Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Economic growth is the most widely used measure of economic activity. Indonesia as one of G-20 has positive economic growth while global economy downturn. Nevertheless, income inequality rises from 0,363 in 2005 to 0,394 in 2016. High growth GDP does not guarantee that all persons will benefit equally. GDP have limitation in reflection the distribution of income, social and economic progress. Therefore, it takes more than economic growth, namely techniques introduced by United Nation Development Programme (UNDP), Asian Development Bank (ADB), and World Economic Forum (WEF). The result of this study indicate that measurement of inclusive economies in Indonesia generally shows satisfactory results. If different techniques approached is applied, there is a difference in status of inclusiveness in 33 provinces and still inequalities in some variables, mainly occurs in infrastructure, education, and income. Therefore, program priority is needed to deal with that problems."

"This study aims to measure and analyze inclusive growth rate in Indonesia by using per capita expenditure data from Indonesian population. Inclusiveness of growth is obeserved from growth incidence curve and pro poor growth approach using poverty equivalent growth rate (pegr) method. it also sees the effect of growth and income redistribution on poverty change using decomposition of poverty through shapley value. this research is divided into periods, i.e. 2012-2014 and 2014-2016 by grouping the territory of indonesia into three areas, i.e. java and bali, sumatra and kalimantan island, and eastern indonesia. the result shows that in 2012-2014, the income growth in indonesia is inclusive, while in 2014-2016 its growth is not inclusive yet. this is due to the effect of economic growth still hampered by the effect of income inequality over the years 2014 to 2016."

"ABSTRAKPertumbuhan ekonomi di mana seluruh lapisan masyarakat menikmati manfaatnya adalah tujuan pembangunan negara-negara di dunia. Berawal dari krisis Asia tahun 1997-1998 yang meningkatkan kemiskinan dan ketimpangan, semakin penting konsep pertumbuhan inklusif di Indonesia untuk pemerataan manfaat pertumbuhan ekonomi. Salah satu cara meningkatkan pertumbuhan inklusif adalah dengan meningkatkan daya saing setiap daerah di Indonesia. Studi ini mencoba melihat hubungan antara daya saing regional dan pertumbuhan inklusif di Indonesia dalam model ekonometri dengan metode Instrumental Variable 2 SLS. Hasil dari studi ini menunjukkan daya saing regional positif mempengaruhi pertumbuhan inklusif. Kebijakan setiap daerah untuk meningkatkan daya saing regional menjadi penting untuk meningkatkan pertumbuhan inklusif di Indonesia.

---

ABSTRACTInclusive growth has been the main objective of economic development for countries in the world. From Asian crisis in 1998 that Indonesia faced where poverty and inequality rose sharply, the inclusive growth concept gained importance in the country rsquo s development planning. One of the ways to achieve inclusive growth is by encouraging provinces to increase their competitiveness to reduce regional disparity. This study aims to find relationship between regional competitiveness and inclusiveness, using Instrumental Variable 2 SLS method. The result is they both have positive relationship. Policy taken by each local government to increase competitiveness becomes more important as it also increases inclusiveness growth."

"[Selain menghadapi permasalahan kemiskinan, Indonesia juga dihadapkan pada dua tantangan mendasar yang saling terkait yakni bagaimana mempertahankan tingkat pertumbuhan ekonomi dan mengurangi kesenjangan distribusi pendapatan. Dalam menghadapi berbagai hal tersebut, Pemerintah telah mengimplementasikan kebijakan redistribusi melalui strategi pertumbuhan yang inklusif dengan menyalurkan pengeluaran sosial dalam bentuk belanja bantuan sosial dan Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (BOS). Akan tetapi, belum banyak buktiempiris yang dapat menjelaskan dampak pengeluaran sosial terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi. Selain itu, belum dapat dibuktikan apakah pengeluaran sosial yang disalurkan oleh pemerintah Indonesia dapat dikategorikan sebagai strategi pertumbuhan yang pro-poor dan inklusif. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh belanjabantuan sosial dan Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (BOS) terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi di 33 provinsi di Indonesia tahun 2006-2012 menggunakan alat analisis regresi dengan Fixed Effect Model. Setelah mengetahui jenis pengeluaran sosial yang dapat mendorong pertumbuhan ekonomi, selanjutnya penelitian ini akan mengidentifikasi apakah pengeluaran sosial tersebut dapat dikategorikan sebagai instrumen pertumbuhan yang pro-poor dan inklusif dalam kaitannya dengan pengurangan kemiskinan dan pembangunan manusia. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa hanya Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (BOS) yang secara statistik berpengaruh dalam meningkatkan tingkat pertumbuhan ekonomi. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga membuktikan bahwa Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (BOS) dapat dikategorikan sebagai instrumen pertumbuhan yang pro-poor dan inklusif.

