Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
The global increase in cross-border transactions has led to a rising trend in international disputes. International arbitration has become the preferred dispute resolution method, as companies and individuals increasingly favour a neutral international tribunal over foreign domestic courts. This new book provides a practical guide to international arbitration. Written by leading experts Stuart Dutson, Andy Moody, and Neil Newing from Eversheds, this title explains the stages of the arbitration process in a straight-forward manner and from a practitioner's perspective. The authors provide guidance on drafting the arbitration agreement, commencing arbitration, selecting the arbitral tribunal, drafting pleadings and witness evidence, liaising with the tribunal throughout the arbitral process and enforcing the final award. Numerous tips, examples and precedents are included to help the new practitioner or interested student understand each stage of the arbitration proceedings

Abstrak :

---

ABSTRACT
In this study, Caroline Henckels examines how investment tribunals have balanced the competing interests of host states and foreign investors in determining state liability in disputes concerning the exercise of public power. Analyzing the concepts of proportionality and deference in investment tribunals' decision-making in comparative perspective, the book proposes a new methodology for investment tribunals to adopt in regulatory disputes, which combines proportionality analysis with an institutionally sensitive approach to the standard of review. Henckels argues that adopting a modified form of proportionality analysis would provide a means for tribunals to decide cases in a more consistent and coherent manner leading to greater certainty for both states and investors, and that affording due deference to host states in the determination of liability would address the concern that the decisions of investment tribunals unjustifiably impact on the regulatory autonomy of states.

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Pada tanggal 5 Agustus 1981 melalui Keputusan Presiden No. 34 Tahun 1981, Konvensi New York 1958 telah dinyatakan berlaku untuk Indonesia, hal mana berarti bahwa putusan arbitrase yang diucapkan di luar negeri dapat dinyatakan berlaku dalam wilayah Republik Indonesia, dalam usaha untuk mengatasi azas territorialitas yang melarang berlakunya putusan asing, satu dan lain dalam usaha Pemerintah RI untuk menarik lebih banyak penanam modal asing ke Indonesia, berhubung kini putusan arbitrase asing yang sifatnya comdemnatoir dapat dieksekusi oleh pedagang asing terhadap asset debitur dalam wilayah RI yang akan menambah kepercayaan dunia luar terhadap pedagang Indonesia, hal mana menegaskan masih berlakunya Konvensi Geneve 1927 dari zaman Penjajahan, yang mengatur hal yang sama, akan tetapi Konvensi New York 1958 ini dinyatakan berlaku dengan pembatasan tertentu antara lain dengan memperhatikan azas resiprositas, terbatas pada sengketa komersial, tidak bertentangan dengan ketertiban umum, pembatasan mana telah diatur dengan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung No. 1 Tahun 1990 tentang Tatacara Pelaksanaan Keputusan Arbitrase Asing, Konvensi mana juga mengakui kebebasan para pihak untuk melakukan choice of law dan choice of forum baik melalui arbitrase institutional maupun ad hoc, dalam hubungan mana perlu diperhatikan bahwa menurut ketentuan yang mengatur arbitrase di Indonesia putusan arbitrase tidak saja didasarkan pada pertimbangan hukum, akan tetapi dengan persetujuan para pihak para arbiter dapat memberikan putusan ex aequo et bona juga bahwa putusan yang diperoleh akan mempunyai kekuatan hukum yang pasti dan tetap, menghindarkan pemeriksaan dalam tingkat lanjutan, dengan demikian mempercepat waktu penyelesaian sengketa yang diidamkan oleh semua pencari keadilan, khususnya para pedagang, yang sangat berkepentingan agar supaya sengketa yang timbul dapat segera tuntas dalam waktu yang singkat.

Abstrak :
With a focus on how trade, foreign investment, commercial arbitration and financial regulation rules affect impoverished individuals, Poverty and the International Economic Legal System examines the relationship between the legal rules of the international economic law system and states' obligations to reduce poverty. The contributors include leading practitioners, practice-oriented scholars and legal theorists, who discuss the human aspects of global economic activity without resorting to either overly dogmatic human rights approaches or technocratic economic views. The essays extend beyond development discussions by encouraging further efforts to study, improve and develop legal mechanisms for the benefit of the world's poor and challenging traditionally de-personified legal areas to engage with their real-world impacts.

Abstrak :
This is the first comprehensive study of corruption in international investment arbitration. The book considers the limited effectiveness of efforts to combat transnational corruption in international law and the emergence of international investment arbitration as a singular means foreffective control of corruption within the international legal order. The case law on corruption by investment tribunals is studied exhaustively, jurisprudential trends are identified, and reforms aimed at enhancing the effectiveness and fairness of investment arbitration as a mechanism to combatcorruption are proposed. Divided into three parts, part I focus on the phenomenon of corruption in foreign investment and attempts at its control through international law. Part II analyses the available case law in international investment arbitration dealing with corruption. Llamzon identifies nine distinct trendsemerging from the case law and provides a table summarizing the key areas of corruption decision-making and each relevant tribunal's approach, which is an invaluable tool for practitioners engaging in "live" issues of corruption within arbitral proceedings. Part III reflects on the implications ofthese trends for both the "supply" and "demand" sides of corruption in international law, and proposes a integrative framework of decision for corruption issues in international investment arbitration.

Abstrak :
This article explores the main features of exceptions to enforcement under Article V of the NYC, including its exhaustive and discretionary natures. It then specifically provides an overview of narrow judicial control over the grounds for refusing enforcement under the Article V of the NYC. It points out the fundamental principles of the provision in determining the enforceability of international arbitral awards. Then this article will occasionally refer to international arbitral cases in some jurisdictions, such as the United States, France and Switzerland. It is noted that courts and legislatures in those jurisdictions have moved towards pro-enforcement policy to questions of recognition and enforcement arising under Article V of the NYC. Therefore, this approach is a good signal and a promising development to promote the finality and enforeability of foreign arbitral awards in international commercial arbitration. This approach can also be a good lesson for the Indonesian judiciary system in relation to the enforcement and recognition of international arbitral awards in the future.

Artikel ini menganalisis tentang alasan-alasan penolakan pengakuan dan pelaksanaan putusan arbitrase internasional yang diatur di dalam Pasal V Konvensi New York 1958, termasuk sifat limitatif dan diskresi dari ketentuan tersebut. Beberapa putusan pengadilan di berbagai negara seperti Amerika Serikat dan Perancis menunjukkan adanya tendensi untuk menerapkan ketentuan Pasal V Konvensi New York secara restriktif. Fenomena ini mencerminkan adanya kecenderungan dari berbagai negara untuk menerapkan prinsip ‘pro enforcement’ terhadap pelaksanaan putusan arbitrase internasional sehingga lebih memberikan jaminan kepastian hukum terhadap pengakuan/pelaksanaan putusan arbitrase internasional di berbagai negara yang telah meratifikasi Konvensi New York. Penerapan prinsip ‘pro enforcement’ juga dapat memberikan paradigma baru bagi Pengadilan di Indonesia terkait dengan pengakuan dan pelaksanaan putusan arbitrase internasional.