Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) lembaga yang mengatur penyelesaian sengketa nama domain, menentukan pula hukum yang berlaku hingga forum yang berwenang. Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) merupakan hukum yang diberlakukan ICANN. Forum yang berwenang menyelesaikan sengketa yaitu arbitrase online yang diakreditasi oleh ICANN. Perbedaan kewarganegaraan para pihak yang bersengketa menimbulkan peristiwa Hukum Perdata Internasional (HPI) yang akan dianalisis dalam kasus Dallas Project Holdings Ltd. v. Alexander Halim Putra, Victoria's Secret Stores Brand Management Inc. v. Tuty Rakhmawaty, Disney Enterprises Inc. v. Hasil penelitian akan memperlihatkan bahwa terdapat peristiwa HPI dalam kasus sengketa nama domain.

---

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) is agency that regulates domain name dispute settlement, including determining applicable law and also competent forum. Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) is law enacted by ICANN. Similarly, competent forum for dispute resolution is online arbitration that accredited by ICANN. Nationality difference for both parties that have a dispute raises aspects to the Private International Law which will analyzed in the case of Dallas Project Holdings Ltd. v. Alexander Halim Putra, Victoria's Secret Stores Brand Management Inc. v. Tuty Rakhmawaty, Disney Enterprises Inc. v. Personal. The results will show aspects of private international law in the case of domain name disputes."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peraturan perundang-undangan terkait pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional dan prakteknya di lembaga peradilan di Indonesia berdasarkan aspek-aspek Hukum Perdata Internasional. Penulis menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketentuan mengenai pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional dalam UU Arbitrase belum jelas dan memadai. Hal ini dapat dilihat dari berbagai aturan mengenai pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional dan alasan-alasan pembatalan putusan arbitrase. Lembaga peradilan di Indonesia pada prakteknya masih inkonsisten dalam menerapkan aturan-aturan tersebut. Contohnya adalah kasus antara PT Sumber Subur Mas, Yusman Tamara, Imelda Irawan melawan Transpac Capital Pte. Ltd., dan Transpac Industrial Holdings Limited ;dan kasus antara PT Daya Mandiri Resources Indonesia (d/h PT Risna Karya Wardhana Mandiri) dan PT Dayaindo Resources melawan Suek AG.

---

Arbitral Award with the practice of Indonesian Court in accordance with the aspects of Private International Law. The author uses a juridical-normative research method with an addition of literature studies.

This research shows that the regulation about the annulment of international arbitral award in Law of Arbitration has not been clear and sufficient. This can be seen from numerous rules about the annulment of International Arbitral Award and the grounds of the annulment of arbitral awards. The Indonesian Court has been inconsistent to implement these regulations.

The examples are the case between Transpac Capital Pte. Ltd., and Transpac Industrial Holdings Limited; and the case between PT Daya Mandiri Resources Indonesia (d/h PT Risna Karya Wardhana Mandiri) and PT Dayaindo Resources melawan Suek AG."