---

While battling poverty incidence, Indonesia is also confronted with two interwoven rudimentary challenges, sustained economic growth fueled with prevalent income inequality. Henceforth, the Government had intervened by

executing redistributive policy through the inclusive growth strategy by social expenditures provision in the form of social assistance spending and education support spending (BOS Program). Nonetheless, little has been proven empirically concerning the effect of social expenditures to economic growth and whether such spending can be categorized as pro-poor growth and inclusive growth strategy in the Indonesian context. Against this backdrop, this paper attempts to shed a light in this area by employing regression analysis through the Fixed Effect Model to investigate the effect of social assistance spending and education support spending (BOS Program) to economic growth in 33 Indonesian provinces from 2006-2012. After identifying the type of social spending which is able to stimulate economic growth, this paper then tries to determine whether such social spending can be categorized as pro-poor growth and inclusive growth instrument in the context of its efficacy on poverty alleviation and human development improvement respectively. The result suggests that only education support spending (BOS Program) that statistically significant in uplifting economic growth level. Furthermore, closer investigation indicates that this particular spending can be classified both as pro-poor growth and inclusive growth instrument.;While battling poverty incidence, Indonesia is also confronted with two

interwoven rudimentary challenges, sustained economic growth fueled with

prevalent income inequality. Henceforth, the Government had intervened by

executing redistributive policy through the inclusive growth strategy by social

expenditures provision in the form of social assistance spending and education

support spending (BOS Program). Nonetheless, little has been proven empirically

concerning the effect of social expenditures to economic growth and whether such

spending can be categorized as pro-poor growth and inclusive growth strategy in

the Indonesian context.

Against this backdrop, this paper attempts to shed a light in this area by

employing regression analysis through the Fixed Effect Model to investigate the

effect of social assistance spending and education support spending (BOS

Program) to economic growth in 33 Indonesian provinces from 2006-2012. After

identifying the type of social spending which is able to stimulate economic

growth, this paper then tries to determine whether such social spending can be

categorized as pro-poor growth and inclusive growth instrument in the context of

its efficacy on poverty alleviation and human development improvement

respectively. The result suggests that only education support spending (BOS

Program) that statistically significant in uplifting economic growth level.

Furthermore, closer investigation indicates that this particular spending can be

classified both as pro-poor growth and inclusive growth instrument, While battling poverty incidence, Indonesia is also confronted with two

interwoven rudimentary challenges, sustained economic growth fueled with

prevalent income inequality. Henceforth, the Government had intervened by

executing redistributive policy through the inclusive growth strategy by social

expenditures provision in the form of social assistance spending and education

support spending (BOS Program). Nonetheless, little has been proven empirically

concerning the effect of social expenditures to economic growth and whether such

spending can be categorized as pro-poor growth and inclusive growth strategy in

the Indonesian context.

Against this backdrop, this paper attempts to shed a light in this area by

employing regression analysis through the Fixed Effect Model to investigate the

effect of social assistance spending and education support spending (BOS

Program) to economic growth in 33 Indonesian provinces from 2006-2012. After

identifying the type of social spending which is able to stimulate economic

growth, this paper then tries to determine whether such social spending can be

categorized as pro-poor growth and inclusive growth instrument in the context of

its efficacy on poverty alleviation and human development improvement

respectively. The result suggests that only education support spending (BOS

Program) that statistically significant in uplifting economic growth level.

Furthermore, closer investigation indicates that this particular spending can be

classified both as pro-poor growth and inclusive growth instrument]"