Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"This paper aimed to see the impact of the development of the tourism sector during Indonesia's MidTerm Development Planning Period (RPJMN) 2015-2019. The analysis also aimed to contribute to the Terminal Evaluation of RPJMN 2015-2019. The implementation of this impact evaluation analyzes the achievement of tourism's primary target sector to the national economy and the welfare of individual workers and business units engaged in the field of tourism. The impact on the national economy is evaluated based on relevant secondary data. While the impact analysis on the welfare ofindividual workers and the tourism business unit carried out using primary data obtained through surveys. The field survey was conducted on June-July 2019, covering all provinces, 2.125 individual workers, and 1.082 business units participate as respondents. The proportional sampling method was used to determine the number of respondents in each province. The study found that during 2014- 2019, the competitiveness of the Indonesian tourism sector has increased and has encouraged the increasing number of foreign tourists to visit. The sector has experienced growth and contributes positively to the national economy. At the micro-level, the sector generated a positive impact on thetourism business unit as most of them were claiming to gain profit sustainably during that period. However, the impact was still limited in improving business units' ability to innovate in product development and the ability to generate new employment. There was also a minimal positive impacton the welfare of the sector's workers. In terms of the average earning per month, the welfare of workers in this sector is still relatively low compared to workers in all other sectors."

"This research aims to provide insight on building a holistic approach on the impact of audit work using government oversight parameters sets by The International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI). Quantitave data is collected from surveys of two sample groups to accommodate perspectives from BPK auditors (internal group) and audited governmment organization officials (external group). Semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis are carried out to confirm the quantitative result and deepen the discussion. The results showed that there is small to moderate correlation between INTOSAI dimension of government oversight and audit impact of BPK in which the internal group perceived that the Quality of Audit Work as the key determinant while the external group perceived Executive Responses instead. In addition, evaluation framework is applied to further explain the levels of audit impact. These findings suggest that BPK need to establish its own strategy by formulating suitable measures using evaluation approach to better showcase the impact of their audit work and its contribution to overall improvement in the management of public fund.

---

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan gambaran dalam membangun pendekatan holistik atas dampak audit menggunakan parameter pengawasan pemerintah yang ditetapkan oleh The International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI). Data kuantitatif dikumpulkan dari survei terhadap dua kelompok sampel untuk mengakomodasi perspektif dari auditor BPK (kelompok internal) dan pejabat organisasi pemerintah yang diaudit (kelompok eksternal). Wawancara semi-terstruktur dan analisis tematik dilakukan untuk mengkonfirmasi hasil kuantitatif dan memperdalam diskusi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat korelasi yang kecil sampai sedang antara dimensi INTOSAI pengawasan pemerintah dan dampak audit BPK di mana kelompok internal memandang Kualitas Pekerjaan Audit sebagai penentu utama sedangkan kelompok eksternal memandang Respon Eksekutif sebagai penentu lainnya. Selanjutnya, kerangka kerja dalam teori evaluasi diterapkan untuk menjelaskan tingkat dampak audit. Disamping itu, bahwa BPK sebagai SAI Indonesia menghadapi tantangan kontekstual yang unik baik secara internal maupun eksternal yang belum dapat dijawab atau ditangkap sepenuhnya oleh standar pengawasan pemerintah INTOSAI. Dengan demikian, BPK perlu menetapkan strateginya sendiri dengan merumuskan langkah-langkah yang sesuai dengan menggunakan pendekatan evaluasi untuk menunjukkan dampak pekerjaan audit mereka dan kontribusinya terhadap perbaikan pengelolaan dana publik secara keseluruhan."

"Tren migrasi di Indonesia menunjukkan peningkatan dalam beberapa tahun terakhir sebagai konsekuensi dari perkembangan fasilitas transportasi dan komunikasi, serta jaringan sosial sehingga mempermudah individu dalam melakukan perpindahan antar daerah. Sebagian besar motif migrasi adalah mencari pekerjaan agar mendapatkan penghasilan dan kehidupan yang lebih baik. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis dampak migrasi terhadap peningkatan kesejahteraan para pelakunya. Dengan menggunakan data Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS) tahun 2007 dan 2014 serta metode Propensity Score Matching, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa migrasi memiliki dampak positif terhadap peningkatan kesejahteraan para migran. Peningkatan kesejahteraan akibat migrasi lebih tinggi pada mereka yang berpendapatan tinggi dibandingkan mereka yang berpendapatan rendah.

