academic and clinical discipline during the later part of the 20th century due to a variety of factors. Crucial to this development was the increased secularization of American culture as well as the dissolution of medicine as a quasi-guild with its own professional ethics. In the context of this moral vacuum, bioethics came into existence. Its raison d’être was opposition to the alleged paternalism of the medical community and traditional moral frameworks, yet at the same time it set itself up as a source of moral authority with respect to biomedical decision making. Bioethics serves as biopolitics in so far as it attempts to make determinations about how individuals ought to make medical decisions and then attempts to codify that in law. Progressivism and secularism are ultimately the ideology of bioethics.;Bioethics developed as an academic and clinical discipline during the later part of the 20th century due to a variety of factors. Crucial to this development was the increased secularization of American culture as well as the dissolution of medicine as a quasi-guild with its own professional ethics. In the context of this moral vacuum, bioethics came into existence. Its raison d’être was opposition to the alleged paternalism of the medical community and traditional moral frameworks, yet at the same time it set itself up as a source of moral authority with respect to biomedical decision making. Bioethics serves as biopolitics in so far as it attempts to make determinations about how individuals ought to make medical decisions and then attempts to codify that in law. Progressivism and secularism are ultimately the ideology of bioethics., Bioethics developed as an academic and clinical discipline during the later part of the 20th century due to a variety of factors. Crucial to this development was the increased secularization of American culture as well as the dissolution of medicine as a quasi-guild with its own professional ethics. In the context of this moral vacuum, bioethics came into existence. Its raison d’être was opposition to the alleged paternalism of the medical community and traditional moral frameworks, yet at the same time it set itself up as a source of moral authority with respect to biomedical decision making. Bioethics serves as biopolitics in so far as it attempts to make determinations about how individuals ought to make medical decisions and then attempts to codify that in law. Progressivism and secularism are ultimately the ideology of bioethics.]"

"ABSTRACTPada masa modern ini, penderitaan berat yang dirasakan pasien sebagai akibat dari penyakit yang sulit atau bahkan sudah tidak dapat disembuhkan masih menjadi suatu permasalahan dalam dunia kedokteran. Penderitaan yang berat tersebut mungkin akan lepas apabila kematian datang. Hal ini berkaitan dengan euthanasia yang bertentangan dengan Sumpah Dokter, Etika, maupun Hukum. Walaupun pada praktiknya, euthanasia sudah kerap dilakukan di Indonesia dengan melakukan penghentian terapi bantuan hidup terhadap pasien terminal yang merupakan bentuk euthanasia pasif. Untuk menghadapi permasalahan tersebut, muncul sebuah studi untuk menangani kontroversi etik yang disebut bioetika kedokteran dan diatur di dalam Kode Etik Kedokteran Indonesia (KODEKI). Hukum di Indonesia menyatakan bahwa euthanasia merupakan suatu yang dilarang dan dapat dipidanakan, namun terjadi ketidaksesuaian regulasi antara satu dengan lainnya karena pada nyatanya penghentian terapi bantuan hidup terhadap pasien terminal diatur di dalam Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 37 tahun 2014 tentang Penghentian Kematian dan Pemanfaatan Organ Donor. Dalam menganalisis permasalahan tersebut, skripsi ini diteliti dengan metode yuridis-normatif serta menggunakan tipologi penelitian deskriptif. Adapun hasil analisa yang disimpulkan oleh penulis yakni penghentian terapi bantuan hidup terhadap pasien terminal diperbolehkan berdasarkan bioetika kedokteran dan hukum di Indonesia. Selanjutnya, saran yang penulis berikan, yakni: kepada Ikatan Dokter Indonesia agar menjelaskan bentuk euthanasia apakah yang sebenarnya dilarang, kepada Pemerintah khususnya tim revisi KUHP agar mengubah definisi euthanasia karena sudah tidak relevan dengan keadaan sekarang, dan kepada Media Massa agar lebih bijak dalam memberikan informasi dengan melakukan riset terlebih dahulu mengenai topik artikel yang akan diberitakan supaya tidak terjadi kesalahan dalam memberikan informasi.

---

ABSTRACTIn modern era, the severe suffering felt by patients as a result of difficult or even incurable diseases is still a problem in the medical world. Severe suffering may be released when death comes. This is related to euthanasia which is contrary to the Doctors Oath, Ethics, and Law. Although in practice, euthanasia has often been carried out in Indonesia by stopping life assistance therapy for terminal patients which is a form of passive euthanasia. To deal with these problems, a study emerged to address the ethical controversy called medical bioethics and regulated in the Indonesian Medical Ethics Code (KODEKI). Indonesian Law states that euthanasia is prohibited and can be criminalized, but there is a discrepancy between one another regulations because in reality the termination of life assistance therapy for terminal patients is regulated in the Minister of Health Regulation No. 37 of 2014 concerning the Cessation of Death and Use of Donor Organs. In analyzing these problems, this thesis was examined by juridical-normative method and used descriptive research typology. The results of the analysis concluded by the authors is the termination of life assistance therapy for terminal patients is permissible based on medical bioethics and law in Indonesia. Furthermore, the suggestion that the author gives are: to the Indonesian Doctors Association to explain the form of euthanasia is actually prohibited, to the Government especially the Criminal Code revision team to change the definition of euthanasia because it is not relevant to the present situation, and to Mass Media to be more informed by doing research first on the topic of the article that will be reported so that there is no error in providing information."

"Biobanks are promising instruments of biomedical research and of transnational medicine in particular. Ethical, legal and social issues associated with biobanking, however, have recently led to a more critical view on this concept. All efforts addressing these concerns have been grounded on well-established standards of biomedical ethics such as informed consent procedures, protection of individual autonomy, benefit sharing etc. By additionally highlighting the widely neglected aspect of trust, this book aims at broadening the horizon of the ELSI-debate and thus filling a gap in current research on biobanking. "