Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"The study was conducted between September and October 2006 in various sites both inside and outside and outside the taklong Island national marine Reserve (TINMAR),southern Guimars,Philippines,to immediately conduct a rapid 3-month assessment of the impact of the solar I il spill incident which occurred in August 11,2006 in southern Guimaras...."

"Tesis ini membahas tentang proses kajian dampak sosial yang dilakukan Artha Graha Network guna untuk mengantisipasi dan mencegah dampak negatif dan mengoptimalkan dampak positif dari setiap kegiatan bisnis yang dilakukan perusahaan di lingkungan masyarakat serta latar belakang dari pelaksanaan tanggung jawab sosial di Artha Graha. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian studi kasus. Hasil penelitian ini menujukkan bahwa pihak Artha Graha menggunakan gambaran yang diperoleh dari kajian dampak sosial menjadi rekomendasi dan guidance bagi mereka dalam melaksanakan aktifitas tanggung jawab sosial perusahaannya.

---

This thesis discusses about the social impact assessment process conducted by Artha Graha Network in order to anticipate and prevent negative impacts and optimize the positive impacts of any company's business activity in the community as well as the background of the implementation of social responsibility in Artha Graha. This research used a qualitative approach with the type of research is case study. The findings of this research showed that Artha Graha uses images obtained from the social impact assessment to be the recommendation and guidance for them to implement corporate social responsibility activities."

"ABSTRACTLicensing is one way for business actors to formalize business. Without licensing, businesses are unable to move to the formal sector and get a variety of benefits such as coaching programs, tax incentives and getting credit or capital assistance, especially from banks and legal guarantees. Nevertheless, business operators consider that licensing services are still not optimal. Business actors complaints include inefficient and effective services caused by weak institutional aspects. Institutional improvement of the Capital Investment Agency and the One-Stop Integrated Service (DPMPTSP) to reach the prime point will have an impact on the ease of service and improve the investment climate. The main method used in this study is the Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) supported using Regulatory Mapping (Regmap) to determine the regulatory map that contributes to the institutional aspects of DPMPTSP. The results of the analysis revealed that the root cause of the weakness of DPMPTSP's institutions was the absence of DPMPTSPs institutional improvement program. The root causes of these problems contribute to some of the problems in optimizing DPMPTSP institutions such as the Standard Operational Procedure (SOP) that is not updated, the lack of competence of the implementing apparatus, the delay in anticipating changes in regulations of the central authority. Alternative corrective actions from the results of the analysis are the devolution of authority for licensing services, preparation of guidelines for Standard Procedure Norms Criteria (NSPK), institutional regulation updates, preparation of local regulations related to institutional implementation, SOP formulation of licensing services, placement of technical human resources, and development of infrastructure facilities."

"Penelitian ini akan mengenalisis penerapan prinsip foreseeability of harm dalam perjanjian internasional dan sengketa lingkungan internasional. Berangkat dari konsep necessity, prinsip foreseeability of harm memerlukan keseimbangan antara memprediksi kemungkinan kerugian dan mengambil langkah-langkah yang wajar untuk mencegahnya, memastikan bahwa negara bertindak secara bertanggung jawab tanpa terbebani secara tidak adil oleh konsekuensi yang tidak dapat diperkirakan. Namun, dalam perkembangannya sering kali ditemukan tantangan dan hambatan dalam penerapannya yang berkeadilan, bahkan menjadi perdebatan antara hakim-hakim yang meutus suatu perkara. Ditulis menggunakan metode penelitian doktrinal dan peninjauan pustaka, tujuan utama dari penelitian ini adalah melihat perbedaan terhadap penerapan prinsip ini dari setiap perjanjian internasional dan dalam setiap sengketa berkaitan dengan lingkungan. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga melihat secara spesifik metode yang digunakan oleh setiap perjanjian internasional dan penyelesaian kasus oleh pengadilan internasional, seperti kewajiban melakukan pengkajian dampak lingkungan sebelum melakukan suatu proyek, dan lain-lain. Akhir dari penelitian ini akan memberikan kesimpulan terhadap setiap pertanyaan yang diajukan dan saran untuk penerapannya di kemudian hari.

---

This research will identify the application of the principle of foreseeability of harm in international agreements and international environmental disputes. Departing from the concept of necessity, the principle of foreseeability of harm requires a balance between predicting possible harm and taking reasonable steps to prevent it, ensuring that states act responsibly without being unfairly burdened by unforeseen consequences. However, in its development, challenges and obstacles are often found in its fair implementation, and it even becomes a debate between the judges who decide on a case. Written using doctrinal research methods and conducting a literature review, the main aim of this research is to see the differences in the application of this principle in every international agreement and in every dispute related to the environment. Apart from that, this research also looks specifically at the methods used by each international agreement and the resolution of cases by international courts, such as the obligation to carry out environmental impact assessments before carrying out a project, and so on. The end of this research will provide conclusions on each question asked and suggestions for future implementation. This research will identify the application of the principle of foreseeability of harm in international agreements and international environmental disputes. Departing from the concept of necessity, the principle of foreseeability of harm requires a balance between predicting possible harm and taking reasonable steps to prevent it, ensuring that states act responsibly without being unfairly burdened by unforeseen consequences. However, in its development, challenges and obstacles are often found in its fair implementation, and it even becomes a debate between the judges who decide on a case. Written using doctrinal research methods and conducting a literature review, the main aim of this research is to see the differences in the application of this principle in every international agreement and in every dispute related to the environment. Apart from that, this research also looks specifically at the methods used by each international agreement and the resolution of cases by international courts, such as the obligation to carry out environmental impact assessments before carrying out a project, and so on. The end of this research will provide conclusions on each question asked and suggestions for future implementation."

