Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKDisertasi ini menguraikan tentang terjadinya perebutan kekuasaan di Kesultanan Palembang. Dalam perebutan kekuasaan tersebut melibatkan dua saudara kandung (Sultan Badaruddin II dan Sultan Najamuddin II), juga melibatkan dua negara asing yaitu Inggris dan Belanda. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan Narativisme untuk menjelaskan terjadinya konflik (internal dan eksternal) di Kesultanan tersebut. Kajian ini menemukan bahwa kehadiran Inggris pada April 1812 di Kesultanan Palembang, memunculkan permusuhan antara dua orang kakak beradik tersebut, sehingga Palembang jatuh ke tangan Inggris. Sejak itu permusuhan dua bersaudara terus berlangsung sampai keduanya wafat. Sesuai isi Traktat London (1814), dinyatakan Inggris harus keluar dari Palembang, sehingga Palembang kembali berada di bawah pengaruh pemerintah kolonial Belanda. Kehadiran Belanda di Kesultanan Palembang, menyebabkan Belanda membagi tiga kekuasaan yairu Belanda, Sultan Badaruddin II, dan adiknya Sultan Najamuddin II. Kembalinya pasukan Inggris dari Bengkulu, menyebabkan konflik di Palembang menjadi semakin rumit. Konflik yang terjadi tidak saja antara dua saudara kandung, tetapi juga antara Sultan Najamuddin II dan Belanda, serta Belanda dan Inggris. Perang, merupakan alternatif penting yang terjadi di Kesultanan Palembang. Dua kali peperangan (1819) dimenangkan oleh Palembang, namun pada peperangan ketiga (1821), Palembang harus mengakui keunggulan kekuatan militer Belanda. Sejak itu Kesultanan Palembang berada di bawah kendali pemerintah kolonial Belanda. Usaha Sultan Najamuddin III untuk melakukan perlawanan mengalami kegagalan, sehingga kesultanan itu dihapuskan (1825).

---

ABSTRACTThis dissertation describes about the occurrence of. The seizure involved two brothers (Sultan Badaruddin II dan Sultan Najamuddin II) and two foreign countries, those are England and Netherland. This research used Narrativism approach in order to explain the occurrence of conflict (external and internal) in that Sultanate. It was found that the attendance of British in April 1812 in Palembang Sultanate led to a hostility between the two brothers (Sultan Badaruddin II dan Sultan Najamuddin II). It made Palembang was under the power of British. The hostility between the two brothers continued until both of them passed away. Based on the London Treaty (1814), it was stated that British had to leave out Palembang so that Palembang was returned back to the power of Dutch colonial. The Dutch then divided Palembang Sultanate into three powers, the Dutch, Sultan Badaruddin II, and his brother Sultan Najamuddin II. However, the return of British from Bengkulu led to a more complicated conflict in Palembang. The conflict was not only between the two brothers, but also between Sultan Najamuddin II and the Dutch and between the Dutch and the British. Finally, the war was the only option for the conflict in Palembang Sultanate. The war happened three times, the first and second war (1819) were won by Palembang, however the Dutch military power conquered the power of Palembang Sultanate in the third war (1821). Since then, the Palembang Sultanate was under the control of the Dutch colonial government. It was Sultan Najamuddin III who continued fighting against the Dutch, however the struggle failed. Finally, Palembang Sultanate was completely removed (1825)."

"ABSTRACTThis dissertation is about nagari reconstruction in a Malalo community seen from contestation and powerrelation perspectives. Specifically, it is about the people of Malalo Singkarak, West Sumatra whoperceive, interpret, and respond to reality in which they live, and their manifestations in the reconstructionuf nr;rgcrri in the momentum of regional autonomy policy. It focuses on the people strategies created anddeveloped inwardly and outwardly their l‘vlalalo’s social organization in forms of accommodation as wellas resistance, and involves various interests of the parts.Back to nagorf means back to their imagined identity, ada! and Islam. The adat and religious leadersconsidered that adat and Islam had been marginalized and ignored during village government era. In theera, they did not have power and authority to run local government and make decision along with thedegradation of their charisma in the community. But, in iragari era they have had golden opportunity toget back their power, influence and authority in making local government policy.This dissertation has gotten significant influences from previous main researches such as Scott (1985),Abu-Lughod (1990), and Tsing (1999). I have been much influenced by Scott’s symbolic obedience andresistance, accommodation and resistance in the same time in temts of various interests. “One is insideand outside the state in the same time", Tsing said. Abu-Lughod has influencd me in her resistance arenaconcept. l applied qualitative approach (Hammersley and Atkinson 1983) in this case study. Datacollecting was conducted through in-depth interviews and participation- observations.This dissertation shows that reconstructing process involves contestation, negotiation, and compromisesindicated through the local leaders’ strategies - accommodating or resisting - in confronting with varioussituations among themselves as well as with State. The local elites are adat leaders, as well as religious orlocal government leaders at the same time. It was sometimes hard to make separate those three one toeach other. The local elites are the linkage between local people and the State. On one hand they havedeveloped political issues through manipulating adat and religious doctrines, but on the other hand theyneed state rhetoric to establish their authorities But, the elites are not solid, homogeneous groups withoutfrictions or conflicts. Accommodation and resistance have occurred at the crossing area of the local elitesthemselves, and between them and the State.In this research nagarf is read as one that contested to, struggled for, debated on, and utilized withpolitical interests. Some of the old features of the adat have been left away but some new things came upthrough negotiation process between the local people and the States interests. lt is therefore nagari is nota static, but dynamic construct in facing with concrete situations of interests. lt is the process ofnegotiation and bargaining, interpretation and re-interpretation, and giving meaning that is calledcontestation in this dissertation. My approach in this dissertation is close to Tsin (1999), Scott (1985), and Abu-Lughod (1990). lt is relevant with Scott’s symbolic obedience and resistance concepts. The different from Scott’s is that the..."