Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKTesis ini membahas perbandingan penyelesaian sengketa antara nasabah dengan bank melalui mediasi perbankan dengan penyelesaian sengketa melalui mediasi di pengadilan. Adanya sengketa antara nasabah dengan bank tidak harus diselesaikan melalui pengadilan melainkan dapat diselesaikan melalui suatu mediasi perbankan yang diajukan oleh salah satu pihak (Bank atau Nasabah). Dalam mediasi perbankan, Bank Indonesia bertindak sebagai penengah. Mediasi perbankan dapat mempermudah dan mempersingkat waktu dalam suatu penyelesaian sengketa perbankan antara nasabah dan bank karena pengajuannya tidak melalui prosedur gugatan seperti prosedur mediasi di pengadilan yang cenderung rumit dan memakan waktu yang lama Hasil dari mediasi perbankan merupakan kesepakatan bersama para pihak yang mempunyai kekuatan mengikat. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode normatif. Hasil penelitian menyarankan agar jika terjadi sengketa antara nasabah dan bank, mediasi perbankan merupakan pilihan yang efektif karena selain mempersingkat waktu juga hasil mediasi dapat dilaksanakan oleh kedua belah pihak.

---

ABSTRACTThe focus of this study is a comparison between the customer dispute resolution through mediation with the bank with the banking dispute resolution through mediation in the courts. The existence of disputes between customers and banks do not have to be settled through the courts but can be resolved through a mediation banks filed by one party (the Bank or the Customer). In mediation banking, Bank Indonesia acting as a mediator. Mediation can facilitate banking and shorten the time in a banking dispute resolution between the customer and the bank because the request was not in a procedure such as a lawsuit in court mediation procedures which tend to complex and time consuming results of banking mediation is an agreement with the parties that have binding force. This research using normative methods. The results suggest that in the event of disputes between customers and banks, banking mediation is an effective option because in addition to shortening the results of mediation can be implemented by both parties."

"Complete and broad in coverage, this book addresses negotiations and dispute resolution in a wide variety of settings. Because skill development is an important part of becoming a masterful negotiator, concepts are augmented with numerous exercises, activities, role plays, and self-assessments. By combining theoretical foundations with experiential exercises, the book helps students develop their ability to negotiate and resolve conflicts in both personal and professional settings"

"ABSTRAKTax dispute resolution in Indonesia has not yet met the principles of quick, simple, and economical. Taxpayers have to wait more than 3 years for the lawful certainty. This paper elaborates the potential strategy in resolving the tax dispute in Indonesia through administrative law. OECD has suggested taxpayers and revenue body to build positive connection through the changing of confrontation to the collaborative relationship. Mediation is a solution to encourage this positive bond in solving the dispute. It is successfully implemented in Australia. The similar way is strongly recommended for the Indonesian Government to develop a good relationship between taxpayers and revenue body. One of the chances for mediating in an attempt to minimize tax dispute is in the auditing process. This process cannot be easily done because it needs political will and high desired improvement from the Government to make a change. Mediation is an attempt to achieve a win-win solution and is in line with the principles of Pancasila, that is a deliberation for reaching an agreement. If it is done, then mediation will be a courteous way in tax dispute resolution and will be able to improve a good post-dispute relationship in Indonesia."