---

Migration trends in Indonesia have shown an increase in recent years as a consequence of the development of transportation and communication facilities, along with social networks, so that making it easier for individuals to do inter-regional mobility. Most of the motives for migration are looking for a better job to get a better income and life. This study aims to analyze the effect of migration in improving the migrants welfare and analyze the change in poverty status for poor people who migrate. Using the Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS) dataset in 2007 and 2014, as well as the Propensity Score Matching method, this study found that migration has a positive impact on improving the migrants welfare. Improved welfare due to migration is higher in those who were initially more prosperous than those who were low income."

"[Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) adalah program bantuan tunai bersyarat pertama di Indonesia. PKH merupakan cara baru penanggulangan kemiskinan yang sekaligus memutus rantai kemiskinan generasi yang akan datang. Berbagai studi telah dilakukan untuk melihat dampak program ini. Secara umum studi-studi tersebut menunjukkan bahwa PKH mempunyai dampak yang positif. Studi ini bertujuan melihat dampak PKH terhadap kesejahteraan masyarakat di Kabupaten Brebes.Rancangan studi ini menggunakan uji kuantitatif pengeluaran konsumsi berbasis rumah tangga dengan pengukuran sebelum dan sesudah intervensi dan antara rumah tangga penerima program (treatment) dan rumah tangga bukan penerima program (control). Temuan penting studi ini adalah bahwa PKH secara signifikan meningkatkan rata-rata pengeluaran konsumsi rumah tangga peserta program sebesar Rp 60.798 per kapita per bulan atau sekitar 14 persen dibanding sebelum program.

---

Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) is the first conditional cash transfer program in Indonesia. PKH is a new way to reduce poverty and prevent the transmission of poverty to future generation. There have been a number of studies attempting to assess its impact. The overall studies found that PKH had positive impact. This study aims to assess the impact of PKH on welfare of people in Kabupaten Brebes.The methodology used in this study is household based intervention quantitative assessment with measurements before and after and compare different impact between participant household (treatment) and non participant household (control). Main finding of this study is that PKH was significantly improve the welfare of beneficiary households. Their average monthly expenditures increased by Rp 60.798 per person, equal to a 14 percent increase in comparison to pre-program level., Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) is the first conditional cash transferprogram in Indonesia. PKH is a new way to reduce poverty and prevent thetransmission of poverty to future generation. There have been a number ofstudies attempting to assess its impact. The overall studies found that PKHhad positive impact. This study aims to assess the impact of PKH on welfareof people in Kabupaten Brebes. The methodology used in this study ishousehold based intervention quantitative assessment with measurementsbefore and after and compare different impact between participant household(treatment) and non participant household (control). Main finding of thisstudy is that PKH was significantly improve the welfare of beneficiaryhouseholds. Their average monthly expenditures increased by Rp 60.798 perperson, equal to a 14 percent increase in comparison to pre-program level]"

"In 2014 the Indonesian government introduced a national health insurance program and provided insurance premium subsidies for poor people. This study aims to evaluate the health subsidy policy’s impact on the utilization of different kinds of health care facilities. Two waves of Indonesian socio-economic surveys, namely 2013 and 2018, and two analysis methods, namely logistic regression, and difference-in-differences, were applied in this study. The results show that in first-level healthcare facilities, the health subsidy improves the probability of outpatient visits in public health centres and polyclinics but decreases the probability of outpatient visits in medical practices. Then, in secondary-level health care facilities, the health subsidy increased the likelihood of outpatient visits in public hospitals; however, it lowers the probability of outpatient visits in private hospitals.

