Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Erector spinae plane (ESP) block merupakan metode anestesi regional baru dengan tingkat keamanan tinggi dan tingkat ambulasi yang baik, namun memiliki studi yang terbatas mengenai efektivitasnya. Hingga saat ini, bukti efektivitas teknik tersebut pada pasien pembedahan percutaneous nephrolitotomy (PCNL) masih terbatas. Teknik spinal adalah teknik anestesi regional yang paling banyak digunakan pada PCNL dan belum ada penelitian yang membandingkan efektivitas kedua teknik tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan efektivitas blok ESP dibandingkan spinal sebagai teknik anestesi dan analgesia pada PCNL. Penelitian uji klinis tersamar tunggal dilakukan pada subjek yang menjalani PCNL. Pasien berusia 18 tahun dengan ASA 1-3 dan pertama kali menjalani PCNL diikutsertakan dalam penelitian. Pasien dengan single functional kidney, memiliki kontraindikasi pemberian obat anestesi lokal, gangguan kardiovaskular berat, hambatan komunikasi, nyeri kronis, atau hamil dieksklusi. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimental dengan rancangan uji klinis terkontrol acak tersamar tunggal. Pasien dirandomisasi dengan cara random sampling menggunakan teknik randomisasi blok menjadi kelompok ESP dan spinal. Sebanyak 30 subjek (15 ESP dan 15 spinal) diikutsertakan dalam penelitian. Tidak ada perbedaan insiden konversi ke anestesi umum antar kelompok (20%% ESP vs. 0% spinal, p > 0,05). Tidak ada perbedaan kadar IL-6 plasma antar kelompok (p > 0,05). Didapatkan skala nyeri yang lebih tinggi saat bergerak saat pengukuran di ruang PACU, 6 jam, dan 24 jam pascabeda pada kelompok ESP (p < 0,05). Tidak ada perbedaan konsumsi opioid 24 jam pascabedah antar kelompok (median 60 mg ESP vs. 52,5 mg spinal, p > 0,05). Maka dari itu, blok erector spinae plane tidak lebih baik dibandingkan teknik spinal sebagai anestesi tunggal dan analgesia pascabedah pada PCNL.......Introduction: The erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a novel regional anesthetic method with high safety and good ambulation rate but has limited studies on its effectiveness. To date, evidence of the effectiveness of these techniques in surgical patients such as percutaneous nephrolitotomy (PCNL) is limited. Until now, spinal technique is still the most widely used regional anesthetic technique in PCNL. However, there are no studies comparing the effectiveness of the two techniques.Aim: To compare the effectiveness of ESP block versus spinal as an anesthetic and analgesia technique in PCNL.Methods: A single-blinded clinical trial study was conducted on subjects undergoing PCNL. Patients aged 18 years with ASA 1-3 and first undergoing PCNL were included in the study. Patients with a single functional kidney, contraindications to local anesthetics, severe cardiovascular disorders, communication barriers, chronic pain, or pregnancy were excluded. Patients were randomized using random allocation sampling into the ESP and spinal groups.Results: A total of 30 subjects (15 ESP and 15 spinal) were included in the study. There was no difference in the incidence of conversion to general anesthesia between groups (20%% ESP vs. 0% spinal, p > 0.05). There was no difference in plasma IL-6 levels between groups (p > 0.05). There was a higher pain scale when moving when measured in the PACU, 6 hours, and 24 hours after the difference in the ESP group (p < 0.05). There were no differences in both groups regarding 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption (median 60 mg ESP vs. 52.5 mg spinal, p > 0.05).Conclusion: The erector spinae plane block is not better than spinal block as a sole anesthesia and postoperative analgesia technique in PCNL."

"ABSTRACTThe objective of this study was to determine the activity of erector spinae muscle in four techniques of lifting phase of manual human handling; two-handed seat carry, four-handed seat carry, fore-and-aft carry and chair carry. Thirty-two (16 couples) healthy young men lifted subjects weighing 60±5 kg from table heights of 50 cm and 100 cm. Surface electromyography was used to evaluate lumbar erector spinae activity during lifting. The four-handed seat carry technique had the highest average of lumbar erector spinae activity both from table height 50 cm and 100 cm. This may be due to more trunk flexion movement than in other techniques. The lowest activity of lumbar erector spinae was found in fore-and-aft carry and chair carry techniques. Moreover, lifting from table height 50 cm had more lumbar erector spinae muscle activity than lifting from table height 100 cm in 3 techniques (two-handed seat carry, four-handed seat carry and fore-and-aft carry). The highest activity of lumbar erector spinae muscle in the four-handed seat carry technique indicated risk of low back pain during lifting, especially lifting people from a table height of 50 cm. Lower lumbar erector spinae muscle activity in fore-and-aft carry and chair carry techniques indicated safer they are safer techniques for lifting."

