Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan urgensi keberadaan extraordinary measures dalam proses penanganan extraordinary crime korupsi. Penulis menggunakan metode kualitatif deskriptif-eksplanatif untuk mengkaji tulisan ini. Data yang digunakan untuk menunjang ide argumentasi tulisan berasal dari kajian literatur dan kajian dokumen. Adapun konsep dan teori utama yang digunakan untuk membangun argumentasi dalam tulisan ini adalah konsep prisma kejahatan; white-collar crime; teori keadilan; teori proporsionalitas pemidanaan; dan teori hukum responsif. Hasil dari rumusan Karya Akhir ini menyatakan bahwa korupsi merupakan extraordinary crime yang memiliki dampak destruktif bagi masyarakat dan negara, namun dinyatakan sulit untuk diidentifikasi serta dalam proses penanganannya kerap kali mengalami inefektivitas hukum. Dalam hal ini, proses penghukuman bagi pelaku korupsi masih mengabaikan unsur proporsionalitas pemidanaan, sehingga vonis pemidanaan yang diberikan kepada para pelaku tidak lepas dari adanya disparitas. Berangkat dari permasalahan kerugian, sulitnya identifikasi dan inefektivitas penghukuman dalam perkara korupsi, maka jenis kejahatan ini membutuhkan prosedur penanganan yang luar biasa “extraordinary measures” guna memenuhi aspek proporsionalitas, keadilan bagi masyarakat, dan kondisi hukum yang lebih responsif. Extraordinary measures dalam tulisan ini dirumuskan dengan integrasi antara counter measures-pre judicial method dan aspek penghukuman post judicial method. Counter measures-pre judicial method terdiri dari whistleblowing system, beban pembuktian terbalik, dan keberadaan justice collaborator. Sementara itu, aspek penghukuman post judicial method merujuk pada konvergensi proporsional antara penjara, denda, ganti rugi dan perampasan aset, pencabutan hak politik, remisi, dan pembebasan bersyarat, serta pemberlakuan reintegrative shaming yang keseluruhannya dilakukan secara dinamis.

---

This paper aims to explain the urgency of extraordinary measures in the process of handling extraordinary crime corruption. The author uses a descriptive-explanatory qualitative method to review this paper. The data used to support the idea of writing argumentation comes from literature review and document review. The main concepts and theories used to build the argumentation in this paper are the concept of crime prism; white-collar crime; justice theory; theory of proportionality of punishment; and responsive legal theory. The results of the formulation of this Final Paper state that corruption is an extraordinary crime that has a destructive impact on society and the state, but is declared difficult to identify and in the process of handling it often experiences legal ineffectiveness. In this case, the punishment process for perpetrators of corruption still ignores the element of proportionality of punishment, so that the sentences given to the perpetrators cannot be separated from the disparity. Departing from the problem of losses, the difficulty of identification and the ineffectiveness of punishment in corruption cases, this type of crime requires extraordinary handling procedures "extraordinary measures" to fulfill aspects of proportionality, justice for the community, and more responsive legal conditions. Extraordinary measures in this paper are formulated by integrating counter measures-pre judicial method and post judicial method punishment aspects. Counter measures-pre judicial method consists of whistleblowing system, reverse burden of proof, and the existence of justice collaborators. Meanwhile, the punishment aspect of the post judicial method refers to the proportional convergence between imprisonment, fines, compensation and asset forfeiture, deprivation of political rights, remission, and parole, as well as the implementation of reintegrative shaming, all of which are carried out dynamically.

"

"ABSTRAKIn 1999, the Government of Indonesia established Government Regulation (GR) 32/1999 on the Procedures for The Implementation of the Rights of Inmates and has been amended lastly by GR 99/2012. However, the establishment of GR 99/2012 creates complication and unfairly discriminates against inmates committing to an extraordinary crimes (terrorism, drug abuse, corruption, crimes against the security of the state, crimes against humanity and other transnational organized crimes) that impedes such inmates to submit remission and parole. This paper examines the consistency between the implementation of GR 99/2012 and the concept of criminal punishment in Indonesia. This paper is a summary of empirical juridical research that reports the influences of GR 99/2012 on inmates in correctional institutions. Data used for this research was obtained from interviews, observation, desk reviews and focus group discussion with government officials. Based on the findings, it could be inferred that GR 99/2012 has impeded the fulfillment of the inmates rights on parole and remission due to complication of procedures, additional fines, and multi interpretation of the regulation. Furthermore, it affects the aggravation of overcrowding, violations against inmates rights, and illegal practices within the process. Based on the analysis as discussed in this paper, GR 99/2012 is inconsistent with the concept of criminal punishment in Indonesia because it impedes inmates to return within society. This paper proposes that GR 99/2012 should be revoked and revised in accordance with the spirit of Corrections Act and to creat synergy among law enforcers in fulfilling the inmates rights."