---

Pada tahun 2014 pemerintah Indonesia menciptakan program Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional dan memberikan subsidi premi asuransi bagi masyarakat miskin. Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi dampak kebijakan subsidi kesehatan terhadap pemanfaatan fasilitas pelayanan kesehatan. Studi ini menggunakan survei sosial ekonomi Indonesia (SUSENAS) tahun 2013 dan 2018, serta menerapkan dua metode analisis, yaitu regresi logistik, dan difference-in-differences. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pada fasilitas kesehatan tingkat pertama, subsidi kesehatan meningkatkan kemungkinan kunjungan rawat jalan di puskesmas dan poliklinik, tetapi menurunkan kemungkinan kunjungan rawat jalan di praktik tenaga medis. Kemudian, pada fasilitas kesehatan tingkat lanjut, subsidi kesehatan dapat meningkatkan kemungkinan kunjungan rawat jalan di rumah sakit umum, namun menurunkan kemungkinan kunjungan rawat jalan di rumah sakit swasta.

"

"Program Corporate Social Responsibility menjadi fokus dalam penelitian ini. Secara khusus penelitian ini meneliti mengenai strategi komunikasi yang dijalankan oleh organisasi dalam upaya pencapaian objektif formal dari program CSR. Teori yang menjadi pedoman dalam penyusunan tesis ini adalah The Management Strategic yang dikemukakan oleh Grunig (1992). Grunig menyatakan bahwa untuk mencapai tujuan dari organisasi maka perlu dilakukan tujuh langkah yang dilakukan secara bertahap yaitu analisis stakeholders, analisis pubik, analisis isu, menyusun objektif formal, perencanaan, implementasi dan evaluasi. Metodologi yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metodologi kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskripsi. Unit observasi dalam penelitian ini adalah CCFI, SBS dan ketiga target sasaran PerpuSeru, yaitu perempuan, pemuda dan pengusaha Usaha Kecil Menengah. Pengamatan yang hanya didasari kedekatan latar belakang budaya tidak cukup untuk memahami karakteristik target sasaran. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa memahami target sasaran menjadi kunci utama keberhasilan sebuah program.

---

The Corporate Social Responsibility program is the focus of this study. Specifically, this study examines the communication strategies undertaken by the organization in achieving the objective of formal CSR programs. Theories that guide in the preparation of this thesis is The Managemen Strategic by Public Realtion proposed by Grunig (1992). Grunig states that to achieve the goals of the organization, it is necessary to seven steps undertaken in stages: analysis of stakeholders, pubic analysis, issue analysis, establish a formal objective, planning strategy and tactics, implementing strategic and tactics and evaluate the impact of the strategy and tactics.

The methodology used in this study is a qualitative methodology to approach the description. The unit of observation in this study is CCFI, SBS and strategic publis of PerpuSeru, namely women, youth and entrepreneurs. Observations were only based on the proximity of cultural background is not enough to understand the characteristics of the target. This study concludes that the target understands the key of the success of a program."

"Makalah ini merupakan studi evaluasi program Kelompok Informasi Masyarakat (KIM), yaitu program yang dibentuk berdasarkan pada Keputusan Menteri Komunikasi dan Informatika RI No. 8 Tahun 2010. Program KIM bertujuan untuk menyediakan media bagi pemerintah untuk melakukan diseminasi informasi dan sebaliknya bagi masyarakat untuk menyuarakanpendapat, aspirasi dan kebutuhannya. Makalah ini merupakan hasil penelitian dengan menggunakan metode survei eksploratori yaitu eksploratori bertahap. Data-data dikumpulkan dari wawancara dengan 15 narasumber dan penyebaran kuesioner terhadap 62 responden. Metode evaluasi yang digunakan adalah desain randomized-post-test-only. Dua wilayah penelitian dalam penelitian ini adalah kelurahan Sukabungah yang merupakan kelompok eksperimen dimana di dalam kelurahan ini terdapat KIM, dan kelurahan Sukagalih yang merupakan kelompok kontrol yang akan digunakan sebagai pembanding analisa. Kerangka evaluasi yang digunakan untuk memahami logika program KIM adalah kerangka evaluasi dampak menurut Dolbeare. Temuan dalam penelitian ini adalah dampak yang terekam tidak sesuai dengan tujuan program KIM. Hal tersebut dibuktikan dengananalisa perbandingan temuan di dua wilayah penelitian. Kedua wilayah tersebut memiliki tingkat akses terhadap informasi yang sama. Namun peningkatan akses terhadap informasi dalam kelompok kontrol merupakan dampak dari program-program lain. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah program KIM tidak efisien mencapai tujuan dan dampaknya sehingga perlu untuk di desain ulang atau justru dihentikan.

