Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK

Sebelum adanya internet dan mesin pencari (search engine), tampaknya kita menikmati keadaan perlindungan atas kerahasiaan pribadi. Foto-foto dan kenangan-kenangan hanyalah sebuah konsumsi domestik. Walaupun dapat diungkapkan kepada publik, tetap membutuhkan waktu dan biaya yang besar bagi seorang researches untuk mencari dan menyatukan seluruh informasinya. Berjalanlah waktu, dan keseluruhan tugas itu menjadi semakin mudah, lebih cepat dan tidak membutuhkan waktu dan biaya yang berlebih dan, gratis. Dengan mengonsumsi begitu banyaknya jumlah informasi yang tidak pernah terpikirkan sebelumnya, para pengguna internet kini menjadi semakin terbuka untuk menjadi subjek profil dan dilakukannya modifikasi-modifikasi atas informasi dirinya sendiri. Sejauh manakah hubungan antara privasi dengan data pribadi dalam kebebasan arus data maupun informasi, bentuk pelanggaran-pelanggaran atas privasi terhadap data pribadi, dan bagaimanakah hukum positif di Indonesia sepatutnya melindungi privasi setiap individu merupakan permasalahan yang penting untuk dijawab. Penyusunan Tesis ini menggunakan metode normatif, dengan langkah-langkah studi kepustakaan yang menelaah data-data berupa bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan bahan lainnya. Tesis ini ingin menunjukan bahwa dalam praktek di masyarakat, privasi adalah benar-benar ada, benda nyata yang melekat dalam diri setiap individu, walaupun privasi itu tidak berwujud, dan akhirnya, harus dapat disimpulkan bahwa privasi haruslah menjadi sebuah pembebas dalam hubungan antar manusia.

---

ABSTRACT

---

Before the internet and search engine, it seems we enjoy a state of protection of privacy. Photos and memories were domestic consumption. Although it can be disclosed to the public, it still requires a lot of time and money researcher to found and unite them. There was time lapsed and the whole task becomes easier, faster, and does not require extra time and, free. Consuming more and more information which that had never thought before, internet users are now becoming a subject of privacy and making modifications to their information its self. What is the relationship between privacy and personal data in freedom of data flow or information, form of violations of privacy and personal data, and how law in Indonesia should protect privacy of all individual persona is important problems to answer. This Thesis wants to show in practice privacy is really there, an avatar object that are attached to every individual even though they are not tangible, and finally shall be concluded that privacy must be a barrier in human relationships.

Abstrak :
Records Managers have tended to find themselves given the responsibility for managing requests under the Freedom of Information (FOI) and Data Protection Acts (DPA), without necessarily having training and/or an academic background in legal studies. This book aims to fill this knowledge gap

Abstrak :
This book could save your organisation many thousands or even millions of euros (or dollars) and the damage to your organisation?s reputation and to the trust of employees, customers or citizens if it suffers a data breach that could have been avoided if only it had performed a privacy impact assessment before deploying a new technology, product, service or other initiative involving personal data.

Abstrak :
In the emerging era of information and technology, the importance of privacy and data protection is growing ever since. However, despite such common concern from the society, there is some confusion about the mechanisms of differentiation and scope of discussion about privacy with the protection of personal data and even impressed blended with issues of spamming issues. With comparison to Europe and the US legal perspectives, Therefore, this paper tries to discuss such problem in accordance to the perspective of laws to the communication itself.

Abstrak :
EU data protection law imposes a series of requirements designed to protect individuals against the risks that result from the processing of their data. It also distinguishes among different types of actors involved in the processing, setting out different obligations for each actor. The most important distinction in this regard is the distinction between "controllers" and "processors". Together, these concepts provide the very basis upon which responsibility for compliance with EU data protection law is allocated. As a result, both concepts play a decisive role in determining the potential liability of an organisation under EU data protection law, including the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Technological and societal developments have made it increasingly difficult to apply the controller-processor model in practice. The main factors are the growing complexity of processing operations, the diversification of processing, services and the sheer number of actors that can be involved. Against this background, this book seeks to determine whether EU data protection law should continue to maintain the controller-processor model as the main basis for allocating responsibility and liability. This book provides its readers with the analytical framework to help them navigate the intricate relationship of roles, responsibility and liability under EU data protection law. The book begins with an in-depth analysis of the nature and role of the controller and processor concepts. The key elements of each are examined in detail, as is the associated allocation of responsibility and liability. The next part contains a historical-comparative analysis, which traces the origin and development of the controller-processor model over time. To identify the main problems that occur when applying the controller-processor model in practice, a number of real-life use cases are examined (cloud computing, social media, identity management and search engines). In the final part, a critical evaluation is made of the choices made by the European legislature in the context of the GDPR. It is clear that the GDPR has introduced considerable improvements in comparison to EU Directive 95/46. In the long run, however, further changes may well be necessary. By way of conclusion, a number of avenues for possible improvements are presented. Dr Brendan Van Alsenoy is a Legal Advisor at the Belgian Data Protection Authority and a senior affiliated researcher at the KU Leuven Centre for IT & IP Law, and co-editor of Privacy & Persoonsgegevens. He has previously worked as a legal researcher at the KU Leuven Centre for IT & IP Law, with a focus on data protection and privacy, intermediary liability and trust services. In 2012, he worked at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to assist in the revision of the 1980 OECD Privacy Guidelines.