"Pendahuluan: Nefrektomi donor hidup perlaparoskopi adalah pendekatan standar emas untuk bedah ginjal donor hidup dikaitkan dengan nyeri pascabedah yang lebih ringan. RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo merupakan pusat transplantasi ginjal terbesar di Indonesia. Saat ini pembedahan donor ginjal hidup dilakukan dengan menggunakan pendekatan transperitoneum menjadi retroperitoneum untuk mengurangi komplikasi berupa cidera organ viseral. Perubahan ini menyebabkan teknik blok tranverse abdominis plane (TAP) dan blok quadratus lumborum (QL) pendekatan anterior dianggap tidak memadai sebagai suplementasi analgesia intraoperatif, teknik anestesi regional yang dianggap tepat untuk pendekatan retroperitoneal adalah teknik blok erector spinae plane (ESP) dan blok QL pendekatan anterior subcostal yang terletak lebih posterior. Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) merupakan salah satu instrumen yang dapat menilai derajat nyeri dan gangguan nyeri kronik terhadap kegiatan sehari-hari yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini.Metode: Penelitian dilakukan dengan desain kohort retrospektif untuk analisis insiden dan derajat nyeri kronik terhadap teknik blok ESP dan blok QL pada pasien laparoskopik donor ginjal hidup dengan teknik retroperitoneum di RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo. Sampel yang akan diambil di penelitian ini adalah semua pasien laparaskopi donor ginjal hidup teknik retroperitoneal minimal tiga bulan pascabedah sampai bulan Oktober 2022 dengan jumlah sampel 138 orang. Dilakukan juga analisa hubungan antara teknik blok dengan derajat akut, hubungan derajat nyeri akut, konsumsi opioid intraoperatif dan jenis analgesia pascabedah terhadap nyeri kronik dan hubungan karakteristik pasien terhadap nyeri kronik. Hasil: Teknik blok ESP dan blok QL tidak berbeda bermakna terhadap insiden (p=0,317) dan derajat nyeri kronik (p=1,000) pascabedah. Insiden nyeri kronik pascabedah laparaskopi donor hidup teknik retroperitoneal adalah 41 orang (27,7%) dengan karakteristik nyeri kronik derajat ringan 39 orang (95,2%). Teknik blok ESP dan blok QL berbeda bermakna terhadap derajat nyeri akut H-0 (p=0,045) dan derajat nyeri akut pascabedah bermakna terhadap insiden nyeri kronik pascabedah (p=0,04). Terdapat hubungan bermakna antara karakteristik pasien pada status pekerjaan (p=0,032) dan jangka waktu pascabedah (p=0,05) terhadap insiden nyeri kronik pada pasien laparoskopik donor ginjal hidup teknik retroperitoneum. Kesimpulan: Teknik blok ESP dan blok QL tidak berbeda bermakna terhadap insiden dan derajat nyeri kronik pascabedah.......Introduction: Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy is the gold standard approach for living donor kidney surgery associated with less postoperative pain. RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo is the largest kidney transplant center in Indonesia. Currently living kidney donor surgery is performed using a transperitoneal approach to retroperitoneum in order to reduce complications of visceral organ injury. This change causes the transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block technique and the anterior approach of quadratus lumborum (QL) block technique to be considered inadequate as a supplement for intraoperative analgesia, regional anesthetic techniques that are considered appropriate for the retroperitoneal approach are the erector spinae plane (ESP) block technique and the QL block approach more posteriorly. The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) is an instrument that can assess the pain severity and pain interferences in daily activities used in this study.Methods: This study was conducted with a retrospective cohort design to analyze the incidence and severity of chronic pain using the ESP block and QL block in living kidney donor laparoscopic patients using retroperitoneum technique at RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo. Samples taken in this study were all living kidney donor laparoscopic patients with retroperitoneal technique for at least three months postoperatively until October 2022 with a total sample of 138 people. Assessment of the correlation between block technique and acute pain severity was also carried out, the correlation between acute pain severity, intraoperative opioid consumption and types of postoperative analgesia to chronic pain and the correlation between patient characteristics and chronic pain.Results: ESP block technique and QL block technique were not significantly different on the incidence (p=0,317) and the severity of chronic pain after surgery (p=1,000). The incidence of chronic pain after laparoscopic living donor retroperitoneal surgery was 41 people (27,7%) with mild chronic pain of 39 people (95,2%). The ESP block technique and QL block technique differed significantly on the degree of acute pain H-0 (p=0,045). The degree of acute postoperative pain was significant to the incidence of postoperative chronic pain (p=0,04) and there was a significant correlation between patient characteristics in occupational status (p=0,032) and the postoperative period to chronic pain (p=0,05).Conclusion: The technique of ESP block and QL block did not differ significantly on the incidence and severity of postoperative chronic pain."

