Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Abstrak
This study aims to determine the inter-actor relationships at the Ministry of Marine Affairs of Fisheries (KKP) and outside the KKP in implementing the One Marine and Fishery Data system. The goal, of achieving unified standardized data are unified standardized metadata and a single data portal and the role of the actor in solving data issues that existed in the previous KKP. The approach adopted is to use a networking model to find out more about networking principles such as collective action, degree of sharing and interdependency. The research result states that network relations among the activity factors of the One Marine Fishery Data are driven more by the regulations that applied before. Although this is counterproductive to the spirit of network, interactor network relationships can be realized based on the characteristics of the network. It is also supported by strong leadership at the KKP. There is the need to improve coordination in communication, particularly with parties outside the KKP, strengthen strategies by network managers, and reframe perceptions of actors related to the objectives of the One Marine and Fishery Data so that networking relationships in these activities will grow.

Abstrak :
Data geospasial dibutuhkan untuk mendukung pembangunan nasional berbasis data. Akan tetapi, data geospasial yang tersedia di Indonesia masih belum memadai karena masih adanya tumpang tindih antardata yang diproduksi oleh pemerintah. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan adanya kebijakan penyelenggaraan data geospasial pemerintah, salah satunya adalah Kebijakan Satu Data Indonesia (SDI). Kebijakan SDI mengamanatkan Badan Informasi Geospasial (BIG) sebagai Pembina Data Geospasial Tingkat Pusat dengan memiliki lima tugas utama dalam pembinaan untuk mengimplementasikan SDI khususnya dalam penyelenggaraan data geospasial. Namun dalam mengimplementasikan tugas-tugas pembina tersebut, BIG masih belum mengimplementasikan sepenuhnya seperti belum dilakukannya pemeriksaan ulang data prioritas. BIG masih memiliki permasalahan seperti kurangnya jumlah SDM, anggaran, serta aturan turunan untuk mengimplementasikan kebijakan tersebut. Oleh karena itu, tesis ini bertujuan untuk membahas implementasi dan faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi implementasi kebijakan SDI untuk data geospasial di BIG. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan postpositivism dengan menggunakan konsep implementasi kebijakan dengan teknik pengumpulan data, yaitu wawancara mendalam dan studi pustaka, serta menggunakan teknik analisis ideal type Max Weber. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah belum memadainya implementasi SDI untuk data geospasial di BIG karena masih terdapat banyak kekurangan serta terdapat pula faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi belum memadainya implementasi tersebut. Rekomendasi penelitian berikutnya adalah adanya evaluasi terhadap implementasi SDI secara menyeluruh dari semua stakeholder terkait. ......Geospatial data is needed to support data-based national development. However, the geospatial data which available in Indonesia is still inadequate because there’s overlap between data that produced by government. Therefore, it is necessary to have a government geospatial data management policy, one of which is the Satu Data Indonesia (SDI) policy. The SDI policy mandates the Badan Informasi Geospasial (BIG) as the Central Level Geospatial Data Supervisor has five main tasks in providing guidance in implementing SDI, especially in managing geospatial data. However, in implementing the supervisory duties, BIG still hasn't fully implemented it, as has not done a re-check of priority data. BIG still has problems such as a lack of human resources, budget, and derivative regulations to implement these policies. Therefore, this study aims to discuss the implementation and factors that influence the implementation of SDI policies for geospatial data in BIG. This study uses a postpositivism approach using the concept of policy implementation with data collection techniques, namely in-depth interviews and literature studies, as well as using ideal type Max Weber analysis technique. The results of this study are the inadequate implementation of SDI for geospatial data at BIG because there are still many deficiencies and there are also factors that influence the inadequate implementation. Recommendation for the next study is to evaluate the SDI implementation from all stakeholders.

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Spatial inequality occurs because the rate of availability of geospatial data has not been able to catch up and meet user needs. The root of the problem occurs because the network nodes in the area have not yet been formed or dissolved. The institutional status of network nodes at the provincial level as of October 2018, only 20 out of 34 provinces are operational, with 4 institutional options, namely UPT, Bappeda, Ad Hoc Regional Secretary and Ad Hoc Diskominfotik. This triggered anxiety for 14 regions that had not yet formed network nodes and 3 other UPTDs that were still awaiting evaluation results. To determine the institution of ideal geospatial information, BIG has conducted a study of institutional arrangements to realize effective and efficient regional apparatus organizations according to their duties and functions. The study with qualitative research methods was carried out by analyzing criteria and rating on institutional aspects in order to strengthen IDSN, based on applicable policies and laws as well as the results of the network node operationalization questionnaire in the province. Furthermore, the study was strengthened using quantitative research methods by comparing the costs and benefits of each institutional option (cost and benefit analysis) through the net present value approach. The results of the two methods are 2 alternative institutional geospatial information with the best value, namely Option 1 UPTB Ideal for the long term and Option 3 Ad Hoc in Regional Secretary Quick Win for the medium term.