Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Rapid Transit System merupakan angkutan umum jenis baru yang memiliki waktu terjadwal dan lajur khusus sehingga memiliki waktu lebih efisien dibandingkan angkutan umum jenis lainnya. Ini juga berarti bahwa waktu perjalanan lebih cepat daripada yang lain. Saat ini, sebagian besar komuter dari Bekasi menggunakan transportasi pribadi, karena kepraktisan dan waktu tempuh yang lebih cepat dibandingkan dengan transportasi umum konvensional. Maka untuk melihat pengaruh waktu tempuh sistem rapid transit, waktu tempuh BRT dan LRT dibandingkan berdasarkan rute yang dipilih dari Summarecon Bekasi (Bekasi) ke Kawasan Dukuh Atas (Jakarta) dan rute yang sama untuk perjalanan yang dimulai dari Jakarta. Data tersebut kemudian dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan formulir survei dan alat pendukung. Setelah dilakukan pendataan maka dapat dihitung waktu tempuhnya sehingga diperoleh waktu tempuh BRT 71,49% lebih lama untuk rute Bekasi-Jakarta dan 56,27% lebih lama untuk rute Jakarta-Bekasi. Untuk kecepatan, Bekasi ke Jakarta lebih lambat 56,52%. Sedangkan untuk waktu tempuh LRT 32,25% lebih lama untuk rute Bekasi ke Jakarta dan 11,62% lebih lama untuk rute Bekasi ke Jakarta, kedua aspek tersebut dibandingkan dengan transportasi pribadi. Berdasarkan hipotesis statistik menggunakan analisis varians (ANOVA ), waktu tempuh sistem rapid transit tidak semuanya sama dengan nilai F perbandingan untuk BRT adalah 45,56 > 3,46 dan nilai F perbandingan untuk LRT adalah 58,807 > 5,32. Oleh karena itu, hipotesis alternatif terbukti, pengguna transportasi pribadi mana yang mungkin tidak mendukung penggunaan sistem angkutan cepat.

---

Rapid Transit System is a new type of public transportation where it has a scheduled time and a dedicated lane for it, making it more time efficient than other types of public transportation. This also means that the travel time is faster than others. Currently, most commuters from Bekasi are using private transportation, due to practicality and faster travel time compared to conventional public transportation. Hence to see the travel time impact by the rapid transit system, the travel time of BRT and LRT are compared based on the chosen route from Summarecon Bekasi (Bekasi) to Dukuh Atas Area (Jakarta) and the same route for the trip that started from Jakarta. The data than being collected using a survey form and supporting tools. After the data collection, the travel time can be calculated, resulting the BRT travel time is 71,49% longer for Bekasi to Jakarta route and 56,27% longer for Jakarta to Bekasi route. For the speed, it is 56,52% slower for Bekasi to Jakarta. Meanwhile, for the LRT travel time is 32,25% longer for Bekasi to Jakarta route and 11,62% longer for Bekasi to Jakarta route, both aspects is being compared with private transportation.Based on the statistical hypothesis using analysis of variance (ANOVA), the rapid transit system travel time are not all equal with the F value comparison for BRT is 45,56 > 3,46 and F value commparison for LRT is 58,807 > 5,32. Hence, the alternative hypothesis is proven, which private transportation user might not in favor of using the rapid transit system."

"Mobilitas komuter yang lazim dilakukan pekerja Jabodetabek dapat memberikan masalah pada kesejahteraan subjektif. Namun, terdapat inkonsistensi terkait dampak mobilitas komuter terhadap kesejahteraan subjektif pada pekerja. Selain itu, belum banyak studi yang mempelajari pengaruh mobilitas komuter, seperti waktu tempuh dan persepsi stres terhadap kesejahteraan subjektif pada populasi pekerja di Jabodetabek. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui pengaruh waktu tempuh komuter, persepsi stres umum, dan persepsi stres komuter terhadap kesejahteraan subjektif pekerja di Jabodetabek. Penelitian melibatkan 114 pekerja berusia 25-49 tahun (M=30.57, SD=7.475) dan melakukan mobilitas komuter setiap hari. Mayoritas partisipan adalah perempuan yaitu sebanyak 59,6%. Rata-rata waktu tempuh komuter partisipan adalah 72,80 menit per hari. Alat ukur yang digunakan adalah The PERMA-profiler dan Perceived Stress Scale. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa waktu tempuh komuter, persepsi stres umum, dan persepsi stres komuter secara bersama-sama tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap kesejahteraan subjektif. Hanya persepsi stres umum yang berpengaruh secara signifikan terhadap kesejahteraan subjektif pekerja di Jabodetabek. Temuan ini menekankan perlunya upaya penurunan persepsi stres oleh pekerja maupun perusahaan untuk meningkatkan kesejahteraan subjektif.

---

The commuter mobility prevalent among Jabodetabek workers can cause problems with subjective well-being. However, there are inconsistencies regarding the impact of commuter mobility on subjective well-being in workers. In addition, not many studies have studied the effect of commuter mobility, such as commuting time and perceived stress on subjective well-being in the working population in Jabodetabek. Therefore, this study aims to determine the effect of commuting time, perceived general stress, and perceived commuter stress on the subjective well-being of workers in Jabodetabek. The study involved 114 workers aged 25-49 years (M=30.57, SD=7.475) and commuting daily. The majority of participants were female, 59.6%. The average commuting time of participants was 72,80 minutes per day. The measurement tools used were The PERMA-profiler and Perceived Stress Scale. The results showed that commuting time, perceived general stress, and perceived commuter stress together did not have a significant influence on subjective well-being. Only general stress perception has a significant effect on the subjective well-being of workers in Jabodetabek. These findings emphasize the need for efforts to reduce stress perceptions by workers and companies to improve subjective well-being."

"Based on observations and in-depth interviews, Border Lives tells the story of how diverse groups of individuals came to establish roots in Tijuana, beginning shortly after the termination of the Bracero Program (1942-64) and ending in the present. It describes how these different groups of migrants and residents adapt to a dynamic borderlands economy and draw on the border as a resource to construct their livelihoods. The book details the consequences of border-enforcement and immigration restrictions over several decades, documenting the ways in which policies create precarious situations for those who cross the border and come in contact with them on a regular basis. The book shows how individuals have used the border as a resource in the past, and how current residents are forced to seek ways to access the opportunities that the border offers in the future. Yet for all of these border crossers-former, current, and future-the border itself figures significantly, not only in their livelihood strategy but also in their lifestyle, shaping their knowledge, action, and their relationships, controlling their time, and allowing them to convert US wages into a Mexican standard of living, without losing the social and cultural comforts of Tijuana-as-home."