"Latar Belakang: Prosedur dekompresi dan stabilisasi posterior lumbal berhubungan dengan nyeri hebat pascabedah dan menghasilkan respon stress pembedahan. Blok ESP dan blok TLIP efektif sebagai analgesia perioperatif pada prosedur pembedahan tulang belakang. Penatalaksanaan nyeri pascabedah yang adekuat dapat mengurangi respon stres yang timbul akibat pembedahan.Tujuan: Membandingkan efektifitas antara blok ESP dan Blok TLIP sebagai analgesia perioperatif pada prosedur dekompresi dan stabilisasi posterior lumbal terhadap skala nyeri, konsumsi total opioid, kestabilan kardiovaskular, kadar IL-6 dan IL-10 perioperatif. Metode: Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimental, uji klinis acak tersamar ganda terhadap 40 subjek yang menjalani pembedahan dekompresi dan stabilisasi posterior lumbal di Instalasi Bedah Pusat RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Jakarta dan RSUD dr Zainoel Abidin Banda Aceh. Subjek dirandomisasi dalam dua kelompok: kelompok blok ESP (n=20) dan kelompok blok TLIP (n=20). Kedua kelompok mendapat bupivakain 0,25% total volume 20 cc setiap sisi. Data yang diolah berupa skala nyeri NRS (Numerical rating scale) pada 1, 6, 12, 24 jam pascabedah, konsumsi morfin dalam 24 jam, jumlah fentanyl intraoperatif, waktu pemberian morfin pertama pascabedah, konsentrasi IL-6 dan IL-10 perioperatif. Analisis data menggunakan Uji t berpasangan dan Mann-Whitney.Hasil: NRS pada 1, 6, 12, 24 jam pascabedah, konsumsi morfin dalam 24 jam, jumlah fentanyl intraoperatif, konsentrasi IL-6 dan IL-10 perioperatif tidak berbeda bermakna antra blok TLIP dan blok ESP (p>0,05). Waktu pemberian morfin pertama blok TLIP lebih lama bermakna daripada blok ESP (p=0,002).Simpulan: Keefektifan blok TLIP tidak berbeda dengan blok ESP sebagai analgesia perioperatif pada prosedur dekompresi dan stabilisasi posterior lumbal.......Background: Posterior lumbar decompression and stabilization procedures are related with severe postoperative pain and produce a surgical stress response. ESP block and TLIP block are as effective as perioperative analgesia in spinal surgery procedures. Adequate postoperative pain management can reduce stress response caused by surgery.Objective: To compare the effectiveness of ESP block and TLIP block as perioperative analgesia in posterior lumbar decompression and stabilization procedures and associated pain scale, total opioid consumption, cardiovascular stability, perioperative IL-6 and IL-10 consentrations.Methods: This study was an experimental, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of 40 subjects who underwent decompression surgery and posterior lumbar stabilization at the Central Surgical Unit of RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Jakarta and RSUD Dr Zainoel Abidin Banda Aceh. Subjects were randomized into two groups: the ESP block group (n=20) and the TLIP block group (n=20). Both groups received 0.25% bupivacaine with a total volume of 20 cc each side. The data were processed in the form of NRS pain scale (Numerical rating scale) at 1, 6, 12, 24 hours postoperatively, morphine consumption within 24 hours, amount of intraoperative fentanyl, time of first postoperative morphine administration, perioperative IL-6 and IL-10 concentrations. Data analysis used paired t test and Mann-Whitney.Results: NRS at 1, 6, 12, 24 hours postoperatively, morphine consumption within 24 hours, amount of intraoperative fentanyl, perioperative IL-6 and IL-10 concentrations were not significantly different between TLIP block and ESP block (p>0.05). The time of administering the first morphine on TLIP block was significantly longer than ESP block (p=0.002).Conclusion: The effectiveness of the TLIP block is no different from the ESP block as perioperative analgesia in decompression and posterior lumbar stabilization procedures."