"ABSTRAKPangan merupakan kebutuhan mendasar dalam kehidupan manusia,khususnya untuk anak-anak yang sedang mengalami masa pertumbuhandiperlukan pangan yang aman dan bergizi. Masih tingginya angka keracunanyang disebabkan oleh pangan jajan di Indonesia dan jumlah hasil sampling danpengujian pangan jajan yang tidak memenuhi syarat (TMS), menggerakkan BadanPOM untuk menyusun suatu kebijakan dalam bentuk intervensi kepada sekolah(sekolah dasar) termasuk di Propinsi DKI Jakarta. Intervensi kebijakan yangdiberikan oleh BPOM kepada sekolah dibedakan menjadi dua yaitu intervensikebijakan yang lengkap yaitu dengan melakukan sampling dan pengujian PJAS,rapid test kit dengan mobil keliling, memberikan bimbingan teknis, serta KIE danpenyebaran produk informasi berupa poster, leaflet, CD yang berisi tentangedukasi pangan yang baik. Sementara intervensi kebijakan yang lain adalahdengan memberikan KIE secara singkat dan menyebarkan produk informasi saja.Dengan menggunakan metodologi regulatory impact assessment (RIA),penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengukur dampak kebijakan yang berupa intervensiterhadap kesadaran kelompok sasaran yaitu komunitas sekolah. Dari penelitianyang dilakukan diperoleh hasil bahwa intervensi kebijakan A yaitu denganmemberikan secara lengkap termasuk pengujian sampel PJAS memberikan hasilberupa kesadaran yang lebih baik dibanding dengan intervensi kebijakan C yanghanya memberikan produk informasi. Kelompok sasaran sekolah yangdiintervensi kebijakan A mempunyai kesadaran yang sangat baik, sementarauntuk intervensi C adalah cukup baik. Demikian halnya penilaian kualitaskeamanan pangan di sekolah untuk sekolah yang diintervensi A, rata-rata menilaikualitas kondisi sudah baik, sementara untuk sekolah yang diintervensi C masihmemerlukan upaya peningkatan yang lebih intensif.

---

ABSTRACTFood is a basic necessity in human life, especially for children who are experiencing a period of growth required a safe and nutritious food. A high rate of food poisoning caused by eating snacks in Indonesia and the number of sampling and lab testing results of snack foods are substandard. That reason encourage National Agency of Drug and Food Control (NADFC) for developing a policy in the form of intervention to school (elementary school) included in DKI Jakarta. Policy interventions provided by the NADFC to school divided into two policies intervention, first is to conduct sampling and testing PJAS, rapid test kit with the car around, provide technical guidance, as well as IEC and dissemination of information products such as posters, leaflets, CDs containing about good food education. While other policy interventions is to provide a brief IEC and disseminate product information only.By using the methodology of regulatory impact assessment (RIA), this study aims to measure the impact of policies intervention to improve awareness of the target group as community school. From research done shows that a policy intervention is to provide complete application, including testing of samples PJAS to result in better awareness compared with C policy interventions that only provide product information. Target group A policy intervention schools have a very good awareness, while for intervention C is enough to good. Similarly, the quality assessment of food safety in schools for the intervention school A, the average rate the quality of the conditions are good, while for school intervention C still require more intensive efforts."

