Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKPendekatan integrasi antara terapi paliatif dan perawatan penyakit kronik dan atau mengancam jiwa telah banyak digunakan dalam beberapa tahun terakhir. Hingga saat ini, masih banyak yang beranggapan bahwa terapi paliatif hanya ditujukan untuk pasien dengan penyakit berat yang sudah berada di stadium terminal atau akhir hidupnya, namun pada kenyataannya banyak pasien mendapatkan manfaat dari terapi paliatif sedini mungkin. Penelitian ini merupakan uji klinis acak terkontrol yang bertujuan untuk mengetahui manfaat integrasi terapi paliatif pada pasien anak dengan penyakit keganasan. Pasien terdiri dari anak dengan penyakit keganasan usia 2-18 tahun yang dikonsulkan kepada tim paliatif. Pasien dibagi menjadi dua kelompok secara acak, yakni kelompok kontrol (30 anak) dan kelompok intervensi (30 anak). Intervensi berupa kunjungan rumah, komunikasi dua arah antara tenaga terlatih dengan pasien dan orang tua, dibagi menjadi 6 sesi (1 sesi setiap 2 minggu) yang berfokus pada edukasi penyelesaian masalah, manajemen gejala, perawatan diri sendiri, komunikasi, pembuatan keputusan dan pendampingan rencana perawatan lanjutan. Pasien diikuti dan dilakukan penilaian kualitas hidup dengan kuesioner Pediatric Quality of Life Innitiative (PedsQLTM) modul kanker 3.0, intensitas gejala dinilai dengan Edmonton Symptoms Assesment Score (ESAS), frekuensi kunjungan unit gawat darurat (UGD) pasien anak dengan penyakit keganasan dicatat selama periode penelitian dan dibandingkan dengan sebelum penelitian. Kelompok intervensi memiliki kualitas hidup lebih tinggi bermakna (81,63) dibandingkan kelompok kontrol (62,39), p<0,001. Ranah kualitas hidup yang paling meningkat secara signifikan adalah ranah nyeri, mual, kecemasan prosedur, kecemasan tata laksana, dan khawatir. Intervensi paliatif dapat menurunkan intensitas gangguan tidur (p=0,003) dan anoreksia pada pasien (p<0,001). Intervensi paliatif dapat menurunkan kunjungan UGD sebanyak 4,77 kali pada pasien anak dengan penyakit keganasan (OR 4,77, 95% IK 1,29-17,65; p=0,018).

---

ABSTRACTIn these last few years, an integrated approach between palliative care and chronic and/or life-threatening conditions care have been widely used. Many people think that palliative care is only intended for those with end stage of disease or in the end of life period. In fact, many patients had benefit from early palliative integration. This study is aimed to know the role of palliative intervention in child with malignancy. A randomized controlled trial comparing patients who were given palliative care (a 3-month home visit) and those who were not (intervention vs control group) was conducted, each group containing 30 patients. Patients consisted of children with cancer aged 2-18 years old who were consulted to palliative team. A two-way communication between a trained health worker and patients with or without their parents were conducted as the intervention (report by proxy or self-report). Interventions were given in 6 sessions (1 session every 2 weeks) focusing on problems solving education, symptoms management, self-care, communication, decision making, and long-term care plan assistance. In the first and twelfth week of the intervention, all patients were assessed with the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQLTM) questionnaire cancer module 3.0. Symptomps intensity were assessed by Edmonton Symptoms Assesment Score (ESAS). Emergency room admissions from the last 3 months were noted before patients were enrolled in the study. During the follow up period, ER admissions were recorded further. Data was analyzed using bivariate analysis, OR calculations were performed to see the effect of interventions on outcomes in this study. A significant difference of quality of life was found between the two groups with average total score in control group 62.39 and intervention group 81.63 (p<0.001). Most significant increased domains were pain, nausea, procedural anxiety, treatment anxiety, and worry. Intensity of sleep disturbance (p=0.003) and anorexia (p<0.001) were decreased significantly in intervention group. Emergency room admissions were reduced by 4.7 times in intervention group (OR 4.77, 95% CI 1.29-17.65; p=0.018)."

