Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Latar Belakang: Saat ini, material restoratif bioaktif Giomer, komposit resin alkasit, dan semen ionomer kaca modifikasi resin (SIKMR) telah digunakan dalam praktik kedokteran gigi. Dalam rongga mulut, material restoratif bioaktif akan menahan gaya dari pengunyahan dan menghadapi perubahan pH. Oleh karena itu, dilakukan penelitian mengenai pengaruh pH saliva buatan terhadap kuat tekan material restoratif bioaktif. Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan nilai kuat tekan lima material restoratif bioaktif setelah perendaman dalam saliva buatan dengan pH 7 dan 4,5. Metode: Lima kelompok material digunakan dalam penelitian ini: Giomer Beautifil II LS, Zirconomer Improved, Cention N, Activa Bioactive Restorative, dan Fuji II LC Capsule. Dua belas spesimen berbentuk silinder dengan diameter 4 mm dan tinggi 6 mm dari tiap material dibagi menjadi dua kelompok perlakuan, yaitu perendaman dalam saliva buatan pH 7 dan 4,5 selama 7 hari. Spesimen diuji menggunakan Universal Testing Machine (Shimadzu AGS-X 5kN, Japan) dengan crosshead speed 0,5 mm/menit. Hasil: Hasil uji statistik menunjukkan hanya Activa Bioactive Restorative yang memiliki nilai kuat tekan setelah perendaman dalam saliva buatan pH 4,5 lebih rendah secara bermakna dari pH 7. Kesimpulan: Nilai kuat tekan material restoratif bioaktif Giomer, komposit resin alkasit, dan SIKMR secara umum tidak lebih rendah dalam saliva buatan pH 4,5 dibanding dengan pH 7.......Background: Currently, bioactive restorative materials of Giomer, alkasite composite resin, and resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) are being used in dental practice. In the oral cavity, bioactive restorative materials will resist the load from mastication and face changes in pH. Therefore, a study on the effect of pH of artificial saliva on the compressive strength of bioactive restorative materials was conducted. Objective: This study aims to determine the differences in the compressive strength of five bioactive restorative materials after immersion in artificial saliva with a pH of 7 and 4.5. Methods: Five groups of materials were used in this study: Giomer Beautifil II LS, Zirconomer Improved, Cention N, Activa Bioactive Restorative, and Fuji II LC Capsule. Twelve cylindrical specimens with a diameter of 4 mm and a height of 6 mm of each material were divided into two groups, namely immersion in artificial saliva with a pH of 7 and 4.5 for 7 days. The specimens were tested using a Universal Testing Machine (Shimadzu AGS-X 5kN, Japan) with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute. Result:. Statistical tests showed that only Activa Bioactive Restorative had a compressive strength value after immersion in artificial saliva with a pH of 4.5 was significantly lower than pH of 7. Conclusion: The compressive strength values of bioactive restorative materials of Giomer, alkasite composite resin, and RMGIC were generally not lower in artificial saliva with a pH of 4.5 than in pH of 7."

"Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan nilai kekerasan resin komposit microhybrid G-aenial Posterior™ setelah perendaman dalam saliva buatan dengan pH 4,5; 5,5; dan 7 selama 1 hari dan 7 hari.Metode Penelitian: Dalam penelitian ini digunakan 36 spesimen resin komposit microhybrid G-aenial Posterior™ berbentuk silinder dengan ukuran diameter 6 mm dan tebal 2 mm. Selembar mylar strip diletakkan diatas permukaan resin komposit sebelum dilakukan proses curing. Polimerisasi dilakukan menggunakan Light Curing Unit (LED DBA iLed) selama 10 detik dengan irradiansi 1200 mW/cm2. Setelah polimerisasi, spesimen direndam dalam akuades pada suhu 37oC selama 24 jam. Spesimen dibagi menjadi enam kelompok (n = 6) yaitu; perendaman pada saliva buatan pH 4,5 selama 1 hari, saliva buatan pH 5,5 selama 1 hari, saliva buatan pH 7 selama 1 hari, saliva buatan pH 4,5 selama 7 hari, saliva buatan pH 5,5 selama 7 hari, dan saliva buatan pH 7 selama 7 hari. Spesimen diuji menggunakan HMV-G Series Micro Vickers Hardness Tester (Shimadzu, Jepang) dengan beban 50 gram selama 15 detik untuk mendapatkan nilai kekerasan. Data dianalisis dengan uji statistik One-Way ANOVA dan Post-Hoc Bonferroni. Hasil Penelitian: Hasil uji statistik menunjukkan penurunan bermakna nilai kekerasan material G-aenial PosteriorTM setelah dilakukan perendaman selama 1 dan 7 hari dalam saliva buatan dengan pH 4,5; 5,5; dan 7. Nilai kekerasan tertinggi terlihat pada resin komposit microhybrid G-aenial Posterior™ setelah perendaman 1 hari pada pH saliva buatan pH 7 yaitu sebesar 19,14 ± 0,61 VHN. Sedangkan nilai kekerasan terendah terlihat pada resin komposit microhybrid G-aenial Posterior™ setelah perendaman 7 hari pada pH saliva buatan pH 4,5 yaitu sebesar 14,37 ± 0,31 VHN. Kesimpulan: Disimpulkan bahwa dengan pertambahan waktu perendaman, dan penurunan pH saliva buatan didapatkan nilai kekerasan yang menurun pada resin komposit microhybrid G-aenial PosteriorTM.......Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the difference of Microhybrid G-Aenial Posterior™ Composite Resin hardness value after immersion in artificial saliva with pH 4.5; 5.5; and 7 for 1 day and 7 days. Method: 36 specimens of Microhybrid G-Aenial Posterior™ Composite Resin were used in this study. All materials were prepared into disk-shaped specimens of 6 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness. A piece of mylar strip was placed on the top of the specimens just before the polymerization. Polymerization was done using LED curing unit (LED DBA iLed) in 10 seconds with irradiance 1200 mW/cm2. After polymerization, specimens were immersed in 37C aquadest solution for 24 hours. Specimens were divided into six groups (n=6) immersed with artificial saliva pH 4,5 in a day; pH 5,5 in a day; pH 7 in a day; pH 4,5 in 7 days; pH 5,5 in 7 days; and pH 7 in 7 days. Specimens were tested with HMV-G Series Micro Vickers Hardness Tester (Shimadzu, Japan) with 50 gram indentation in 15 seconds. Data were analyzed using One-Way ANOVA and Post-Hoc Bonferroni to assess the significant differences among groups. Result: The result showed hardness significant decreased of G-aenial PosteriorTM after were immersed in 1 and 7 days in 4,5; 5,5; dan 7 pH of artificial saliva. The highest and lowest hardness value seen in microhybrid G-aenial Posterior™ composite resin after were immersed in one day with pH 7 of artificial saliva (19,14 ± 0,61 VHN) and 7 days with pH 4,5 (14,37 ± 0,31 VHN) respectively. Conclusion: It was concluded that the increased immersion time and the decrease in the pH value of the artificial saliva decreased the hardness value of the G-aenial PosteriorTM microhybrid composite resin."