"Dalam proses penyusunan dan penilaian studi terdapat kecenderungan bahwa penilaian sering menimbulkan tekanan terhadap penilai, konsultan maupun pemrakarsa diluar kesepakatan dalam kerangka acuan.Penelitian ini untuk mengetahui efektivitas kinerja penyusunan dan penilaian di Komisi. Tekanan tersebut menjadikan suatu arah analisis melalui Evaluasi Kinerja Komisi yang dilakukan dengan Cara pendekatan terhadap Kinerja Penilai, Penyusun dan Pemrakarsa.Kinerja Penilai tergambar dengan melihat perilaku Komisi Penilai yang menyangkut kepemimpinan, kebijakan, sertifikasi, pendidikan, pengataman, risalah atau notulen rapat, rekomendasi atau janji, kerjasama maupun prosedur.Kinerja pemrakarsa menyangkut kondisi pemahaman terhadap rencana fisik, aspek lingkungan, AMDAL, pengendalian konsultan, perbaikan penyusunan, dan pemanfaatan Rencana Pengelolaan dan Pemantauan Lingkungan. Kriteria Konsultan menyangkut kondisi pengalaman, peran dan kemampuan ketua dan anggota tim, pendidikan, pengalaman, kursus, target waktu maupun target laporan.Disamping itu ada kendala non teknis dalam proses penyusunan maupun penilaian yang sering menghambat profesionalisme konsultan baik menyangkut dana, waktu, tenaga, terutama yang terkait dengan alokasi dana, waktu, tenaga, terutama yang terkait dengan alokasi biaya pembahasan dan campur tangan pihak tertentu yang mengurangi netralitas dalam proses penyusunan.Hasil penilaian yang baik memberikan kecenderungan bahwa hasil studi akan bermanfaat dalam kelangsungan pembangunan yang berkelanjutan. Hasil studi yang baik ditentukan oleh 3 indikator yaitu penyusunan oleh konsultan yang cermat analisisnya, penilaian yang terfokus dan pemahaman pemrakarsa dalam pemanfaatan rencana pengelolaan dan pemantauan lingkungan . Pemahaman aspek teknis dan aspek lingkungan yang berhubungan dengan rencana kegiatan yang akan dibangun sangat rendah hal ini akan mempengaruhi produk akhir dokumen studi.Penerapan hasil studi yang relatif rendah perlu menjadi koreksi bagi para pengambil kebijakan . Beberapa pendapat dan upaya untuk meningkatkan penyempurnaan sistem penilaian adalah melakukan sertifikasi terhadap penyusun, atau penilai baik secara perorangan maupun kelompok, khususnya peran organisasi profesi untuk mewujudkan sistem pengendalian terhadap kualitas dan mutu kelompok penyusun atau ketompok penilai. Penilaian lebih terkendali apabila peran serta organisasi profesi bersama-sama birokrasi .Daftar Pustaka : 44 (1987 - 2.004)

---

There is an indication that grading often leads grading commissions pressure to consultant and pioneer out side the frame works. This research to understand the effectiveness of structuring work and grading in the commission.

Pressure needs analysis direction trough working evaluation of the commission that that is carried out by approaching grading team work, composer and initial person.

The works off grading team work trough viewing attitude of grading team work in the line with leadership, policy certification, education, experience, minute of meeting, recommendation or promise, collaboration as well as procedure.

The criteria of pioneer involves understanding the condition of physical plan, environmental aspect, Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), consultant controlling, renewing structure and utilizing Planning Assessment and Monitoring Assessment.

The criteria of consultant involves experience condition, the role and capability of leader and team members, education, experiences, training, time target and report target.

Besides, there is no technical obstacle either instructuring or in grading process that often block consultant professionalism. Connected with fund, time energy, as well as environmental management particularly fund allocation, discussion, and intervention in structuring process.

The result of a good research would indicate that the study would give input to the on going and continuous development.

The result of the determined by 3 indicators, namely, consultant structuring who has sharp analysis. Consistent grading and pioneers understanding in implementation.

The understanding of technical and environmental aspect related with very low environment of this case would influence the final product of the study document.

Some efforts to improve the grading system perfection are to carry out consultant certification, grading as well as structuring either individually or in group, when it if is still trough governmental administration it needs organization feasibility certification to value. The grading is more controlled if it is not on governmental administration, but on accredited professional organization."

"Saat ini, ada dua instrumen untuk menilai dampak lingkungan dan sosial dari proyek pembangkit listrik di Indonesia, yaitu Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan Hidup (Amdal) dan Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan aspek lingkungan dan sosial dari Amdal dan ESIA untuk mengembangkan pedoman dan strategi pengintegrasian dua studi ini. Metode yang digunakan adalah analisis dokumen, wawancara semi terstruktur dan observasi. Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan perbedaan utama ESIA dan Amdal terletak pada fase penapisan, pelingkupan, analisis dampak, dan tindak lanjut. ESIA mencakup aspek fisik-kimia, biologi, (lingkungan) dan sosio-ekonomi (sosial) yang lebih luas dibandingkan Amdal. Mengintegrasikan dua kajian lingkungan ini dapat mengurangi jejak karbon dari studi lingkungan, memperkuat perlindungan lingkungan, efisiensi biaya hingga 12%, meningkatkan kapasitas penyusun dan pelaksana Amdal dan ESIA, peningkatan keberterimaan oleh pengambil keputusan, yaitu pemerintah dan lembaga finansial. 

---

Currently, there are two instruments for assessing the environmental and social impacts of power development projects in Indonesia, which are Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan or Amdal and  Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA). This research aims to compare the environmental and social aspects of Amdal and ESIA to further develop guidance and strategy for the integration of these practices. This research employed document analysis, semi-structured interviews, and field observation. This research found that the main differences between Amdal and ESIA are in the screening, scoping, impact analysis, and follow-up phases. The ESIA covers a wider range of physicochemical, biological, and socio-economic (social) aspects than Amdal does. Integrating the two practices could reduce the carbon footprint, strengthen environmental protection, save costs up to 12%, increase the stakeholder capacity, and improve the acceptance of decision-makers (the government and financial institutions)."