---

This paper discusses a program evaluation study on Community Information Group. It is a program that is established by the Ministry of Communication and Information, which is based on the Ministerial Decree No. 8/2010. Through the program, the government is expected to disseminate public information and, simultaneously, the community will be able to voice their concerns and needs. This research used an exploratory survey with a sequential exploratory. In the qualitative analysis, we interviewed 15 key persons to understand the nature of the program and the impact of the access to information. This is enriched with a quantitative analysis. A closed-ended questionnaire was used to survey 62 respondents. The evaluation method was randomized post-test only group design. This research utilized a case study of research design with the Community Information Group of Sukabungah Village - Bandung, because it is regarded as one of the best practices of CommunityInformation Group in Bandung City. Furthermore, Sukagalih Village was used as the control group of the evaluation program study. Dolbeare's model of policy impact was also used in this research. We constructed a causal logic of the program to fully understand the program itself. It is evident from the findings that a set of activities in this program did not meet its expectedimpact. Further, even though the activities are useful for the citizens, the citizens already had access to the same activities provided by other programs. It can be concluded that the establishment of the Community Information Group is inefficient. Hence the Community Information Group program should be re-designed to maximize the impact or otherwise be terminated."

"Dalam upaya memberikan perlindungan sosial terhadap masyarakat miskin dari risiko kesehatan, pemerintah Indonesia mengimplementasikan program jaminan kesehatan sosial bersubsidi bagi masyarakat miskin Askeskin. Program ini kemudian diperluas target dan manfaatnya menjadi Jamkesmas. Penelitian ini meneliti dampak jaminan kesehatan bagi masyarakat miskin terhadap utilisasi layanan kesehatan berupa jumlah kunjungan rawat jalan dan rawat inap, proporsi belanja kesehatan terhadap pengeluaran rumah tangga, serta self-assessed health. Analisis dilakukan pada semua populasi dan subpopulasi termiskin kuintil pertama dalam populasi . Peneliti menggunakan metode propensity score matching dan difference-in-difference untuk analisis data Indonesia Family Life Survey IFLS tahun 2000, 2007 dan 2014. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan program jaminan kesehatan bagi masyarakat miskin memiliki dampak positif signifikan terhadap jumlah kunjungan rawat jalan dan rawat inap; di sisi lain program tidak memiliki dampak signifikan terhadap proporsi belanja kesehatan rumah tangga dan self-assessed health. Program jaminan kesehatan bagi masyarakat miskin secara signifikan telah meningkatkan akses masyarakat miskin terhadap layanan kesehatan, namun tidak signifikan melindungi masyarakat miskin dari risiko belanja kesehatan dan tidak signifikan meningkatkan kualitas kesehatan masyarakat miskin.

---

To improve the poor's access to healthcare services, the Indonesian government introduced Askeskin, a subsidized social health insurance for the poor. Later, Askeskin had policy expansion and became Jamkesmas. We examine the effects of this social health insurance for the poor on health services utilization-outpatient visits, inpatient admissions, household budget share of health spending, and self assessed health. We analyze all samples and the poorest 1st quartile of the sample. Using propensity score matching and difference in difference matching strategies on Indonesia Family Life Survey IFLS datasets 2000, 2007 and 2014, we find the insurance have positive significant impact on outpatient visits and inpatient admissions it does not seem to have significant impact on household budget share of health spending and self assessed health, however. This finding suggests that social health insurance for the poor increases health services utilization outpatient visits and inpatient admissions, on the other hand it does not significantly protect the poor from health spending and not significantly improve health outcome of the poor."