Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Karena nilai budayanya, metafora disetujui sebagai salah satu masalah penerjemahan, terutama dalam penerjemahan sastra. Dengan demikian, makalah ini menggabungkan teori prosedur penerjemahan yang dikemukakan oleh Peter Newmark (1988) dan Gideon Toury's (1995) serta teori foreingnisasi dan domestikasi yang dikemukakan oleh Venuti (1995). Makalah ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana prosedur penerjemahan metafora, serta strategi penerjemahan foreignisasi dan domestikasi, diterapkan dalam dua terjemahan bahasa Indonesia dari novel berjudul Frankenstein yang ditulis oleh Mary Shelley. Penelitian ini menggunakan dua hasil terjemahan yang berbeda untuk mengumpulkan data. Terjemahan pertama (TT1) diterbitkan oleh Gramedia Publisher, dan terjemahan kedua (TT2) diterbitkan oleh Qanita Publisher. Penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dari tujuh prosedur yang digunakan, hanya satu yang tidak diterapkan. Penelitian ini juga mengungkapkan bahwa kedua terjemahan tersebut menggunakan strategi foreignisasi dan domestikasi. Namun, TT1 condong ke arah foreignisasi dan TT2 cenderung lebih menggunakan strategi domestikasi. ......Because of its cultural value, metaphor is agreed as one of the translation problems, especially in literary translation. Thus, this paper combines theories of translation procedures proposed by Peter Newmark (1988) and Gideon Toury’s (1995) and foreignization and domestication theories proposed by Venuti (1995). This paper aims to analyze how the procedure of metaphor translation, as well as the translation strategies of foreignization and domestication, are applied in two Indonesian translations of a novel titled Frankenstein by Mary Shelley. This research uses two different translations of the novel to collect the data. The first translation (TT1) is published by Gramedia Publisher, and the second translation (TT2) is published by Qanita Publisher. The research shows that out of the seven procedures that are utilized, only one that is not applied. Also, this research reveals that the two translations use both of foreignization and domestication strategy. However, TT1 leans towards foreignization and TT2 tends to involve domestication moreBecause of its cultural value, metaphor is agreed as one of the translation problems, especially in literary translation. Thus, this paper combines theories of translation procedures proposed by Peter Newmark (1988) and Gideon Toury’s (1995) and foreignization and domestication theories proposed by Venuti (1995). This paper aims to analyze how the procedure of metaphor translation, as well as the translation strategies of foreignization and domestication, are applied in two Indonesian translations of a novel titled Frankenstein by Mary Shelley. This research uses two different translations of the novel to collect the data. The first translation (TT1) is published by Gramedia Publisher, and the second translation (TT2) is published by Qanita Publisher. The research shows that out of the seven procedures that are utilized, only one that is not applied. Also, this research reveals that the two translations use both of foreignization and domestication strategy. However, TT1 leans towards foreignization and TT2 tends to involve domestication more.

Abstrak :
A literary text typically contains many cultural elements often presented in a very concise manner to enhance its readability and aesthetic quality. Its translation can be challenging when there is a gap between source culture and target culture. Thus, a translator has to make an ideological choice: either to foreignize or to domesticize. This paper aims to identify and examine the ideology applied by a literary translator when translating culturally-divergent translation units. Bram Stoker’s Dracula and its Indonesian translation by Suwarni were selected as data source due to the novel’s significant number of cultural references unfamiliar to modern Indonesians. Forty units were selected for this paper and classified into several groups. Results show that the translator used various strategies, both foreignizing and domesticizing ones, to translate even similar units, indicating her considerable freedom. Furthermore, the results also show that translation ideology is a flexible concept which can shift throughout a translation project and be represented as a multipoint continuum. Moreover, both foreignization and domestication may take place at different levels, depending on various factors such as presence of information, extent of modification, and relevance of information.