"Latar Belakang: Prosedur dekompresi dan stabilisasi posterior lumbal berhubungan dengan nyeri hebat pascabedah dan menghasilkan respon stress pembedahan. Blok ESP dan blok TLIP efektif sebagai analgesia perioperatif pada prosedur pembedahan tulang belakang. Penatalaksanaan nyeri pascabedah yang adekuat dapat mengurangi respon stres yang timbul akibat pembedahan.Tujuan: Membandingkan efektifitas antara blok ESP dan Blok TLIP sebagai analgesia perioperatif pada prosedur dekompresi dan stabilisasi posterior lumbal terhadap skala nyeri, konsumsi total opioid, kestabilan kardiovaskular, kadar IL-6 dan IL-10 perioperatif. Metode: Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimental, uji klinis acak tersamar ganda terhadap 40 subjek yang menjalani pembedahan dekompresi dan stabilisasi posterior lumbal di Instalasi Bedah Pusat RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Jakarta dan RSUD dr Zainoel Abidin Banda Aceh. Subjek dirandomisasi dalam dua kelompok: kelompok blok ESP (n=20) dan kelompok blok TLIP (n=20). Kedua kelompok mendapat bupivakain 0,25% total volume 20 cc setiap sisi. Data yang diolah berupa skala nyeri NRS (Numerical rating scale) pada 1, 6, 12, 24 jam pascabedah, konsumsi morfin dalam 24 jam, jumlah fentanyl intraoperatif, waktu pemberian morfin pertama pascabedah, konsentrasi IL-6 dan IL-10 perioperatif. Analisis data menggunakan Uji t berpasangan dan Mann-Whitney.Hasil: NRS pada 1, 6, 12, 24 jam pascabedah, konsumsi morfin dalam 24 jam, jumlah fentanyl intraoperatif, konsentrasi IL-6 dan IL-10 perioperatif tidak berbeda bermakna antra blok TLIP dan blok ESP (p>0,05). Waktu pemberian morfin pertama blok TLIP lebih lama bermakna daripada blok ESP (p=0,002).Simpulan: Keefektifan blok TLIP tidak berbeda dengan blok ESP sebagai analgesia perioperatif pada prosedur dekompresi dan stabilisasi posterior lumbal.......Background: Posterior lumbar decompression and stabilization procedures are related with severe postoperative pain and produce a surgical stress response. ESP block and TLIP block are as effective as perioperative analgesia in spinal surgery procedures. Adequate postoperative pain management can reduce stress response caused by surgery.Objective: To compare the effectiveness of ESP block and TLIP block as perioperative analgesia in posterior lumbar decompression and stabilization procedures and associated pain scale, total opioid consumption, cardiovascular stability, perioperative IL-6 and IL-10 consentrations.Methods: This study was an experimental, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of 40 subjects who underwent decompression surgery and posterior lumbar stabilization at the Central Surgical Unit of RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Jakarta and RSUD Dr Zainoel Abidin Banda Aceh. Subjects were randomized into two groups: the ESP block group (n=20) and the TLIP block group (n=20). Both groups received 0.25% bupivacaine with a total volume of 20 cc each side. The data were processed in the form of NRS pain scale (Numerical rating scale) at 1, 6, 12, 24 hours postoperatively, morphine consumption within 24 hours, amount of intraoperative fentanyl, time of first postoperative morphine administration, perioperative IL-6 and IL-10 concentrations. Data analysis used paired t test and Mann-Whitney.Results: NRS at 1, 6, 12, 24 hours postoperatively, morphine consumption within 24 hours, amount of intraoperative fentanyl, perioperative IL-6 and IL-10 concentrations were not significantly different between TLIP block and ESP block (p>0.05). The time of administering the first morphine on TLIP block was significantly longer than ESP block (p=0.002).Conclusion: The effectiveness of the TLIP block is no different from the ESP block as perioperative analgesia in decompression and posterior lumbar stabilization procedures."