"Tujuan: untuk menentukan faktor-faktor prediktif penentu lama rawat inap pasien bedah saraf di ICU. Metode:semua pasien yang masuk ICU bedah saraf RS Saraf Prasat, Bangkok, antara 1 Februari dan 31 Juli 2011 ikutserta dalam penelitian. Data demografi dan data klinis pasien untuk setiap variabel dikumpulkan dalam waktu30 menit sejak masuk rumah sakit. Lama rawat inap di ICU dicatat dan dianalisis menggunakan model regresilinear dengan batas kemaknaan statistik p<0,05. Hasil: sebanyak 276 pasien masuk rumah sakit dan 89,1%di antaranya merupakan kasus elektif. Nilai rata-rata (IK 95%) dan median (minimum?maksimum) dari lamarawat inap di ICU adalah 2,36 (2,09-2,63) dan 2 (1-25) hari. Variabel yang berkaitan dengan lama rawat inapdi ICU dan persentase perubahannya (IK 95%) meliputi Glasgow Coma Scale motor subscore (GCSm), 6,72%(-11,20 hingga -2,01) lebih rendah untuk setiap perubahan 1 skor poin; pH darah, 1,16% (0,11 hingga 2,21)lebih tinggi untuk setiap perubahan 0,01 satuan; dan jenis kegawatdaruratan saat masuk rawat, 58,30% (29,16hingga 94,0) lebih tinggi bila dibandingkan dengan masuk rawat karena alasan elektif. Kesimpulan: GCSm, pHdan kegawatdaruratan saat masuk rawat ternyata merupakan variabel prediktif utama untuk lama rawat pasienbedah saraf yang dirawat di ICU. Meskipun demikian, model ini perlu diteliti lebih lanjut pada ukuran sampelyang lebih besar dan menggunakan analisis subkelompok.Aim: to determine the predictive factors on the length of stay of neurosurgical patients in the ICU setting.Methods: all patients admitted to the neurosurgical ICU between February 1 and July 31, 2011 were recruited.Patient demographics and clinical data for each variable were collected within 30 minutes of admission. TheICU length of stay was recorded and analyzed by linear regression model with statistical significance at p-value<0.05. Results: there were 276 patients admitted, of whom 89.1% were elective cases. The mean (95% CI) andmedian (min-max) of ICU length of stay were 2.36 (2.09-2.63) and 2 (1-25) days. The variables associated withICU length of stay and their percent change (95% CI) were the Glasgow Coma Scale motor subscore (GCSm),6.72% (-11.20 to -2.01) lower for every 1 point score change; blood pH, 1.16% (0.11 to 2.21) higher for every0.01 unit change; and emergency admission type, 58.30% (29.16 to 94.0) higher as compared to electiveadmission. Conclusion: the GCSm, pH and emergency admission were found to be the main predictive variables of neurosurgical patient length of stay in the intensive care unit, however, the model should be further exploredin a larger sample size and using subgroup analysis."

"Pendekatan integrasi antara terapi paliatif dan perawatan penyakit kronik dan atau mengancam jiwa telah banyak digunakan dalam beberapa tahun terakhir. Hingga saat ini, masih banyak yang beranggapan bahwa terapi paliatif hanya ditujukan untuk pasien dengan penyakit berat yang sudah berada di stadium terminal atau akhir hidupnya, namun pada kenyataannya banyak pasien mendapatkan manfaat dari terapi paliatif sedini mungkin. Penelitian ini merupakan uji klinis acak terkontrol yang bertujuan untuk mengetahui manfaat integrasi terapi paliatif pada pasien anak dengan penyakit keganasan. Pasien terdiri dari anak  dengan penyakit keganasan usia 2-18 tahun yang dikonsulkan kepada tim paliatif. Pasien dibagi menjadi dua kelompok secara acak, yakni kelompok kontrol (30 anak) dan kelompok intervensi (30 anak). Intervensi berupa kunjungan rumah, komunikasi dua arah antara tenaga terlatih dengan pasien dan orang tua, dibagi menjadi 6 sesi (1 sesi setiap 2 minggu) yang berfokus pada edukasi penyelesaian masalah, manajemen gejala, perawatan diri sendiri, komunikasi, pembuatan keputusan dan pendampingan rencana perawatan lanjutan. Pasien diikuti dan dilakukan penilaian kualitas hidup dengan kuesioner Pediatric Quality of  Life Innitiative (PedsQLTM) modul kanker 3.0, intensitas gejala dinilai dengan Edmonton Symptoms Assesment Score (ESAS), frekuensi kunjungan unit gawat darurat (UGD) pasien anak dengan penyakit keganasan dicatat selama periode penelitian dan dibandingkan dengan sebelum penelitian. Kelompok intervensi memiliki kualitas hidup lebih tinggi bermakna (81,63) dibandingkan kelompok kontrol (62,39), p<0,001. Ranah kualitas hidup yang paling meningkat secara signifikan adalah ranah nyeri, mual, kecemasan prosedur, kecemasan tata laksana, dan khawatir. Intervensi paliatif dapat menurunkan intensitas gangguan tidur (p=0,003) dan anoreksia pada pasien (p<0,001). Intervensi paliatif dapat menurunkan kunjungan UGD sebanyak 4,77 kali pada pasien anak dengan penyakit keganasan (OR 4,77, 95% IK 1,29-17,65; p=0,018).

---

In these last few years, an integrated approach between palliative care and chronic and/or life-threatening conditions care have been widely used. Many people think that palliative care is only intended for those with end stage of disease or in the end of life period. In fact, many patients had benefit from early palliative integration. This study is aimed to know the role of palliative intervention in child with malignancy. A randomized controlled trial comparing patients who were given palliative care (a 3-month home visit) and those who were not (intervention vs control group) was conducted, each group containing 30 patients. Patients consisted of children with cancer aged 2-18 years old who were consulted to palliative team. A two-way communication between a trained health worker and patients with or without their parents were conducted as the intervention (report by proxy or self-report). Interventions were given in 6 sessions (1 session every 2 weeks) focusing on problems solving education, symptoms management, self-care, communication, decision making, and long-term care plan assistance. In the first and twelfth week of the intervention, all patients were assessed with the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQLTM) questionnaire cancer module 3.0. Symptomps intensity were assessed by Edmonton Symptoms Assesment Score (ESAS). Emergency room admissions from the last 3 months were noted before patients were enrolled in the study. During the follow up period, ER admissions were recorded further. Data was analyzed using bivariate analysis, OR calculations were performed to see the effect of interventions on outcomes in this study. A significant difference of quality of life was found between the two groups with average total score in control group 62.39 and intervention group 81.63 (p<0.001). Most significant increased domains were pain, nausea, procedural anxiety, treatment anxiety, and worry. Intensity of sleep disturbance (p=0.003) and anorexia (p<0.001) were decreased significantly in intervention group. Emergency room admissions were reduced by 4.7 times in intervention group (OR 4.77, 95% CI 1.29-17.65; p=0.018)."